Cargando…

Minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is quickly becoming mainstream in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery because of presumed advantages. Surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is highly demanding which may hamper the feasibility and safety of MIS in this setting. This study aimed to systematicall...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Franken, L. C., van der Poel, M. J., Latenstein, A. E. J., Zwart, M. J., Roos, E., Busch, O. R., Besselink, M. G., van Gulik, T. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6842355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31049774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00964-9
_version_ 1783468036481613824
author Franken, L. C.
van der Poel, M. J.
Latenstein, A. E. J.
Zwart, M. J.
Roos, E.
Busch, O. R.
Besselink, M. G.
van Gulik, T. M.
author_facet Franken, L. C.
van der Poel, M. J.
Latenstein, A. E. J.
Zwart, M. J.
Roos, E.
Busch, O. R.
Besselink, M. G.
van Gulik, T. M.
author_sort Franken, L. C.
collection PubMed
description Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is quickly becoming mainstream in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery because of presumed advantages. Surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is highly demanding which may hamper the feasibility and safety of MIS in this setting. This study aimed to systematically review the existing literature on MIS for PHC. A systematic literature review was performed according to the PRISMA statement. The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched and all studies describing MIS in patients with PHC were included. Data extraction and risk of bias were assessed by two independent researchers. Overall, 21 studies reporting on a total of 142 MIS procedures for PHC were included. These included 82 laparoscopic, 59 robot-assisted and 1 hybrid procedure(s). Risk of bias was deemed substantial. Pooled conversion rate was 7/142 (4.9%), pooled morbidity 30/126 (23.8%), and pooled mortality rate 4/126 (3.2%). The only comparative study, comparing 10 robot-assisted procedures to 32 open procedures, reported a significant increased operative time and higher morbidity rate with MIS. The available evidence on MIS for PHC is limited and generally of poor quality. This systematic review shows that the implementation of MIS for patients with PHC is still in its infancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6842355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68423552019-11-22 Minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review Franken, L. C. van der Poel, M. J. Latenstein, A. E. J. Zwart, M. J. Roos, E. Busch, O. R. Besselink, M. G. van Gulik, T. M. J Robot Surg Review Article Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is quickly becoming mainstream in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery because of presumed advantages. Surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is highly demanding which may hamper the feasibility and safety of MIS in this setting. This study aimed to systematically review the existing literature on MIS for PHC. A systematic literature review was performed according to the PRISMA statement. The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched and all studies describing MIS in patients with PHC were included. Data extraction and risk of bias were assessed by two independent researchers. Overall, 21 studies reporting on a total of 142 MIS procedures for PHC were included. These included 82 laparoscopic, 59 robot-assisted and 1 hybrid procedure(s). Risk of bias was deemed substantial. Pooled conversion rate was 7/142 (4.9%), pooled morbidity 30/126 (23.8%), and pooled mortality rate 4/126 (3.2%). The only comparative study, comparing 10 robot-assisted procedures to 32 open procedures, reported a significant increased operative time and higher morbidity rate with MIS. The available evidence on MIS for PHC is limited and generally of poor quality. This systematic review shows that the implementation of MIS for patients with PHC is still in its infancy. Springer London 2019-05-02 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6842355/ /pubmed/31049774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00964-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Article
Franken, L. C.
van der Poel, M. J.
Latenstein, A. E. J.
Zwart, M. J.
Roos, E.
Busch, O. R.
Besselink, M. G.
van Gulik, T. M.
Minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review
title Minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review
title_full Minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review
title_fullStr Minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review
title_short Minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review
title_sort minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6842355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31049774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00964-9
work_keys_str_mv AT frankenlc minimallyinvasivesurgeryforperihilarcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview
AT vanderpoelmj minimallyinvasivesurgeryforperihilarcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview
AT latensteinaej minimallyinvasivesurgeryforperihilarcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview
AT zwartmj minimallyinvasivesurgeryforperihilarcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview
AT roose minimallyinvasivesurgeryforperihilarcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview
AT buschor minimallyinvasivesurgeryforperihilarcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview
AT besselinkmg minimallyinvasivesurgeryforperihilarcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview
AT vanguliktm minimallyinvasivesurgeryforperihilarcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview