Cargando…

A new homogeneity index definition for evaluation of radiotherapy plans

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to define a new homogeneity index (HI) to evaluate dose homogeneity within a target volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The new HI is based on the area under an ideal dose‐volume histogram curve (IA), the area under the achieved dose‐volume histogram curve (AA), and th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Lingling, Xu, Yingjie, Chen, Xinyuan, Xie, Xin, Liang, Bin, Dai, Jianrong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31605454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12739
_version_ 1783467406998372352
author Yan, Lingling
Xu, Yingjie
Chen, Xinyuan
Xie, Xin
Liang, Bin
Dai, Jianrong
author_facet Yan, Lingling
Xu, Yingjie
Chen, Xinyuan
Xie, Xin
Liang, Bin
Dai, Jianrong
author_sort Yan, Lingling
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to define a new homogeneity index (HI) to evaluate dose homogeneity within a target volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The new HI is based on the area under an ideal dose‐volume histogram curve (IA), the area under the achieved dose‐volume histogram curve (AA), and the overlapping area between the IA and AA (OA). It is defined as the ratio of the square of OA to the product of the IA and AA. To evaluate the performance of the new HI, 88 cases were selected and two plans were designed for each case. The homogeneity of the two plans was first evaluated by three physicists, with their judgments forming the evaluation standard and then evaluated by the new HI and other HIs of D (max)/D(p), D (5)/D (95), (D (2) − D (98))/D(p), (D (2) − D (98))/D (50) and S‐index. An evaluation was determined to be accurate if its result was agreed upon by physicists. The percentage accuracy of evaluation was calculated as the ratio of the number of accurate evaluations to the total number of evaluations. Pearson's chi‐square test was performed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The percentage accuracies of the new HI, D (max)/D (p), D (5)/D (95), (D (2) − D (98))/D(p), (D (2) − D (98))/D (50), and S‐index were 98.51%, 88.80%, 94.78%, 94.78%, 96.27%, and 97.01%, respectively. The newly defined HI had the highest accuracy of all the HIs, with the difference being statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The newly defined HI was shown to be effective in the evaluation of dose homogeneity, and we recommended it for evaluating the homogeneity of radiotherapy plans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6839365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68393652019-11-14 A new homogeneity index definition for evaluation of radiotherapy plans Yan, Lingling Xu, Yingjie Chen, Xinyuan Xie, Xin Liang, Bin Dai, Jianrong J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to define a new homogeneity index (HI) to evaluate dose homogeneity within a target volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The new HI is based on the area under an ideal dose‐volume histogram curve (IA), the area under the achieved dose‐volume histogram curve (AA), and the overlapping area between the IA and AA (OA). It is defined as the ratio of the square of OA to the product of the IA and AA. To evaluate the performance of the new HI, 88 cases were selected and two plans were designed for each case. The homogeneity of the two plans was first evaluated by three physicists, with their judgments forming the evaluation standard and then evaluated by the new HI and other HIs of D (max)/D(p), D (5)/D (95), (D (2) − D (98))/D(p), (D (2) − D (98))/D (50) and S‐index. An evaluation was determined to be accurate if its result was agreed upon by physicists. The percentage accuracy of evaluation was calculated as the ratio of the number of accurate evaluations to the total number of evaluations. Pearson's chi‐square test was performed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The percentage accuracies of the new HI, D (max)/D (p), D (5)/D (95), (D (2) − D (98))/D(p), (D (2) − D (98))/D (50), and S‐index were 98.51%, 88.80%, 94.78%, 94.78%, 96.27%, and 97.01%, respectively. The newly defined HI had the highest accuracy of all the HIs, with the difference being statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The newly defined HI was shown to be effective in the evaluation of dose homogeneity, and we recommended it for evaluating the homogeneity of radiotherapy plans. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6839365/ /pubmed/31605454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12739 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Yan, Lingling
Xu, Yingjie
Chen, Xinyuan
Xie, Xin
Liang, Bin
Dai, Jianrong
A new homogeneity index definition for evaluation of radiotherapy plans
title A new homogeneity index definition for evaluation of radiotherapy plans
title_full A new homogeneity index definition for evaluation of radiotherapy plans
title_fullStr A new homogeneity index definition for evaluation of radiotherapy plans
title_full_unstemmed A new homogeneity index definition for evaluation of radiotherapy plans
title_short A new homogeneity index definition for evaluation of radiotherapy plans
title_sort new homogeneity index definition for evaluation of radiotherapy plans
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31605454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12739
work_keys_str_mv AT yanlingling anewhomogeneityindexdefinitionforevaluationofradiotherapyplans
AT xuyingjie anewhomogeneityindexdefinitionforevaluationofradiotherapyplans
AT chenxinyuan anewhomogeneityindexdefinitionforevaluationofradiotherapyplans
AT xiexin anewhomogeneityindexdefinitionforevaluationofradiotherapyplans
AT liangbin anewhomogeneityindexdefinitionforevaluationofradiotherapyplans
AT daijianrong anewhomogeneityindexdefinitionforevaluationofradiotherapyplans
AT yanlingling newhomogeneityindexdefinitionforevaluationofradiotherapyplans
AT xuyingjie newhomogeneityindexdefinitionforevaluationofradiotherapyplans
AT chenxinyuan newhomogeneityindexdefinitionforevaluationofradiotherapyplans
AT xiexin newhomogeneityindexdefinitionforevaluationofradiotherapyplans
AT liangbin newhomogeneityindexdefinitionforevaluationofradiotherapyplans
AT daijianrong newhomogeneityindexdefinitionforevaluationofradiotherapyplans