Cargando…
A Comparison between Ultrasonic Bath and Direct Sonicator on Osteochondral Tissue Decellularization
BACKGROUND: Decellularization techniques have been widely used in tissue engineering recently. However, applying these methods which are based on removing cells and maintaining the extracellular matrix (ECM) encountered some difficulties for dense tissues such as articular cartilage. Together with c...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31737551 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmss.JMSS_64_18 |
_version_ | 1783467422420828160 |
---|---|
author | Forouzesh, Farin Rabbani, Mohsen Bonakdar, Shahin |
author_facet | Forouzesh, Farin Rabbani, Mohsen Bonakdar, Shahin |
author_sort | Forouzesh, Farin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Decellularization techniques have been widely used in tissue engineering recently. However, applying these methods which are based on removing cells and maintaining the extracellular matrix (ECM) encountered some difficulties for dense tissues such as articular cartilage. Together with chemical agents, using physical methods is suggested to help decellularization of tissues. METHODS: In this study, to improve decellularization of articular cartilage, the effects of direct and indirect ultrasonic waves as a physical method in addition to sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) as chemical agents with 0.1% and 1% (w/v) concentrations were examined. Decellularization process was evaluated by nucleus staining with hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) and by staining glycosaminoglycans (GAG) and collagen. RESULTS: The H and E staining indicated that 1% (w/v) SDS in addition to ultrasonic bath for 5 h significantly decreased the cell nucleus residue to lacuna ratio by 66%. Scanning electron microscopy showed that using direct sonication caused formation of micropores on the surface of the sample which results in better penetration of decellularization material and better cell attachment after decellularization. Alcian Blue and Picrosirius Red staining represented GAG and collagen, respectively, which maintained in ECM structure after decellularization by ultrasonic bath and direct sonicator. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonic bath can help better penetration of the decellularization material into the cartilage. This improves the speed of the decellularization process while it has no significant defect on the structure of the tissue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6839442 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68394422019-11-15 A Comparison between Ultrasonic Bath and Direct Sonicator on Osteochondral Tissue Decellularization Forouzesh, Farin Rabbani, Mohsen Bonakdar, Shahin J Med Signals Sens Original Article BACKGROUND: Decellularization techniques have been widely used in tissue engineering recently. However, applying these methods which are based on removing cells and maintaining the extracellular matrix (ECM) encountered some difficulties for dense tissues such as articular cartilage. Together with chemical agents, using physical methods is suggested to help decellularization of tissues. METHODS: In this study, to improve decellularization of articular cartilage, the effects of direct and indirect ultrasonic waves as a physical method in addition to sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) as chemical agents with 0.1% and 1% (w/v) concentrations were examined. Decellularization process was evaluated by nucleus staining with hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) and by staining glycosaminoglycans (GAG) and collagen. RESULTS: The H and E staining indicated that 1% (w/v) SDS in addition to ultrasonic bath for 5 h significantly decreased the cell nucleus residue to lacuna ratio by 66%. Scanning electron microscopy showed that using direct sonication caused formation of micropores on the surface of the sample which results in better penetration of decellularization material and better cell attachment after decellularization. Alcian Blue and Picrosirius Red staining represented GAG and collagen, respectively, which maintained in ECM structure after decellularization by ultrasonic bath and direct sonicator. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonic bath can help better penetration of the decellularization material into the cartilage. This improves the speed of the decellularization process while it has no significant defect on the structure of the tissue. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6839442/ /pubmed/31737551 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmss.JMSS_64_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Forouzesh, Farin Rabbani, Mohsen Bonakdar, Shahin A Comparison between Ultrasonic Bath and Direct Sonicator on Osteochondral Tissue Decellularization |
title | A Comparison between Ultrasonic Bath and Direct Sonicator on Osteochondral Tissue Decellularization |
title_full | A Comparison between Ultrasonic Bath and Direct Sonicator on Osteochondral Tissue Decellularization |
title_fullStr | A Comparison between Ultrasonic Bath and Direct Sonicator on Osteochondral Tissue Decellularization |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison between Ultrasonic Bath and Direct Sonicator on Osteochondral Tissue Decellularization |
title_short | A Comparison between Ultrasonic Bath and Direct Sonicator on Osteochondral Tissue Decellularization |
title_sort | comparison between ultrasonic bath and direct sonicator on osteochondral tissue decellularization |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31737551 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmss.JMSS_64_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT forouzeshfarin acomparisonbetweenultrasonicbathanddirectsonicatoronosteochondraltissuedecellularization AT rabbanimohsen acomparisonbetweenultrasonicbathanddirectsonicatoronosteochondraltissuedecellularization AT bonakdarshahin acomparisonbetweenultrasonicbathanddirectsonicatoronosteochondraltissuedecellularization AT forouzeshfarin comparisonbetweenultrasonicbathanddirectsonicatoronosteochondraltissuedecellularization AT rabbanimohsen comparisonbetweenultrasonicbathanddirectsonicatoronosteochondraltissuedecellularization AT bonakdarshahin comparisonbetweenultrasonicbathanddirectsonicatoronosteochondraltissuedecellularization |