Cargando…
The collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the Campbell Collaboration online library
BACKGROUND: To analyze the collaboration and reporting quality of the systematic reviews of social welfare in the Campbell collaboration online library. METHODS: The Campbell collaboration online library was searched for systematic reviews of social welfare and the basic information extracted in ord...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31699088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1241-7 |
_version_ | 1783467345488904192 |
---|---|
author | Wei, Li-li Zhang, Jing Yang, Ying Cao, Hao-Yu Yang, Ke-hu Si, Li-Juan Tian, Jin-Hui |
author_facet | Wei, Li-li Zhang, Jing Yang, Ying Cao, Hao-Yu Yang, Ke-hu Si, Li-Juan Tian, Jin-Hui |
author_sort | Wei, Li-li |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To analyze the collaboration and reporting quality of the systematic reviews of social welfare in the Campbell collaboration online library. METHODS: The Campbell collaboration online library was searched for systematic reviews of social welfare and the basic information extracted in order to assess the reporting quality of systematic reviews using a MOOSE checklist. BICOMS-2 and UCINET software were used to produce the social network, and Comprehensive Meta Analysis (Version 2) and STATA 13.0 were used to analyze the related data. RESULTS: Fifty-seven systematic reviews of social welfare were included. Twenty-eight items of the included social welfare systematic reviews were rated as complete (≥70%). There were significant differences between ≤2013 and ≥ 2014 in five items. These differences were as follows: research published by one organization or more than one organization in one item, more than three authors or less than four authors in two items, and one country or more than one country in six items. It’s completed about researches with more than one organization, three authors or more than one country. Some items were found to have a low reporting rate of studies published before 2014, by one organization, with less than four authors or one country, respectively. The social network of authors and organizations showed good collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: Some items could be further improved with regard to the rate of reporting systematic reviews of social welfare in the Campbell collaboration online library. This could improve the overall quality of social welfare systematic reviews. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6839117 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68391172019-11-12 The collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the Campbell Collaboration online library Wei, Li-li Zhang, Jing Yang, Ying Cao, Hao-Yu Yang, Ke-hu Si, Li-Juan Tian, Jin-Hui Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: To analyze the collaboration and reporting quality of the systematic reviews of social welfare in the Campbell collaboration online library. METHODS: The Campbell collaboration online library was searched for systematic reviews of social welfare and the basic information extracted in order to assess the reporting quality of systematic reviews using a MOOSE checklist. BICOMS-2 and UCINET software were used to produce the social network, and Comprehensive Meta Analysis (Version 2) and STATA 13.0 were used to analyze the related data. RESULTS: Fifty-seven systematic reviews of social welfare were included. Twenty-eight items of the included social welfare systematic reviews were rated as complete (≥70%). There were significant differences between ≤2013 and ≥ 2014 in five items. These differences were as follows: research published by one organization or more than one organization in one item, more than three authors or less than four authors in two items, and one country or more than one country in six items. It’s completed about researches with more than one organization, three authors or more than one country. Some items were found to have a low reporting rate of studies published before 2014, by one organization, with less than four authors or one country, respectively. The social network of authors and organizations showed good collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: Some items could be further improved with regard to the rate of reporting systematic reviews of social welfare in the Campbell collaboration online library. This could improve the overall quality of social welfare systematic reviews. BioMed Central 2019-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6839117/ /pubmed/31699088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1241-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Wei, Li-li Zhang, Jing Yang, Ying Cao, Hao-Yu Yang, Ke-hu Si, Li-Juan Tian, Jin-Hui The collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the Campbell Collaboration online library |
title | The collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the Campbell Collaboration online library |
title_full | The collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the Campbell Collaboration online library |
title_fullStr | The collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the Campbell Collaboration online library |
title_full_unstemmed | The collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the Campbell Collaboration online library |
title_short | The collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the Campbell Collaboration online library |
title_sort | collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the campbell collaboration online library |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31699088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1241-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weilili thecollaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary AT zhangjing thecollaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary AT yangying thecollaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary AT caohaoyu thecollaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary AT yangkehu thecollaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary AT silijuan thecollaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary AT tianjinhui thecollaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary AT weilili collaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary AT zhangjing collaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary AT yangying collaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary AT caohaoyu collaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary AT yangkehu collaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary AT silijuan collaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary AT tianjinhui collaborationandreportingqualityofsocialwelfaresystematicreviewsinthecampbellcollaborationonlinelibrary |