Cargando…
Minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is quickly becoming mainstream in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery because of presumed advantages. Surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is highly demanding which may hamper the feasibility and safety of MIS in this setting. This study aimed to systematicall...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer London
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6842355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31049774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00964-9 |
_version_ | 1783468036481613824 |
---|---|
author | Franken, L. C. van der Poel, M. J. Latenstein, A. E. J. Zwart, M. J. Roos, E. Busch, O. R. Besselink, M. G. van Gulik, T. M. |
author_facet | Franken, L. C. van der Poel, M. J. Latenstein, A. E. J. Zwart, M. J. Roos, E. Busch, O. R. Besselink, M. G. van Gulik, T. M. |
author_sort | Franken, L. C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is quickly becoming mainstream in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery because of presumed advantages. Surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is highly demanding which may hamper the feasibility and safety of MIS in this setting. This study aimed to systematically review the existing literature on MIS for PHC. A systematic literature review was performed according to the PRISMA statement. The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched and all studies describing MIS in patients with PHC were included. Data extraction and risk of bias were assessed by two independent researchers. Overall, 21 studies reporting on a total of 142 MIS procedures for PHC were included. These included 82 laparoscopic, 59 robot-assisted and 1 hybrid procedure(s). Risk of bias was deemed substantial. Pooled conversion rate was 7/142 (4.9%), pooled morbidity 30/126 (23.8%), and pooled mortality rate 4/126 (3.2%). The only comparative study, comparing 10 robot-assisted procedures to 32 open procedures, reported a significant increased operative time and higher morbidity rate with MIS. The available evidence on MIS for PHC is limited and generally of poor quality. This systematic review shows that the implementation of MIS for patients with PHC is still in its infancy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6842355 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68423552019-11-22 Minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review Franken, L. C. van der Poel, M. J. Latenstein, A. E. J. Zwart, M. J. Roos, E. Busch, O. R. Besselink, M. G. van Gulik, T. M. J Robot Surg Review Article Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is quickly becoming mainstream in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery because of presumed advantages. Surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is highly demanding which may hamper the feasibility and safety of MIS in this setting. This study aimed to systematically review the existing literature on MIS for PHC. A systematic literature review was performed according to the PRISMA statement. The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched and all studies describing MIS in patients with PHC were included. Data extraction and risk of bias were assessed by two independent researchers. Overall, 21 studies reporting on a total of 142 MIS procedures for PHC were included. These included 82 laparoscopic, 59 robot-assisted and 1 hybrid procedure(s). Risk of bias was deemed substantial. Pooled conversion rate was 7/142 (4.9%), pooled morbidity 30/126 (23.8%), and pooled mortality rate 4/126 (3.2%). The only comparative study, comparing 10 robot-assisted procedures to 32 open procedures, reported a significant increased operative time and higher morbidity rate with MIS. The available evidence on MIS for PHC is limited and generally of poor quality. This systematic review shows that the implementation of MIS for patients with PHC is still in its infancy. Springer London 2019-05-02 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6842355/ /pubmed/31049774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00964-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Franken, L. C. van der Poel, M. J. Latenstein, A. E. J. Zwart, M. J. Roos, E. Busch, O. R. Besselink, M. G. van Gulik, T. M. Minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review |
title | Minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review |
title_full | Minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review |
title_short | Minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review |
title_sort | minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6842355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31049774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00964-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT frankenlc minimallyinvasivesurgeryforperihilarcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview AT vanderpoelmj minimallyinvasivesurgeryforperihilarcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview AT latensteinaej minimallyinvasivesurgeryforperihilarcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview AT zwartmj minimallyinvasivesurgeryforperihilarcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview AT roose minimallyinvasivesurgeryforperihilarcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview AT buschor minimallyinvasivesurgeryforperihilarcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview AT besselinkmg minimallyinvasivesurgeryforperihilarcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview AT vanguliktm minimallyinvasivesurgeryforperihilarcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview |