Cargando…

Hooked on you: shape of attachment structures in cymothoid isopods reflects parasitic strategy

BACKGROUND: Parasite attachment structures are critical traits that influence effective host exploitation and survival. Morphology of attachment structures can reinforce host specificity and niche specialisation, or even enable host switching. Therefore, it is important to understand the determinant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baillie, Charles, Welicky, Rachel L., Hadfield, Kerry A., Smit, Nico J., Mariani, Stefano, D. Beck, Robin M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31703555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-019-1533-x
_version_ 1783467380314210304
author Baillie, Charles
Welicky, Rachel L.
Hadfield, Kerry A.
Smit, Nico J.
Mariani, Stefano
D. Beck, Robin M.
author_facet Baillie, Charles
Welicky, Rachel L.
Hadfield, Kerry A.
Smit, Nico J.
Mariani, Stefano
D. Beck, Robin M.
author_sort Baillie, Charles
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Parasite attachment structures are critical traits that influence effective host exploitation and survival. Morphology of attachment structures can reinforce host specificity and niche specialisation, or even enable host switching. Therefore, it is important to understand the determinants of variation in attachment structures. Cymothoid isopods are striking ectoparasites of fishes that include the infamous ‘tongue-biters.’ They are known to parasitise hosts in one of four qualitatively distinct anatomical regions. Here, we quantify variation in cymothoid attachment structures — hook-like appendages called dactyli — and test whether differences in dactylus shape are correlated with parasite mode (where they attach), allometry, or both, using multivariate ordinary least squares regression. We also assess the influence of shared ancestry on shape using a molecular phylogeny to weight our models using phylogenetic generalised least squares regression. RESULTS: We find clear differences in shape between externally-attaching and internally-attaching cymothoids but also between anterior and posterior dactyli across various species with the same attachment mode. Allometric effects are significant for anterior but not posterior dactyli. Mouth-attaching species show greater shape variability than gill- and mouth-attaching species. We find no evidence that there are clade-specific patterns of association between parasite mode and dactylus shape. CONCLUSIONS: Parasite mode appears to be the main driver of attachment morphology. This likely reflects several components of parasite ecology including feeding and functional demands of attachment in different microhabitats. Geometric morphometric approaches to the quantification of shape variation of simple structures is an effective tool that provides new insights into the evolvability of parasite attachment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6839256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68392562019-11-14 Hooked on you: shape of attachment structures in cymothoid isopods reflects parasitic strategy Baillie, Charles Welicky, Rachel L. Hadfield, Kerry A. Smit, Nico J. Mariani, Stefano D. Beck, Robin M. BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Parasite attachment structures are critical traits that influence effective host exploitation and survival. Morphology of attachment structures can reinforce host specificity and niche specialisation, or even enable host switching. Therefore, it is important to understand the determinants of variation in attachment structures. Cymothoid isopods are striking ectoparasites of fishes that include the infamous ‘tongue-biters.’ They are known to parasitise hosts in one of four qualitatively distinct anatomical regions. Here, we quantify variation in cymothoid attachment structures — hook-like appendages called dactyli — and test whether differences in dactylus shape are correlated with parasite mode (where they attach), allometry, or both, using multivariate ordinary least squares regression. We also assess the influence of shared ancestry on shape using a molecular phylogeny to weight our models using phylogenetic generalised least squares regression. RESULTS: We find clear differences in shape between externally-attaching and internally-attaching cymothoids but also between anterior and posterior dactyli across various species with the same attachment mode. Allometric effects are significant for anterior but not posterior dactyli. Mouth-attaching species show greater shape variability than gill- and mouth-attaching species. We find no evidence that there are clade-specific patterns of association between parasite mode and dactylus shape. CONCLUSIONS: Parasite mode appears to be the main driver of attachment morphology. This likely reflects several components of parasite ecology including feeding and functional demands of attachment in different microhabitats. Geometric morphometric approaches to the quantification of shape variation of simple structures is an effective tool that provides new insights into the evolvability of parasite attachment. BioMed Central 2019-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6839256/ /pubmed/31703555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-019-1533-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Baillie, Charles
Welicky, Rachel L.
Hadfield, Kerry A.
Smit, Nico J.
Mariani, Stefano
D. Beck, Robin M.
Hooked on you: shape of attachment structures in cymothoid isopods reflects parasitic strategy
title Hooked on you: shape of attachment structures in cymothoid isopods reflects parasitic strategy
title_full Hooked on you: shape of attachment structures in cymothoid isopods reflects parasitic strategy
title_fullStr Hooked on you: shape of attachment structures in cymothoid isopods reflects parasitic strategy
title_full_unstemmed Hooked on you: shape of attachment structures in cymothoid isopods reflects parasitic strategy
title_short Hooked on you: shape of attachment structures in cymothoid isopods reflects parasitic strategy
title_sort hooked on you: shape of attachment structures in cymothoid isopods reflects parasitic strategy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31703555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-019-1533-x
work_keys_str_mv AT bailliecharles hookedonyoushapeofattachmentstructuresincymothoidisopodsreflectsparasiticstrategy
AT welickyrachell hookedonyoushapeofattachmentstructuresincymothoidisopodsreflectsparasiticstrategy
AT hadfieldkerrya hookedonyoushapeofattachmentstructuresincymothoidisopodsreflectsparasiticstrategy
AT smitnicoj hookedonyoushapeofattachmentstructuresincymothoidisopodsreflectsparasiticstrategy
AT marianistefano hookedonyoushapeofattachmentstructuresincymothoidisopodsreflectsparasiticstrategy
AT dbeckrobinm hookedonyoushapeofattachmentstructuresincymothoidisopodsreflectsparasiticstrategy