Cargando…

Evaluation of tibial tunnel placement in single case posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: reducing the graft peak stress may increase posterior tibial translation

BACKGROUND: The killer turn has been documented as the primary drawback of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. Fanelli advocated placing the tibial tunnel outlet in the inferior lateral part of the PCL fovea to reduce the killer turn. This study aimed to confirm the validity of Fanelli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Zhiqiang, Xiong, Yan, Li, Qi, Chen, Gang, Zhang, Zhong, Tang, Xin, Li, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31699065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2862-z
_version_ 1783467349639168000
author Wang, Zhiqiang
Xiong, Yan
Li, Qi
Chen, Gang
Zhang, Zhong
Tang, Xin
Li, Jian
author_facet Wang, Zhiqiang
Xiong, Yan
Li, Qi
Chen, Gang
Zhang, Zhong
Tang, Xin
Li, Jian
author_sort Wang, Zhiqiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The killer turn has been documented as the primary drawback of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. Fanelli advocated placing the tibial tunnel outlet in the inferior lateral part of the PCL fovea to reduce the killer turn. This study aimed to confirm the validity of Fanelli’s viewpoint regarding PCL reconstruction technique and to assess the specific Fanelli tunnel area on the inferior lateral part of the PCL fovea. METHODS: The geometrical data of the model were obtained by nuclear magnetic resonance (MRI) and computerized tomography (CT), with images taken from a healthy Chinese volunteer. The three-dimensional finite element model of the knee joint was established using Mimics, Geomagic Studio, 3-matic, and Ansys software. The finite analysis was performed after the material behavior, contact and boundary conditions, and loading were defined. The drawer tests were simulated with a posterior tibial load of 134 N at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° knee flexion. The PCL peak stress and tibial translation were recorded and compared among the 30 distinct tibial tunnel loci over a range of angles from 0° to 90°. RESULTS: In the area (Fanelli area, 5–20 mm inferior and 5–10 mm lateral to the PCL anatomical insertion), the lowest PCL peak stress in all sites with different flexion angles was lower than that of the PCL anatomical insertion site. The lowest PCL peak stress with different knee flexion angles was observed in the following location: 10 mm inferior and 5 mm lateral to the PCL anatomical insertion. In the Fanelli area, the tibial translations of three sites were lower and those of other sites were higher than that of the PCL anatomical insertion site. CONCLUSIONS: PCL reconstruction in the Fanelli area, especially 10 mm inferior and 5 mm lateral to the PCL anatomical insertion, could reduce the peak stress of the graft and may reduce the killer turn. However, whether the posterior stability of the knee is affected needs to be further studied.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6839133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68391332019-11-12 Evaluation of tibial tunnel placement in single case posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: reducing the graft peak stress may increase posterior tibial translation Wang, Zhiqiang Xiong, Yan Li, Qi Chen, Gang Zhang, Zhong Tang, Xin Li, Jian BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The killer turn has been documented as the primary drawback of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. Fanelli advocated placing the tibial tunnel outlet in the inferior lateral part of the PCL fovea to reduce the killer turn. This study aimed to confirm the validity of Fanelli’s viewpoint regarding PCL reconstruction technique and to assess the specific Fanelli tunnel area on the inferior lateral part of the PCL fovea. METHODS: The geometrical data of the model were obtained by nuclear magnetic resonance (MRI) and computerized tomography (CT), with images taken from a healthy Chinese volunteer. The three-dimensional finite element model of the knee joint was established using Mimics, Geomagic Studio, 3-matic, and Ansys software. The finite analysis was performed after the material behavior, contact and boundary conditions, and loading were defined. The drawer tests were simulated with a posterior tibial load of 134 N at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° knee flexion. The PCL peak stress and tibial translation were recorded and compared among the 30 distinct tibial tunnel loci over a range of angles from 0° to 90°. RESULTS: In the area (Fanelli area, 5–20 mm inferior and 5–10 mm lateral to the PCL anatomical insertion), the lowest PCL peak stress in all sites with different flexion angles was lower than that of the PCL anatomical insertion site. The lowest PCL peak stress with different knee flexion angles was observed in the following location: 10 mm inferior and 5 mm lateral to the PCL anatomical insertion. In the Fanelli area, the tibial translations of three sites were lower and those of other sites were higher than that of the PCL anatomical insertion site. CONCLUSIONS: PCL reconstruction in the Fanelli area, especially 10 mm inferior and 5 mm lateral to the PCL anatomical insertion, could reduce the peak stress of the graft and may reduce the killer turn. However, whether the posterior stability of the knee is affected needs to be further studied. BioMed Central 2019-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6839133/ /pubmed/31699065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2862-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Zhiqiang
Xiong, Yan
Li, Qi
Chen, Gang
Zhang, Zhong
Tang, Xin
Li, Jian
Evaluation of tibial tunnel placement in single case posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: reducing the graft peak stress may increase posterior tibial translation
title Evaluation of tibial tunnel placement in single case posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: reducing the graft peak stress may increase posterior tibial translation
title_full Evaluation of tibial tunnel placement in single case posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: reducing the graft peak stress may increase posterior tibial translation
title_fullStr Evaluation of tibial tunnel placement in single case posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: reducing the graft peak stress may increase posterior tibial translation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of tibial tunnel placement in single case posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: reducing the graft peak stress may increase posterior tibial translation
title_short Evaluation of tibial tunnel placement in single case posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: reducing the graft peak stress may increase posterior tibial translation
title_sort evaluation of tibial tunnel placement in single case posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: reducing the graft peak stress may increase posterior tibial translation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31699065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2862-z
work_keys_str_mv AT wangzhiqiang evaluationoftibialtunnelplacementinsinglecaseposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionreducingthegraftpeakstressmayincreaseposteriortibialtranslation
AT xiongyan evaluationoftibialtunnelplacementinsinglecaseposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionreducingthegraftpeakstressmayincreaseposteriortibialtranslation
AT liqi evaluationoftibialtunnelplacementinsinglecaseposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionreducingthegraftpeakstressmayincreaseposteriortibialtranslation
AT chengang evaluationoftibialtunnelplacementinsinglecaseposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionreducingthegraftpeakstressmayincreaseposteriortibialtranslation
AT zhangzhong evaluationoftibialtunnelplacementinsinglecaseposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionreducingthegraftpeakstressmayincreaseposteriortibialtranslation
AT tangxin evaluationoftibialtunnelplacementinsinglecaseposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionreducingthegraftpeakstressmayincreaseposteriortibialtranslation
AT lijian evaluationoftibialtunnelplacementinsinglecaseposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionreducingthegraftpeakstressmayincreaseposteriortibialtranslation