Cargando…
RACIAL-ETHNIC DISPARITIES IN ATTITUDES TOWARD PASSIVE AND ACTIVE EUTHANASIA
This paper examined racial/ethnic differences in opinions about passive euthanasia (withdrawing or withholding treatment), suicide, and physician-assisted suicide. Data came from 1,832 participants in the 2013 Pew Religion and Public Life Project. Respondents from all racial/ethnic backgrounds were...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6840890/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.1590 |
Sumario: | This paper examined racial/ethnic differences in opinions about passive euthanasia (withdrawing or withholding treatment), suicide, and physician-assisted suicide. Data came from 1,832 participants in the 2013 Pew Religion and Public Life Project. Respondents from all racial/ethnic backgrounds were most likely to favor multiple forms of euthanasia. However, persons of color had a wider variety of opinions about euthanasia than did non-Hispanic whites. In multivariate multinomial logistic regressions, non-Hispanic whites had a 63% chance of approving broadly of euthanasia, while non-Hispanic blacks had a 40% chance, and Hispanics, a 49% chance. Opposition to euthanasia was most common among people with multiple disadvantages (e.g., educational attainment, immigrant status). Neither trust in health care providers nor recent experience with the death of a loved one explained these group differences. Results highlight large differences of opinion between the people who set policy and practice guidelines and those who lack this power and access. |
---|