Cargando…

Pig farmers’ willingness to pay for management strategies to reduce aggression between pigs

When deciding whether to invest in an improvement to animal welfare, farmers must trade-off the relative costs and benefits. Despite the existence of effective solutions to many animal welfare issues, farmers’ willingness to pay for them is largely unknown. This study modelled pig farmers’ decisions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peden, Rachel S. E., Akaichi, Faical, Camerlink, Irene, Boyle, Laura A., Turner, Simon P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31703105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224924
_version_ 1783467506485166080
author Peden, Rachel S. E.
Akaichi, Faical
Camerlink, Irene
Boyle, Laura A.
Turner, Simon P.
author_facet Peden, Rachel S. E.
Akaichi, Faical
Camerlink, Irene
Boyle, Laura A.
Turner, Simon P.
author_sort Peden, Rachel S. E.
collection PubMed
description When deciding whether to invest in an improvement to animal welfare, farmers must trade-off the relative costs and benefits. Despite the existence of effective solutions to many animal welfare issues, farmers’ willingness to pay for them is largely unknown. This study modelled pig farmers’ decisions to improve animal welfare using a discrete choice experiment focused on alleviating aggression between growing/finishing pigs at regrouping. Eighty-two UK and Irish pig farm owners and managers were asked to choose between hypothetical aggression control strategies described in terms of four attributes; installation cost, on-going cost, impact on skin lesions from aggression and impact on growth rate. If they did not like any of the strategies they could opt to keep their current farm practice. Systematic variations in product attributes allowed farmers’ preferences and willingness to pay to be estimated and latent class modelling accounted for heterogeneity in responses. The overall willingness to pay to reduce lesions was low at £0.06 per pig place (installation cost) and £0.01 per pig produced (running cost) for each 1% reduction in lesions. Results revealed three independent classes of farmers. Farmers in Class 1 were unlikely to regroup unfamiliar growing/finishing pigs, and thus were unwilling to adopt measures to reduce aggression at regrouping. Farmers in Classes 2 and 3 were willing to adopt measures providing certain pre-conditions were met. Farmers in Class 2 were motivated mainly by business goals, whilst farmers in Class 3 were motivated by both business and animal welfare goals, and were willing to pay the most to reduce aggression; £0.11 per pig place and £0.03 per pig produced for each 1% reduction in lesions. Farmers should not be considered a homogeneous group regarding the adoption of animal welfare innovations. Instead, campaigns should be targeted at subgroups according to their independent preferences and willingness to pay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6839880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68398802019-11-15 Pig farmers’ willingness to pay for management strategies to reduce aggression between pigs Peden, Rachel S. E. Akaichi, Faical Camerlink, Irene Boyle, Laura A. Turner, Simon P. PLoS One Research Article When deciding whether to invest in an improvement to animal welfare, farmers must trade-off the relative costs and benefits. Despite the existence of effective solutions to many animal welfare issues, farmers’ willingness to pay for them is largely unknown. This study modelled pig farmers’ decisions to improve animal welfare using a discrete choice experiment focused on alleviating aggression between growing/finishing pigs at regrouping. Eighty-two UK and Irish pig farm owners and managers were asked to choose between hypothetical aggression control strategies described in terms of four attributes; installation cost, on-going cost, impact on skin lesions from aggression and impact on growth rate. If they did not like any of the strategies they could opt to keep their current farm practice. Systematic variations in product attributes allowed farmers’ preferences and willingness to pay to be estimated and latent class modelling accounted for heterogeneity in responses. The overall willingness to pay to reduce lesions was low at £0.06 per pig place (installation cost) and £0.01 per pig produced (running cost) for each 1% reduction in lesions. Results revealed three independent classes of farmers. Farmers in Class 1 were unlikely to regroup unfamiliar growing/finishing pigs, and thus were unwilling to adopt measures to reduce aggression at regrouping. Farmers in Classes 2 and 3 were willing to adopt measures providing certain pre-conditions were met. Farmers in Class 2 were motivated mainly by business goals, whilst farmers in Class 3 were motivated by both business and animal welfare goals, and were willing to pay the most to reduce aggression; £0.11 per pig place and £0.03 per pig produced for each 1% reduction in lesions. Farmers should not be considered a homogeneous group regarding the adoption of animal welfare innovations. Instead, campaigns should be targeted at subgroups according to their independent preferences and willingness to pay. Public Library of Science 2019-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6839880/ /pubmed/31703105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224924 Text en © 2019 Peden et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Peden, Rachel S. E.
Akaichi, Faical
Camerlink, Irene
Boyle, Laura A.
Turner, Simon P.
Pig farmers’ willingness to pay for management strategies to reduce aggression between pigs
title Pig farmers’ willingness to pay for management strategies to reduce aggression between pigs
title_full Pig farmers’ willingness to pay for management strategies to reduce aggression between pigs
title_fullStr Pig farmers’ willingness to pay for management strategies to reduce aggression between pigs
title_full_unstemmed Pig farmers’ willingness to pay for management strategies to reduce aggression between pigs
title_short Pig farmers’ willingness to pay for management strategies to reduce aggression between pigs
title_sort pig farmers’ willingness to pay for management strategies to reduce aggression between pigs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31703105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224924
work_keys_str_mv AT pedenrachelse pigfarmerswillingnesstopayformanagementstrategiestoreduceaggressionbetweenpigs
AT akaichifaical pigfarmerswillingnesstopayformanagementstrategiestoreduceaggressionbetweenpigs
AT camerlinkirene pigfarmerswillingnesstopayformanagementstrategiestoreduceaggressionbetweenpigs
AT boylelauraa pigfarmerswillingnesstopayformanagementstrategiestoreduceaggressionbetweenpigs
AT turnersimonp pigfarmerswillingnesstopayformanagementstrategiestoreduceaggressionbetweenpigs