Cargando…

The best treatment option(s) for adult and elderly patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Chronic primary musculoskeletal pain (CPMP) is one subcategory of the new classification of chronic primary pain for the upcoming ICD-11, defined as chronic pain in the muscles, bones, joints, or tendons that persists or recurs for more than 3 months and is associated with significant em...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koechlin, Helen, Whalley, Ben, Welton, Nicky J., Locher, Cosima
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6842192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31706330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1174-6
_version_ 1783468001362706432
author Koechlin, Helen
Whalley, Ben
Welton, Nicky J.
Locher, Cosima
author_facet Koechlin, Helen
Whalley, Ben
Welton, Nicky J.
Locher, Cosima
author_sort Koechlin, Helen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic primary musculoskeletal pain (CPMP) is one subcategory of the new classification of chronic primary pain for the upcoming ICD-11, defined as chronic pain in the muscles, bones, joints, or tendons that persists or recurs for more than 3 months and is associated with significant emotional distress or functional disability. An array of pharmacological, psychological, physical, complementary, and rehabilitative interventions is available for CPMP, for which previous research has demonstrated varying effect sizes with regard to effectiveness in pain reduction and other main outcomes. This highlights the need for the synthesis of all available evidence. The proposed network meta-analysis will compare all available interventions for CPMP to determine the best treatment option(s) with a focus on efficacy and safety of interventions. METHODS: We are interested in comparing interventions of the following types: psychological, pharmacological, physical, complementary, and rehabilitative interventions. We will include all randomized controlled trials that compare one intervention with another, or with a control group, in the treatment of CPMP. Primary efficacy outcomes will be pain intensity, emotional distress, and functional disability. Safety outcomes extracted will include proportion of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events, unwanted events, or drop-out rates due to side effects. Published and unpublished trials will be sought through the search of all relevant databases and trial registries. At least two independent reviewers of the team will select the references and extract data independently. We will assess the risk of bias of each individual study using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. We will conduct a network meta-analysis to synthesize all evidence for each outcome. We will fit our model primarily within a Bayesian framework. DISCUSSION: CPMP is a disabling condition for which several interventions exist. To our knowledge, this is the first network meta-analysis to systematically compare all available evidence. This is required by national health institutions to inform their decisions about the best available treatment option(s) with regard to efficacy and safety outcomes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018096114
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6842192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68421922019-11-14 The best treatment option(s) for adult and elderly patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis Koechlin, Helen Whalley, Ben Welton, Nicky J. Locher, Cosima Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Chronic primary musculoskeletal pain (CPMP) is one subcategory of the new classification of chronic primary pain for the upcoming ICD-11, defined as chronic pain in the muscles, bones, joints, or tendons that persists or recurs for more than 3 months and is associated with significant emotional distress or functional disability. An array of pharmacological, psychological, physical, complementary, and rehabilitative interventions is available for CPMP, for which previous research has demonstrated varying effect sizes with regard to effectiveness in pain reduction and other main outcomes. This highlights the need for the synthesis of all available evidence. The proposed network meta-analysis will compare all available interventions for CPMP to determine the best treatment option(s) with a focus on efficacy and safety of interventions. METHODS: We are interested in comparing interventions of the following types: psychological, pharmacological, physical, complementary, and rehabilitative interventions. We will include all randomized controlled trials that compare one intervention with another, or with a control group, in the treatment of CPMP. Primary efficacy outcomes will be pain intensity, emotional distress, and functional disability. Safety outcomes extracted will include proportion of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events, unwanted events, or drop-out rates due to side effects. Published and unpublished trials will be sought through the search of all relevant databases and trial registries. At least two independent reviewers of the team will select the references and extract data independently. We will assess the risk of bias of each individual study using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. We will conduct a network meta-analysis to synthesize all evidence for each outcome. We will fit our model primarily within a Bayesian framework. DISCUSSION: CPMP is a disabling condition for which several interventions exist. To our knowledge, this is the first network meta-analysis to systematically compare all available evidence. This is required by national health institutions to inform their decisions about the best available treatment option(s) with regard to efficacy and safety outcomes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018096114 BioMed Central 2019-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6842192/ /pubmed/31706330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1174-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Koechlin, Helen
Whalley, Ben
Welton, Nicky J.
Locher, Cosima
The best treatment option(s) for adult and elderly patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title The best treatment option(s) for adult and elderly patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full The best treatment option(s) for adult and elderly patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr The best treatment option(s) for adult and elderly patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The best treatment option(s) for adult and elderly patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short The best treatment option(s) for adult and elderly patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort best treatment option(s) for adult and elderly patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6842192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31706330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1174-6
work_keys_str_mv AT koechlinhelen thebesttreatmentoptionsforadultandelderlypatientswithchronicprimarymusculoskeletalpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT whalleyben thebesttreatmentoptionsforadultandelderlypatientswithchronicprimarymusculoskeletalpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT weltonnickyj thebesttreatmentoptionsforadultandelderlypatientswithchronicprimarymusculoskeletalpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT lochercosima thebesttreatmentoptionsforadultandelderlypatientswithchronicprimarymusculoskeletalpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT koechlinhelen besttreatmentoptionsforadultandelderlypatientswithchronicprimarymusculoskeletalpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT whalleyben besttreatmentoptionsforadultandelderlypatientswithchronicprimarymusculoskeletalpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT weltonnickyj besttreatmentoptionsforadultandelderlypatientswithchronicprimarymusculoskeletalpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT lochercosima besttreatmentoptionsforadultandelderlypatientswithchronicprimarymusculoskeletalpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis