Cargando…

Two‐dimensional solid‐state array detectors: A technique for in vivo dose verification in a variable effective area

PURPOSE: We introduce a technique that employs a 2D detector in transmission mode (TM) to verify dose maps at a depth of d(max) in Solid Water. TM measurements, when taken at a different surface‐to‐detector distance (SDD), allow for the area at d(max) (in which the dose map is calculated) to be adju...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Utitsarn, Kananan, Biasi, Giordano, Stansook, Nauljun, Alrowaili, Ziyad A., Petasecca, Marco, Carolan, Martin, Perevertaylo, Vladimir L., Tomé, Wolfgang A., Kron, Tomas, Lerch, Michael L. F., Rosenfeld, Anatoly B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31609090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12744
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: We introduce a technique that employs a 2D detector in transmission mode (TM) to verify dose maps at a depth of d(max) in Solid Water. TM measurements, when taken at a different surface‐to‐detector distance (SDD), allow for the area at d(max) (in which the dose map is calculated) to be adjusted. METHODS: We considered the detector prototype “MP512” (an array of 512 diode‐sensitive volumes, 2 mm spatial resolution). Measurements in transmission mode were taken at SDDs in the range from 0.3 to 24 cm. Dose mode (DM) measurements were made at d(max) in Solid Water. We considered radiation fields in the range from 2 × 2 cm(2) to 10 × 10 cm(2), produced by 6 MV flattened photon beams; we derived a relationship between DM and TM measurements as a function of SDD and field size. The relationship was used to calculate, from TM measurements at 4 and 24 cm SDD, dose maps at d(max) in fields of 1 × 1 cm(2) and 4 × 4 cm(2), and in IMRT fields. Calculations were cross‐checked (gamma analysis) with the treatment planning system and with measurements (MP512, films, ionization chamber). RESULTS: In the square fields, calculations agreed with measurements to within ±2.36%. In the IMRT fields, using acceptance criteria of 3%/3 mm, 2%/2 mm, 1%/1 mm, calculations had respective gamma passing rates greater than 96.89%, 90.50%, 62.20% (for a 4 cm SSD); and greater than 97.22%, 93.80%, 59.00% (for a 24 cm SSD). Lower rates (1%/1 mm criterion) can be explained by submillimeter misalignments, dose averaging in calculations, noise artifacts in film dosimetry. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to perform TM measurements at the SSD which produces the best fit between the area at d(max) in which the dose map is calculated and the size of the monitored target.