Cargando…

Randomized Comparison Study of Novel Recombinant Human Antithrombin Gamma and Plasma-Derived Antithrombin in Healthy Volunteers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This paper describes two studies, which aimed to compare the safety and plasma antithrombin activity of recombinant human antithrombin gamma (rhAT-gamma) with plasma-derived antithrombin (pAT) 60 IU/kg, and to establish bioequivalence by adjusting the rhAT-gamma dose to tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Furuie, Hidetoshi, Kanda, Hironori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6842348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31493216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-019-00847-9
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This paper describes two studies, which aimed to compare the safety and plasma antithrombin activity of recombinant human antithrombin gamma (rhAT-gamma) with plasma-derived antithrombin (pAT) 60 IU/kg, and to establish bioequivalence by adjusting the rhAT-gamma dose to that at which plasma antithrombin activity equaled that for pAT 60 IU/kg, based on results of the first study. METHODS: Healthy adult men aged 20–45 years received once-daily doses of rhAT-gamma or pAT intravenously for 3 days (first study: 60 IU/kg of each; second study: 72 IU/kg of rhAT-gamma and 60 IU/kg of pAT). Maximum plasma antithrombin activity after three doses (C(max,day3)) and area under the plasma antithrombin activity-time curve after the third dose (AUC(48–t)) were analyzed. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: In the first study, we compared AUCs to 121 h (when the lower limit of quantification was first observed). Mean C(max,day3) was 1.67 IU/mL in the rhAT-gamma group and 1.77 IU/mL in the pAT group; mean AUC(48–121) was 58.44 and 71.94 IU·h/mL, respectively. Thus, we set the dose of rhAT-gamma in the second study to 72 IU/kg. As a result, ratios of C(max,day3) and AUC(48–t) in the rhAT-gamma vs. the pAT group were 105.7% (90% confidence interval 100.3, 111.3) and 100.5% (90% confidence interval 91.5, 110.4), respectively. Adverse events were more frequent in the rhAT-gamma group. CONCLUSIONS: As 90% confidence intervals for C(max,day3) and AUC(48–t) ratios for rhAT-gamma:pAT were within the acceptability range for bioequivalence, rhAT-gamma (72 IU/kg) and pAT (60 IU/kg) are considered bioequivalent. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40261-019-00847-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.