Cargando…
Effects of Combined Tracheal Suctioning and Expiratory Pause: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial
AIMS: Our aim is to compare volume of suctioned secretion, respiratory mechanics, and hemodynamic parameters in intubated patients undergoing closed-system endotracheal suctioning alone (control group) versus closed-system tracheal suctioning with an expiratory pause (intervention group). SETTINGS A...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6842827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31749553 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23263 |
_version_ | 1783468097776123904 |
---|---|
author | de Fraga Gomes Martins, Luciane da Silva Naue, Wagner Skueresky, Amanda Soares Bianchi, Tanara Dias, Alexandre Simões Forgiarini, Luiz Alberto |
author_facet | de Fraga Gomes Martins, Luciane da Silva Naue, Wagner Skueresky, Amanda Soares Bianchi, Tanara Dias, Alexandre Simões Forgiarini, Luiz Alberto |
author_sort | de Fraga Gomes Martins, Luciane |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Our aim is to compare volume of suctioned secretion, respiratory mechanics, and hemodynamic parameters in intubated patients undergoing closed-system endotracheal suctioning alone (control group) versus closed-system tracheal suctioning with an expiratory pause (intervention group). SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Randomized crossover clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who had been on mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours were randomly assigned to receive closed-system suctioning alone or closed-system suctioning with an expiratory pause on the ventilator. The following variables were evaluated: heart rate, respiratory rate, mean arterial pressure, peripheral arterial oxygen saturation, peak inspiratory pressure, mechanical ventilator circuit pressure during aspiration, exhaled tidal volume, dynamic compliance, resistance, and weight of suctioned secretion. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Compared using the paired t-test and general linear model analysis of variance for normally distributed variables (as confirmed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test). The Wilcoxon test was used for variables with a nonparametric distribution, while the Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used for categorical variables. RESULTS: The sample comprised 31 patients (mean age, 61.1 ± 18.2 years). The amount of secretion suctioned was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (1.6 g vs 0.45 g; p = 0.0001). There were no significant changes in hemodynamic parameters or respiratory mechanics when comparing pre- and postprocedure time points. CONCLUSION: The combination of closed-system endotracheal suctioning and an expiratory pause significantly increased the amount of secretion suctioned compared to conventional suctioning without expiratory pause. KEY MESSAGES: Combination of closed-system endotracheal suctioning and an expiratory pause significantly increased the amount of secretion suctioned. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Martins LFG, Naue WS, Skueresky AS, Bianchi T, Dias AS, Forgiarini Junior LA. Effects of Combined Tracheal Suctioning and Expiratory Pause: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial. Indian J Crit Care Med 2019;23(10):454–457. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6842827 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68428272019-11-20 Effects of Combined Tracheal Suctioning and Expiratory Pause: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial de Fraga Gomes Martins, Luciane da Silva Naue, Wagner Skueresky, Amanda Soares Bianchi, Tanara Dias, Alexandre Simões Forgiarini, Luiz Alberto Indian J Crit Care Med Original Article AIMS: Our aim is to compare volume of suctioned secretion, respiratory mechanics, and hemodynamic parameters in intubated patients undergoing closed-system endotracheal suctioning alone (control group) versus closed-system tracheal suctioning with an expiratory pause (intervention group). SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Randomized crossover clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who had been on mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours were randomly assigned to receive closed-system suctioning alone or closed-system suctioning with an expiratory pause on the ventilator. The following variables were evaluated: heart rate, respiratory rate, mean arterial pressure, peripheral arterial oxygen saturation, peak inspiratory pressure, mechanical ventilator circuit pressure during aspiration, exhaled tidal volume, dynamic compliance, resistance, and weight of suctioned secretion. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Compared using the paired t-test and general linear model analysis of variance for normally distributed variables (as confirmed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test). The Wilcoxon test was used for variables with a nonparametric distribution, while the Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used for categorical variables. RESULTS: The sample comprised 31 patients (mean age, 61.1 ± 18.2 years). The amount of secretion suctioned was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (1.6 g vs 0.45 g; p = 0.0001). There were no significant changes in hemodynamic parameters or respiratory mechanics when comparing pre- and postprocedure time points. CONCLUSION: The combination of closed-system endotracheal suctioning and an expiratory pause significantly increased the amount of secretion suctioned compared to conventional suctioning without expiratory pause. KEY MESSAGES: Combination of closed-system endotracheal suctioning and an expiratory pause significantly increased the amount of secretion suctioned. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Martins LFG, Naue WS, Skueresky AS, Bianchi T, Dias AS, Forgiarini Junior LA. Effects of Combined Tracheal Suctioning and Expiratory Pause: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial. Indian J Crit Care Med 2019;23(10):454–457. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6842827/ /pubmed/31749553 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23263 Text en Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Article de Fraga Gomes Martins, Luciane da Silva Naue, Wagner Skueresky, Amanda Soares Bianchi, Tanara Dias, Alexandre Simões Forgiarini, Luiz Alberto Effects of Combined Tracheal Suctioning and Expiratory Pause: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial |
title | Effects of Combined Tracheal Suctioning and Expiratory Pause: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full | Effects of Combined Tracheal Suctioning and Expiratory Pause: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Effects of Combined Tracheal Suctioning and Expiratory Pause: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of Combined Tracheal Suctioning and Expiratory Pause: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_short | Effects of Combined Tracheal Suctioning and Expiratory Pause: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_sort | effects of combined tracheal suctioning and expiratory pause: a crossover randomized clinical trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6842827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31749553 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23263 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT defragagomesmartinsluciane effectsofcombinedtrachealsuctioningandexpiratorypauseacrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial AT dasilvanauewagner effectsofcombinedtrachealsuctioningandexpiratorypauseacrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial AT skuereskyamandasoares effectsofcombinedtrachealsuctioningandexpiratorypauseacrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial AT bianchitanara effectsofcombinedtrachealsuctioningandexpiratorypauseacrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial AT diasalexandresimoes effectsofcombinedtrachealsuctioningandexpiratorypauseacrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial AT forgiariniluizalberto effectsofcombinedtrachealsuctioningandexpiratorypauseacrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial |