Cargando…
A new homogeneity index definition for evaluation of radiotherapy plans
PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to define a new homogeneity index (HI) to evaluate dose homogeneity within a target volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The new HI is based on the area under an ideal dose‐volume histogram curve (IA), the area under the achieved dose‐volume histogram curve (AA), and th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31605454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12739 |
_version_ | 1783467406998372352 |
---|---|
author | Yan, Lingling Xu, Yingjie Chen, Xinyuan Xie, Xin Liang, Bin Dai, Jianrong |
author_facet | Yan, Lingling Xu, Yingjie Chen, Xinyuan Xie, Xin Liang, Bin Dai, Jianrong |
author_sort | Yan, Lingling |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to define a new homogeneity index (HI) to evaluate dose homogeneity within a target volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The new HI is based on the area under an ideal dose‐volume histogram curve (IA), the area under the achieved dose‐volume histogram curve (AA), and the overlapping area between the IA and AA (OA). It is defined as the ratio of the square of OA to the product of the IA and AA. To evaluate the performance of the new HI, 88 cases were selected and two plans were designed for each case. The homogeneity of the two plans was first evaluated by three physicists, with their judgments forming the evaluation standard and then evaluated by the new HI and other HIs of D (max)/D(p), D (5)/D (95), (D (2) − D (98))/D(p), (D (2) − D (98))/D (50) and S‐index. An evaluation was determined to be accurate if its result was agreed upon by physicists. The percentage accuracy of evaluation was calculated as the ratio of the number of accurate evaluations to the total number of evaluations. Pearson's chi‐square test was performed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The percentage accuracies of the new HI, D (max)/D (p), D (5)/D (95), (D (2) − D (98))/D(p), (D (2) − D (98))/D (50), and S‐index were 98.51%, 88.80%, 94.78%, 94.78%, 96.27%, and 97.01%, respectively. The newly defined HI had the highest accuracy of all the HIs, with the difference being statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The newly defined HI was shown to be effective in the evaluation of dose homogeneity, and we recommended it for evaluating the homogeneity of radiotherapy plans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6839365 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68393652019-11-14 A new homogeneity index definition for evaluation of radiotherapy plans Yan, Lingling Xu, Yingjie Chen, Xinyuan Xie, Xin Liang, Bin Dai, Jianrong J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to define a new homogeneity index (HI) to evaluate dose homogeneity within a target volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The new HI is based on the area under an ideal dose‐volume histogram curve (IA), the area under the achieved dose‐volume histogram curve (AA), and the overlapping area between the IA and AA (OA). It is defined as the ratio of the square of OA to the product of the IA and AA. To evaluate the performance of the new HI, 88 cases were selected and two plans were designed for each case. The homogeneity of the two plans was first evaluated by three physicists, with their judgments forming the evaluation standard and then evaluated by the new HI and other HIs of D (max)/D(p), D (5)/D (95), (D (2) − D (98))/D(p), (D (2) − D (98))/D (50) and S‐index. An evaluation was determined to be accurate if its result was agreed upon by physicists. The percentage accuracy of evaluation was calculated as the ratio of the number of accurate evaluations to the total number of evaluations. Pearson's chi‐square test was performed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The percentage accuracies of the new HI, D (max)/D (p), D (5)/D (95), (D (2) − D (98))/D(p), (D (2) − D (98))/D (50), and S‐index were 98.51%, 88.80%, 94.78%, 94.78%, 96.27%, and 97.01%, respectively. The newly defined HI had the highest accuracy of all the HIs, with the difference being statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The newly defined HI was shown to be effective in the evaluation of dose homogeneity, and we recommended it for evaluating the homogeneity of radiotherapy plans. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6839365/ /pubmed/31605454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12739 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Yan, Lingling Xu, Yingjie Chen, Xinyuan Xie, Xin Liang, Bin Dai, Jianrong A new homogeneity index definition for evaluation of radiotherapy plans |
title | A new homogeneity index definition for evaluation of radiotherapy plans |
title_full | A new homogeneity index definition for evaluation of radiotherapy plans |
title_fullStr | A new homogeneity index definition for evaluation of radiotherapy plans |
title_full_unstemmed | A new homogeneity index definition for evaluation of radiotherapy plans |
title_short | A new homogeneity index definition for evaluation of radiotherapy plans |
title_sort | new homogeneity index definition for evaluation of radiotherapy plans |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31605454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12739 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanlingling anewhomogeneityindexdefinitionforevaluationofradiotherapyplans AT xuyingjie anewhomogeneityindexdefinitionforevaluationofradiotherapyplans AT chenxinyuan anewhomogeneityindexdefinitionforevaluationofradiotherapyplans AT xiexin anewhomogeneityindexdefinitionforevaluationofradiotherapyplans AT liangbin anewhomogeneityindexdefinitionforevaluationofradiotherapyplans AT daijianrong anewhomogeneityindexdefinitionforevaluationofradiotherapyplans AT yanlingling newhomogeneityindexdefinitionforevaluationofradiotherapyplans AT xuyingjie newhomogeneityindexdefinitionforevaluationofradiotherapyplans AT chenxinyuan newhomogeneityindexdefinitionforevaluationofradiotherapyplans AT xiexin newhomogeneityindexdefinitionforevaluationofradiotherapyplans AT liangbin newhomogeneityindexdefinitionforevaluationofradiotherapyplans AT daijianrong newhomogeneityindexdefinitionforevaluationofradiotherapyplans |