Cargando…

Gamma Knife(®) icon CBCT offers improved localization workflow for frame‐based treatment

OBJECT: The purpose of this study was to compare two methods of stereotactic localization in Gamma Knife treatment planning: cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) or fiducial. While the fiducial method is the traditional method of localization, CBCT is now available for use with the Gamma Knife Icon....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duggar, William N., Morris, Bart, Fatemi, Ali, Bonds, Jemeria, He, Rui, Kanakamedala, Madhava, Rey‐Dios, Roberto, Vijayakumar, Srinivasan, Yang, Claus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31587520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12745
_version_ 1783467409915510784
author Duggar, William N.
Morris, Bart
Fatemi, Ali
Bonds, Jemeria
He, Rui
Kanakamedala, Madhava
Rey‐Dios, Roberto
Vijayakumar, Srinivasan
Yang, Claus
author_facet Duggar, William N.
Morris, Bart
Fatemi, Ali
Bonds, Jemeria
He, Rui
Kanakamedala, Madhava
Rey‐Dios, Roberto
Vijayakumar, Srinivasan
Yang, Claus
author_sort Duggar, William N.
collection PubMed
description OBJECT: The purpose of this study was to compare two methods of stereotactic localization in Gamma Knife treatment planning: cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) or fiducial. While the fiducial method is the traditional method of localization, CBCT is now available for use with the Gamma Knife Icon. This study seeks to determine whether a difference exists between the two methods and then whether one is better than the other regarding accuracy and workflow optimization. METHODS: Cone beam computed tomography was used to define stereotactic space around the Elekta Film Pinprick phantom and then treated with film in place. The same phantom was offset known amounts from center and then imaged with CBCT and registered with the reference CBCT image to determine if measured offsets matched those known. Ten frameless and 10 frame‐based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to CBCT patient fusions were retrospectively evaluated using the TG‐132 TRE method. The stereotactic coordinates defined by CBCT and traditional fiducials were compared on the Elekta 8 cm Ball phantom, an anthropomorphic phantom, and actual patient data. Offsets were introduced to the anthropomorphic phantom in the stereotactic frame and CBCT's ability to detect those offsets was determined. RESULTS: Cone beam computed tomography defines stereotactic space well within the established limits of the mechanical alignment system. The CBCT to CBCT registration can detect offsets accurately to within 0.1 mm and 0.5°. In all cases, some disagreement existed between fiducial localization and that of CBCT which in some cases was small, but also was as high as 0.43 mm in the phantom domain and as much as 1.54 mm in actual patients. CONCLUSION: Cone beam computed tomography demonstrates consistent accuracy in defining stereotactic space. Since both localization methods do not agree with each other consistently, the more reliable method must be identified. Cone beam computed tomography can accurately determine offsets occurring within stereotactic space that would be nondiscernible utilizing the fiducial method and seems to be more reliable. Using CBCT localization offers the opportunity to streamline workflow both from a patient and clinic perspective and also shows patient position immediately prior to treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6839378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68393782019-11-14 Gamma Knife(®) icon CBCT offers improved localization workflow for frame‐based treatment Duggar, William N. Morris, Bart Fatemi, Ali Bonds, Jemeria He, Rui Kanakamedala, Madhava Rey‐Dios, Roberto Vijayakumar, Srinivasan Yang, Claus J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics OBJECT: The purpose of this study was to compare two methods of stereotactic localization in Gamma Knife treatment planning: cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) or fiducial. While the fiducial method is the traditional method of localization, CBCT is now available for use with the Gamma Knife Icon. This study seeks to determine whether a difference exists between the two methods and then whether one is better than the other regarding accuracy and workflow optimization. METHODS: Cone beam computed tomography was used to define stereotactic space around the Elekta Film Pinprick phantom and then treated with film in place. The same phantom was offset known amounts from center and then imaged with CBCT and registered with the reference CBCT image to determine if measured offsets matched those known. Ten frameless and 10 frame‐based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to CBCT patient fusions were retrospectively evaluated using the TG‐132 TRE method. The stereotactic coordinates defined by CBCT and traditional fiducials were compared on the Elekta 8 cm Ball phantom, an anthropomorphic phantom, and actual patient data. Offsets were introduced to the anthropomorphic phantom in the stereotactic frame and CBCT's ability to detect those offsets was determined. RESULTS: Cone beam computed tomography defines stereotactic space well within the established limits of the mechanical alignment system. The CBCT to CBCT registration can detect offsets accurately to within 0.1 mm and 0.5°. In all cases, some disagreement existed between fiducial localization and that of CBCT which in some cases was small, but also was as high as 0.43 mm in the phantom domain and as much as 1.54 mm in actual patients. CONCLUSION: Cone beam computed tomography demonstrates consistent accuracy in defining stereotactic space. Since both localization methods do not agree with each other consistently, the more reliable method must be identified. Cone beam computed tomography can accurately determine offsets occurring within stereotactic space that would be nondiscernible utilizing the fiducial method and seems to be more reliable. Using CBCT localization offers the opportunity to streamline workflow both from a patient and clinic perspective and also shows patient position immediately prior to treatment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6839378/ /pubmed/31587520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12745 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Duggar, William N.
Morris, Bart
Fatemi, Ali
Bonds, Jemeria
He, Rui
Kanakamedala, Madhava
Rey‐Dios, Roberto
Vijayakumar, Srinivasan
Yang, Claus
Gamma Knife(®) icon CBCT offers improved localization workflow for frame‐based treatment
title Gamma Knife(®) icon CBCT offers improved localization workflow for frame‐based treatment
title_full Gamma Knife(®) icon CBCT offers improved localization workflow for frame‐based treatment
title_fullStr Gamma Knife(®) icon CBCT offers improved localization workflow for frame‐based treatment
title_full_unstemmed Gamma Knife(®) icon CBCT offers improved localization workflow for frame‐based treatment
title_short Gamma Knife(®) icon CBCT offers improved localization workflow for frame‐based treatment
title_sort gamma knife(®) icon cbct offers improved localization workflow for frame‐based treatment
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31587520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12745
work_keys_str_mv AT duggarwilliamn gammaknifeiconcbctoffersimprovedlocalizationworkflowforframebasedtreatment
AT morrisbart gammaknifeiconcbctoffersimprovedlocalizationworkflowforframebasedtreatment
AT fatemiali gammaknifeiconcbctoffersimprovedlocalizationworkflowforframebasedtreatment
AT bondsjemeria gammaknifeiconcbctoffersimprovedlocalizationworkflowforframebasedtreatment
AT herui gammaknifeiconcbctoffersimprovedlocalizationworkflowforframebasedtreatment
AT kanakamedalamadhava gammaknifeiconcbctoffersimprovedlocalizationworkflowforframebasedtreatment
AT reydiosroberto gammaknifeiconcbctoffersimprovedlocalizationworkflowforframebasedtreatment
AT vijayakumarsrinivasan gammaknifeiconcbctoffersimprovedlocalizationworkflowforframebasedtreatment
AT yangclaus gammaknifeiconcbctoffersimprovedlocalizationworkflowforframebasedtreatment