Cargando…

The collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the Campbell Collaboration online library

BACKGROUND: To analyze the collaboration and reporting quality of the systematic reviews of social welfare in the Campbell collaboration online library. METHODS: The Campbell collaboration online library was searched for systematic reviews of social welfare and the basic information extracted in ord...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Li-li, Zhang, Jing, Yang, Ying, Cao, Hao-Yu, Yang, Ke-hu, Si, Li-Juan, Tian, Jin-Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31699088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1241-7
_version_ 1783467345488904192
author Wei, Li-li
Zhang, Jing
Yang, Ying
Cao, Hao-Yu
Yang, Ke-hu
Si, Li-Juan
Tian, Jin-Hui
author_facet Wei, Li-li
Zhang, Jing
Yang, Ying
Cao, Hao-Yu
Yang, Ke-hu
Si, Li-Juan
Tian, Jin-Hui
author_sort Wei, Li-li
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To analyze the collaboration and reporting quality of the systematic reviews of social welfare in the Campbell collaboration online library. METHODS: The Campbell collaboration online library was searched for systematic reviews of social welfare and the basic information extracted in order to assess the reporting quality of systematic reviews using a MOOSE checklist. BICOMS-2 and UCINET software were used to produce the social network, and Comprehensive Meta Analysis (Version 2) and STATA 13.0 were used to analyze the related data. RESULTS: Fifty-seven systematic reviews of social welfare were included. Twenty-eight items of the included social welfare systematic reviews were rated as complete (≥70%). There were significant differences between ≤2013 and ≥ 2014 in five items. These differences were as follows: research published by one organization or more than one organization in one item, more than three authors or less than four authors in two items, and one country or more than one country in six items. It’s completed about researches with more than one organization, three authors or more than one country. Some items were found to have a low reporting rate of studies published before 2014, by one organization, with less than four authors or one country, respectively. The social network of authors and organizations showed good collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: Some items could be further improved with regard to the rate of reporting systematic reviews of social welfare in the Campbell collaboration online library. This could improve the overall quality of social welfare systematic reviews.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6839117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68391172019-11-12 The collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the Campbell Collaboration online library Wei, Li-li Zhang, Jing Yang, Ying Cao, Hao-Yu Yang, Ke-hu Si, Li-Juan Tian, Jin-Hui Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: To analyze the collaboration and reporting quality of the systematic reviews of social welfare in the Campbell collaboration online library. METHODS: The Campbell collaboration online library was searched for systematic reviews of social welfare and the basic information extracted in order to assess the reporting quality of systematic reviews using a MOOSE checklist. BICOMS-2 and UCINET software were used to produce the social network, and Comprehensive Meta Analysis (Version 2) and STATA 13.0 were used to analyze the related data. RESULTS: Fifty-seven systematic reviews of social welfare were included. Twenty-eight items of the included social welfare systematic reviews were rated as complete (≥70%). There were significant differences between ≤2013 and ≥ 2014 in five items. These differences were as follows: research published by one organization or more than one organization in one item, more than three authors or less than four authors in two items, and one country or more than one country in six items. It’s completed about researches with more than one organization, three authors or more than one country. Some items were found to have a low reporting rate of studies published before 2014, by one organization, with less than four authors or one country, respectively. The social network of authors and organizations showed good collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: Some items could be further improved with regard to the rate of reporting systematic reviews of social welfare in the Campbell collaboration online library. This could improve the overall quality of social welfare systematic reviews. BioMed Central 2019-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6839117/ /pubmed/31699088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1241-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Wei, Li-li
Zhang, Jing
Yang, Ying
Cao, Hao-Yu
Yang, Ke-hu
Si, Li-Juan
Tian, Jin-Hui
The collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the Campbell Collaboration online library
title The collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the Campbell Collaboration online library
title_full The collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the Campbell Collaboration online library
title_fullStr The collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the Campbell Collaboration online library
title_full_unstemmed The collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the Campbell Collaboration online library
title_short The collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the Campbell Collaboration online library
title_sort collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the campbell collaboration online library
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31699088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1241-7
work_keys_str_mv AT weilili thecollaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary
AT zhangjing thecollaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary
AT yangying thecollaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary
AT caohaoyu thecollaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary
AT yangkehu thecollaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary
AT silijuan thecollaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary
AT tianjinhui thecollaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary
AT weilili collaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary
AT zhangjing collaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary
AT yangying collaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary
AT caohaoyu collaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary
AT yangkehu collaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary
AT silijuan collaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary
AT tianjinhui collaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary