Cargando…

Assessment of long-term sickness absence: content and face validity of a new questionnaire based on qualitative data from nominal groups

BACKGROUND: Increasing rates of long-term sickness absence are a worldwide problem. Belgium is the first country in Europe that aims to screen its entire population of sick leavers (sick leave > 6 weeks) for the risk of long-term sickness absence in order to focus resources on the high-risk group...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goorts, Kaat, Vanovenberghe, Charlotte, Lambreghts, Charlotte, Bruneel, Eline, Rusu, Dorina, Vandenbroeck, Sofie, Godderis, Lode
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6842172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31703629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0852-3
_version_ 1783467996011823104
author Goorts, Kaat
Vanovenberghe, Charlotte
Lambreghts, Charlotte
Bruneel, Eline
Rusu, Dorina
Vandenbroeck, Sofie
Godderis, Lode
author_facet Goorts, Kaat
Vanovenberghe, Charlotte
Lambreghts, Charlotte
Bruneel, Eline
Rusu, Dorina
Vandenbroeck, Sofie
Godderis, Lode
author_sort Goorts, Kaat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increasing rates of long-term sickness absence are a worldwide problem. Belgium is the first country in Europe that aims to screen its entire population of sick leavers (sick leave > 6 weeks) for the risk of long-term sickness absence in order to focus resources on the high-risk group and to provide adequate return-to-work support. Our aim was to investigate content and face validity of a newly designed questionnaire (Quickscan) using item prioritization of patients and professionals in the field of long-term sickness absence. This questionnaire was developed based on a review of the literature and existing instruments (Goorts et al, J Public Health Res 7:1419, 2018). METHODS: Qualitative data were collected using the nominal group technique. The data were gathered exploring factors that influence return-to work restrictions or opportunities. RESULTS: Participants indicated 20 out of 21 of the questionnaire factors as important reasons that might influence the return-to-work process. Additionally, 16 factors were discussed that were not yet included in the Quickscan but that might provide useful information on return-to-work issues, according to the participants. In the prioritization of items, we found considerable diversity among participants. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate the validity of the Quickscan items to ask patients about important return-to-work barriers or opportunities. However, additional factors were identified that may improve the assessment of risk for long-term sickness absence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6842172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68421722019-11-14 Assessment of long-term sickness absence: content and face validity of a new questionnaire based on qualitative data from nominal groups Goorts, Kaat Vanovenberghe, Charlotte Lambreghts, Charlotte Bruneel, Eline Rusu, Dorina Vandenbroeck, Sofie Godderis, Lode BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Increasing rates of long-term sickness absence are a worldwide problem. Belgium is the first country in Europe that aims to screen its entire population of sick leavers (sick leave > 6 weeks) for the risk of long-term sickness absence in order to focus resources on the high-risk group and to provide adequate return-to-work support. Our aim was to investigate content and face validity of a newly designed questionnaire (Quickscan) using item prioritization of patients and professionals in the field of long-term sickness absence. This questionnaire was developed based on a review of the literature and existing instruments (Goorts et al, J Public Health Res 7:1419, 2018). METHODS: Qualitative data were collected using the nominal group technique. The data were gathered exploring factors that influence return-to work restrictions or opportunities. RESULTS: Participants indicated 20 out of 21 of the questionnaire factors as important reasons that might influence the return-to-work process. Additionally, 16 factors were discussed that were not yet included in the Quickscan but that might provide useful information on return-to-work issues, according to the participants. In the prioritization of items, we found considerable diversity among participants. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate the validity of the Quickscan items to ask patients about important return-to-work barriers or opportunities. However, additional factors were identified that may improve the assessment of risk for long-term sickness absence. BioMed Central 2019-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6842172/ /pubmed/31703629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0852-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Goorts, Kaat
Vanovenberghe, Charlotte
Lambreghts, Charlotte
Bruneel, Eline
Rusu, Dorina
Vandenbroeck, Sofie
Godderis, Lode
Assessment of long-term sickness absence: content and face validity of a new questionnaire based on qualitative data from nominal groups
title Assessment of long-term sickness absence: content and face validity of a new questionnaire based on qualitative data from nominal groups
title_full Assessment of long-term sickness absence: content and face validity of a new questionnaire based on qualitative data from nominal groups
title_fullStr Assessment of long-term sickness absence: content and face validity of a new questionnaire based on qualitative data from nominal groups
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of long-term sickness absence: content and face validity of a new questionnaire based on qualitative data from nominal groups
title_short Assessment of long-term sickness absence: content and face validity of a new questionnaire based on qualitative data from nominal groups
title_sort assessment of long-term sickness absence: content and face validity of a new questionnaire based on qualitative data from nominal groups
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6842172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31703629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0852-3
work_keys_str_mv AT goortskaat assessmentoflongtermsicknessabsencecontentandfacevalidityofanewquestionnairebasedonqualitativedatafromnominalgroups
AT vanovenberghecharlotte assessmentoflongtermsicknessabsencecontentandfacevalidityofanewquestionnairebasedonqualitativedatafromnominalgroups
AT lambreghtscharlotte assessmentoflongtermsicknessabsencecontentandfacevalidityofanewquestionnairebasedonqualitativedatafromnominalgroups
AT bruneeleline assessmentoflongtermsicknessabsencecontentandfacevalidityofanewquestionnairebasedonqualitativedatafromnominalgroups
AT rusudorina assessmentoflongtermsicknessabsencecontentandfacevalidityofanewquestionnairebasedonqualitativedatafromnominalgroups
AT vandenbroecksofie assessmentoflongtermsicknessabsencecontentandfacevalidityofanewquestionnairebasedonqualitativedatafromnominalgroups
AT godderislode assessmentoflongtermsicknessabsencecontentandfacevalidityofanewquestionnairebasedonqualitativedatafromnominalgroups