Cargando…

Dental implants in patients with epidermolysis bullosa: a systematic review

PURPOSE: To integrate the available data published on patients with epidermolysis bullosa (EB) rehabilitated with dental implants, as well as to review the recommendations for EB patients receiving implants. METHODS: An electronic search was undertaken in February 2019 in five databases. RESULTS: Si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos, Gomez, Ricardo Santiago
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6841645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31659571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-019-00802-0
_version_ 1783467933745283072
author Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos
Gomez, Ricardo Santiago
author_facet Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos
Gomez, Ricardo Santiago
author_sort Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To integrate the available data published on patients with epidermolysis bullosa (EB) rehabilitated with dental implants, as well as to review the recommendations for EB patients receiving implants. METHODS: An electronic search was undertaken in February 2019 in five databases. RESULTS: Sixteen publications were included, reporting 28 patients with EB, rehabilitated with 161 dental implants. The mean ± SD patients’ age at implant surgery was 34.7 ± 12.1 years (range, 13–56). Only one implant was placed in the molar region, all other implants were placed in the incisor, canine, and premolar regions. Patients received a mean ± SD of 5.8 ± 2.8 implants (range, 2–11). Most of the patients received implant-supported fixed prostheses (fixed partial 14.3%, fixed full-arch 60.7%, overdenture 25%). Implant and prosthesis failure rates were 1.3% and 0%, respectively. The two implant failures were detected before or at the abutment connection. The mean ± SD follow-up time was of 39.2 ± 24.5 months (range, 6–111). The EB patient quality-of-life improved considerably as a result of treatment with dental implants. There is a series of dental care considerations that should be followed to smooth the implant treatment in EB patients. CONCLUSIONS: The dental implant failure rate in EB patients seems to be very low, although the few cases reported in the literature were followed up for a short mean period, i.e., just a little bit longer than 3 years. More cases followed up for a long period are needed in order to be able to make a more reliable prognosis for the long-term oral rehabilitation of EB patients with dental implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6841645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68416452019-11-20 Dental implants in patients with epidermolysis bullosa: a systematic review Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos Gomez, Ricardo Santiago Oral Maxillofac Surg Review Article PURPOSE: To integrate the available data published on patients with epidermolysis bullosa (EB) rehabilitated with dental implants, as well as to review the recommendations for EB patients receiving implants. METHODS: An electronic search was undertaken in February 2019 in five databases. RESULTS: Sixteen publications were included, reporting 28 patients with EB, rehabilitated with 161 dental implants. The mean ± SD patients’ age at implant surgery was 34.7 ± 12.1 years (range, 13–56). Only one implant was placed in the molar region, all other implants were placed in the incisor, canine, and premolar regions. Patients received a mean ± SD of 5.8 ± 2.8 implants (range, 2–11). Most of the patients received implant-supported fixed prostheses (fixed partial 14.3%, fixed full-arch 60.7%, overdenture 25%). Implant and prosthesis failure rates were 1.3% and 0%, respectively. The two implant failures were detected before or at the abutment connection. The mean ± SD follow-up time was of 39.2 ± 24.5 months (range, 6–111). The EB patient quality-of-life improved considerably as a result of treatment with dental implants. There is a series of dental care considerations that should be followed to smooth the implant treatment in EB patients. CONCLUSIONS: The dental implant failure rate in EB patients seems to be very low, although the few cases reported in the literature were followed up for a short mean period, i.e., just a little bit longer than 3 years. More cases followed up for a long period are needed in order to be able to make a more reliable prognosis for the long-term oral rehabilitation of EB patients with dental implants. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-10-28 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6841645/ /pubmed/31659571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-019-00802-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Article
Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos
Gomez, Ricardo Santiago
Dental implants in patients with epidermolysis bullosa: a systematic review
title Dental implants in patients with epidermolysis bullosa: a systematic review
title_full Dental implants in patients with epidermolysis bullosa: a systematic review
title_fullStr Dental implants in patients with epidermolysis bullosa: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Dental implants in patients with epidermolysis bullosa: a systematic review
title_short Dental implants in patients with epidermolysis bullosa: a systematic review
title_sort dental implants in patients with epidermolysis bullosa: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6841645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31659571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-019-00802-0
work_keys_str_mv AT chrcanovicbrunoramos dentalimplantsinpatientswithepidermolysisbullosaasystematicreview
AT gomezricardosantiago dentalimplantsinpatientswithepidermolysisbullosaasystematicreview