Cargando…

Endless forms of sexual selection

In recent years, the field of sexual selection has exploded, with advances in theoretical and empirical research complementing each other in exciting ways. This perspective piece is the product of a “stock-taking” workshop on sexual selection and sexual conflict. Our aim is to identify and deliberat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindsay, Willow R., Andersson, Staffan, Bererhi, Badreddine, Höglund, Jacob, Johnsen, Arild, Kvarnemo, Charlotta, Leder, Erica H., Lifjeld, Jan T., Ninnes, Calum E., Olsson, Mats, Parker, Geoff A., Pizzari, Tommaso, Qvarnström, Anna, Safran, Rebecca J., Svensson, Ola, Edwards, Scott V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31720113
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7988
_version_ 1783467439252570112
author Lindsay, Willow R.
Andersson, Staffan
Bererhi, Badreddine
Höglund, Jacob
Johnsen, Arild
Kvarnemo, Charlotta
Leder, Erica H.
Lifjeld, Jan T.
Ninnes, Calum E.
Olsson, Mats
Parker, Geoff A.
Pizzari, Tommaso
Qvarnström, Anna
Safran, Rebecca J.
Svensson, Ola
Edwards, Scott V.
author_facet Lindsay, Willow R.
Andersson, Staffan
Bererhi, Badreddine
Höglund, Jacob
Johnsen, Arild
Kvarnemo, Charlotta
Leder, Erica H.
Lifjeld, Jan T.
Ninnes, Calum E.
Olsson, Mats
Parker, Geoff A.
Pizzari, Tommaso
Qvarnström, Anna
Safran, Rebecca J.
Svensson, Ola
Edwards, Scott V.
author_sort Lindsay, Willow R.
collection PubMed
description In recent years, the field of sexual selection has exploded, with advances in theoretical and empirical research complementing each other in exciting ways. This perspective piece is the product of a “stock-taking” workshop on sexual selection and sexual conflict. Our aim is to identify and deliberate on outstanding questions and to stimulate discussion rather than provide a comprehensive overview of the entire field. These questions are organized into four thematic sections we deem essential to the field. First we focus on the evolution of mate choice and mating systems. Variation in mate quality can generate both competition and choice in the opposite sex, with implications for the evolution of mating systems. Limitations on mate choice may dictate the importance of direct vs. indirect benefits in mating decisions and consequently, mating systems, especially with regard to polyandry. Second, we focus on how sender and receiver mechanisms shape signal design. Mediation of honest signal content likely depends on integration of temporally variable social and physiological costs that are challenging to measure. We view the neuroethology of sensory and cognitive receiver biases as the main key to signal form and the ‘aesthetic sense’ proposed by Darwin. Since a receiver bias is sufficient to both initiate and drive ornament or armament exaggeration, without a genetically correlated or even coevolving receiver, this may be the appropriate ‘null model’ of sexual selection. Thirdly, we focus on the genetic architecture of sexually selected traits. Despite advances in modern molecular techniques, the number and identity of genes underlying performance, display and secondary sexual traits remains largely unknown. In-depth investigations into the genetic basis of sexual dimorphism in the context of long-term field studies will reveal constraints and trajectories of sexually selected trait evolution. Finally, we focus on sexual selection and conflict as drivers of speciation. Population divergence and speciation are often influenced by an interplay between sexual and natural selection. The extent to which sexual selection promotes or counteracts population divergence may vary depending on the genetic architecture of traits as well as the covariance between mating competition and local adaptation. Additionally, post-copulatory processes, such as selection against heterospecific sperm, may influence the importance of sexual selection in speciation. We propose that efforts to resolve these four themes can catalyze conceptual progress in the field of sexual selection, and we offer potential avenues of research to advance this progress.