Cargando…

ELDER SELF-NEGLECT: REPORTING AND RESPONSE WITHOUT APS OVERSIGHT

Self-neglect is generally considered a geriatric phenomenon and subsumed within the category of elder abuse and neglect. In the U.S., self-neglect is the most commonly reported form of elder abuse and neglect and has been linked to decreased physical and psychological well-being, higher mortality ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Melekis, Kelly A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6840375/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.1687
_version_ 1783467612154363904
author Melekis, Kelly A
author_facet Melekis, Kelly A
author_sort Melekis, Kelly A
collection PubMed
description Self-neglect is generally considered a geriatric phenomenon and subsumed within the category of elder abuse and neglect. In the U.S., self-neglect is the most commonly reported form of elder abuse and neglect and has been linked to decreased physical and psychological well-being, higher mortality rate, and increase health care services utilization. While self-neglect typically falls under the purview of a state’s adult protective service (APS) system, there are several states where this is not codified and/or practiced. This study examined the state of existing laws, policies and programs that address elder self-neglect in the U.S. in an effort to better understand how self-neglect reporting and response is handled, particularly in states where APS does not have oversight. A 50-state review of existing policies and laws addressing elder self-neglect was followed by key stakeholder interviews with those who oversee self-neglect reporting and response in states where APS does not have oversight. Findings indicate that a range of rationales explain variation in responsibility for self-neglect cases, including a lack of specificity in statutes, concerns that self-neglect does not fit into legal/criminal models due to the lack of perpetrator/victim relationship, and strong sentiments that those engaging in self-neglect need human services and support rather than investigatory or legal approaches. While the inclusion of self-neglect into the broad category of elder abuse and neglect is often perceived as vital for the provision of services, findings indicate it may exacerbate the complex challenges inherent in defining and conceptualizing both the term and its response.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6840375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68403752019-11-14 ELDER SELF-NEGLECT: REPORTING AND RESPONSE WITHOUT APS OVERSIGHT Melekis, Kelly A Innov Aging Session 2320 (Poster) Self-neglect is generally considered a geriatric phenomenon and subsumed within the category of elder abuse and neglect. In the U.S., self-neglect is the most commonly reported form of elder abuse and neglect and has been linked to decreased physical and psychological well-being, higher mortality rate, and increase health care services utilization. While self-neglect typically falls under the purview of a state’s adult protective service (APS) system, there are several states where this is not codified and/or practiced. This study examined the state of existing laws, policies and programs that address elder self-neglect in the U.S. in an effort to better understand how self-neglect reporting and response is handled, particularly in states where APS does not have oversight. A 50-state review of existing policies and laws addressing elder self-neglect was followed by key stakeholder interviews with those who oversee self-neglect reporting and response in states where APS does not have oversight. Findings indicate that a range of rationales explain variation in responsibility for self-neglect cases, including a lack of specificity in statutes, concerns that self-neglect does not fit into legal/criminal models due to the lack of perpetrator/victim relationship, and strong sentiments that those engaging in self-neglect need human services and support rather than investigatory or legal approaches. While the inclusion of self-neglect into the broad category of elder abuse and neglect is often perceived as vital for the provision of services, findings indicate it may exacerbate the complex challenges inherent in defining and conceptualizing both the term and its response. Oxford University Press 2019-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6840375/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.1687 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Session 2320 (Poster)
Melekis, Kelly A
ELDER SELF-NEGLECT: REPORTING AND RESPONSE WITHOUT APS OVERSIGHT
title ELDER SELF-NEGLECT: REPORTING AND RESPONSE WITHOUT APS OVERSIGHT
title_full ELDER SELF-NEGLECT: REPORTING AND RESPONSE WITHOUT APS OVERSIGHT
title_fullStr ELDER SELF-NEGLECT: REPORTING AND RESPONSE WITHOUT APS OVERSIGHT
title_full_unstemmed ELDER SELF-NEGLECT: REPORTING AND RESPONSE WITHOUT APS OVERSIGHT
title_short ELDER SELF-NEGLECT: REPORTING AND RESPONSE WITHOUT APS OVERSIGHT
title_sort elder self-neglect: reporting and response without aps oversight
topic Session 2320 (Poster)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6840375/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.1687
work_keys_str_mv AT melekiskellya elderselfneglectreportingandresponsewithoutapsoversight