Cargando…
Assessment of long-term sickness absence: content and face validity of a new questionnaire based on qualitative data from nominal groups
BACKGROUND: Increasing rates of long-term sickness absence are a worldwide problem. Belgium is the first country in Europe that aims to screen its entire population of sick leavers (sick leave > 6 weeks) for the risk of long-term sickness absence in order to focus resources on the high-risk group...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6842172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31703629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0852-3 |
_version_ | 1783467996011823104 |
---|---|
author | Goorts, Kaat Vanovenberghe, Charlotte Lambreghts, Charlotte Bruneel, Eline Rusu, Dorina Vandenbroeck, Sofie Godderis, Lode |
author_facet | Goorts, Kaat Vanovenberghe, Charlotte Lambreghts, Charlotte Bruneel, Eline Rusu, Dorina Vandenbroeck, Sofie Godderis, Lode |
author_sort | Goorts, Kaat |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Increasing rates of long-term sickness absence are a worldwide problem. Belgium is the first country in Europe that aims to screen its entire population of sick leavers (sick leave > 6 weeks) for the risk of long-term sickness absence in order to focus resources on the high-risk group and to provide adequate return-to-work support. Our aim was to investigate content and face validity of a newly designed questionnaire (Quickscan) using item prioritization of patients and professionals in the field of long-term sickness absence. This questionnaire was developed based on a review of the literature and existing instruments (Goorts et al, J Public Health Res 7:1419, 2018). METHODS: Qualitative data were collected using the nominal group technique. The data were gathered exploring factors that influence return-to work restrictions or opportunities. RESULTS: Participants indicated 20 out of 21 of the questionnaire factors as important reasons that might influence the return-to-work process. Additionally, 16 factors were discussed that were not yet included in the Quickscan but that might provide useful information on return-to-work issues, according to the participants. In the prioritization of items, we found considerable diversity among participants. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate the validity of the Quickscan items to ask patients about important return-to-work barriers or opportunities. However, additional factors were identified that may improve the assessment of risk for long-term sickness absence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6842172 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68421722019-11-14 Assessment of long-term sickness absence: content and face validity of a new questionnaire based on qualitative data from nominal groups Goorts, Kaat Vanovenberghe, Charlotte Lambreghts, Charlotte Bruneel, Eline Rusu, Dorina Vandenbroeck, Sofie Godderis, Lode BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Increasing rates of long-term sickness absence are a worldwide problem. Belgium is the first country in Europe that aims to screen its entire population of sick leavers (sick leave > 6 weeks) for the risk of long-term sickness absence in order to focus resources on the high-risk group and to provide adequate return-to-work support. Our aim was to investigate content and face validity of a newly designed questionnaire (Quickscan) using item prioritization of patients and professionals in the field of long-term sickness absence. This questionnaire was developed based on a review of the literature and existing instruments (Goorts et al, J Public Health Res 7:1419, 2018). METHODS: Qualitative data were collected using the nominal group technique. The data were gathered exploring factors that influence return-to work restrictions or opportunities. RESULTS: Participants indicated 20 out of 21 of the questionnaire factors as important reasons that might influence the return-to-work process. Additionally, 16 factors were discussed that were not yet included in the Quickscan but that might provide useful information on return-to-work issues, according to the participants. In the prioritization of items, we found considerable diversity among participants. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate the validity of the Quickscan items to ask patients about important return-to-work barriers or opportunities. However, additional factors were identified that may improve the assessment of risk for long-term sickness absence. BioMed Central 2019-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6842172/ /pubmed/31703629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0852-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Goorts, Kaat Vanovenberghe, Charlotte Lambreghts, Charlotte Bruneel, Eline Rusu, Dorina Vandenbroeck, Sofie Godderis, Lode Assessment of long-term sickness absence: content and face validity of a new questionnaire based on qualitative data from nominal groups |
title | Assessment of long-term sickness absence: content and face validity of a new questionnaire based on qualitative data from nominal groups |
title_full | Assessment of long-term sickness absence: content and face validity of a new questionnaire based on qualitative data from nominal groups |
title_fullStr | Assessment of long-term sickness absence: content and face validity of a new questionnaire based on qualitative data from nominal groups |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of long-term sickness absence: content and face validity of a new questionnaire based on qualitative data from nominal groups |
title_short | Assessment of long-term sickness absence: content and face validity of a new questionnaire based on qualitative data from nominal groups |
title_sort | assessment of long-term sickness absence: content and face validity of a new questionnaire based on qualitative data from nominal groups |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6842172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31703629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0852-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goortskaat assessmentoflongtermsicknessabsencecontentandfacevalidityofanewquestionnairebasedonqualitativedatafromnominalgroups AT vanovenberghecharlotte assessmentoflongtermsicknessabsencecontentandfacevalidityofanewquestionnairebasedonqualitativedatafromnominalgroups AT lambreghtscharlotte assessmentoflongtermsicknessabsencecontentandfacevalidityofanewquestionnairebasedonqualitativedatafromnominalgroups AT bruneeleline assessmentoflongtermsicknessabsencecontentandfacevalidityofanewquestionnairebasedonqualitativedatafromnominalgroups AT rusudorina assessmentoflongtermsicknessabsencecontentandfacevalidityofanewquestionnairebasedonqualitativedatafromnominalgroups AT vandenbroecksofie assessmentoflongtermsicknessabsencecontentandfacevalidityofanewquestionnairebasedonqualitativedatafromnominalgroups AT godderislode assessmentoflongtermsicknessabsencecontentandfacevalidityofanewquestionnairebasedonqualitativedatafromnominalgroups |