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6839514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68395142019-11-12 Endless forms of sexual selection Lindsay, Willow R. Andersson, Staffan Bererhi, Badreddine Höglund, Jacob Johnsen, Arild Kvarnemo, Charlotta Leder, Erica H. Lifjeld, Jan T. Ninnes, Calum E. Olsson, Mats Parker, Geoff A. Pizzari, Tommaso Qvarnström, Anna Safran, Rebecca J. Svensson, Ola Edwards, Scott V. PeerJ Animal Behavior In recent years, the field of sexual selection has exploded, with advances in theoretical and empirical research complementing each other in exciting ways. This perspective piece is the product of a “stock-taking” workshop on sexual selection and sexual conflict. Our aim is to identify and deliberate on outstanding questions and to stimulate discussion rather than provide a comprehensive overview of the entire field. These questions are organized into four thematic sections we deem essential to the field. First we focus on the evolution of mate choice and mating systems. Variation in mate quality can generate both competition and choice in the opposite sex, with implications for the evolution of mating systems. Limitations on mate choice may dictate the importance of direct vs. indirect benefits in mating decisions and consequently, mating systems, especially with regard to polyandry. Second, we focus on how sender and receiver mechanisms shape signal design. Mediation of honest signal content likely depends on integration of temporally variable social and physiological costs that are challenging to measure. We view the neuroethology of sensory and cognitive receiver biases as the main key to signal form and the ‘aesthetic sense’ proposed by Darwin. Since a receiver bias is sufficient to both initiate and drive ornament or armament exaggeration, without a genetically correlated or even coevolving receiver, this may be the appropriate ‘null model’ of sexual selection. Thirdly, we focus on the genetic architecture of sexually selected traits. Despite advances in modern molecular techniques, the number and identity of genes underlying performance, display and secondary sexual traits remains largely unknown. In-depth investigations into the genetic basis of sexual dimorphism in the context of long-term field studies will reveal constraints and trajectories of sexually selected trait evolution. Finally, we focus on sexual selection and conflict as drivers of speciation. Population divergence and speciation are often influenced by an interplay between sexual and natural selection. The extent to which sexual selection promotes or counteracts population divergence may vary depending on the genetic architecture of traits as well as the covariance between mating competition and local adaptation. Additionally, post-copulatory processes, such as selection against heterospecific sperm, may influence the importance of sexual selection in speciation. We propose that efforts to resolve these four themes can catalyze conceptual progress in the field of sexual selection, and we offer potential avenues of research to advance this progress. PeerJ Inc. 2019-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6839514/ /pubmed/31720113 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7988 Text en ©2019 Lindsay et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Animal Behavior
Lindsay, Willow R.
Andersson, Staffan
Bererhi, Badreddine
Höglund, Jacob
Johnsen, Arild
Kvarnemo, Charlotta
Leder, Erica H.
Lifjeld, Jan T.
Ninnes, Calum E.
Olsson, Mats
Parker, Geoff A.
Pizzari, Tommaso
Qvarnström, Anna
Safran, Rebecca J.
Svensson, Ola
Edwards, Scott V.
Endless forms of sexual selection
title Endless forms of sexual selection
title_full Endless forms of sexual selection
title_fullStr Endless forms of sexual selection
title_full_unstemmed Endless forms of sexual selection
title_short Endless forms of sexual selection
title_sort endless forms of sexual selection
topic Animal Behavior
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31720113
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7988
work_keys_str_mv AT lindsaywillowr endlessformsofsexualselection
AT anderssonstaffan endlessformsofsexualselection
AT bererhibadreddine endlessformsofsexualselection
AT hoglundjacob endlessformsofsexualselection
AT johnsenarild endlessformsofsexualselection
AT kvarnemocharlotta endlessformsofsexualselection
AT lederericah endlessformsofsexualselection
AT lifjeldjant endlessformsofsexualselection
AT ninnescalume endlessformsofsexualselection
AT olssonmats endlessformsofsexualselection
AT parkergeoffa endlessformsofsexualselection
AT pizzaritommaso endlessformsofsexualselection
AT qvarnstromanna endlessformsofsexualselection
AT safranrebeccaj endlessformsofsexualselection
AT svenssonola endlessformsofsexualselection
AT edwardsscottv endlessformsofsexualselection