Cargando…

Effects of Combined Tracheal Suctioning and Expiratory Pause: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial

AIMS: Our aim is to compare volume of suctioned secretion, respiratory mechanics, and hemodynamic parameters in intubated patients undergoing closed-system endotracheal suctioning alone (control group) versus closed-system tracheal suctioning with an expiratory pause (intervention group). SETTINGS A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Fraga Gomes Martins, Luciane, da Silva Naue, Wagner, Skueresky, Amanda Soares, Bianchi, Tanara, Dias, Alexandre Simões, Forgiarini, Luiz Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6842827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31749553
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23263
_version_ 1783468097776123904
author de Fraga Gomes Martins, Luciane
da Silva Naue, Wagner
Skueresky, Amanda Soares
Bianchi, Tanara
Dias, Alexandre Simões
Forgiarini, Luiz Alberto
author_facet de Fraga Gomes Martins, Luciane
da Silva Naue, Wagner
Skueresky, Amanda Soares
Bianchi, Tanara
Dias, Alexandre Simões
Forgiarini, Luiz Alberto
author_sort de Fraga Gomes Martins, Luciane
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Our aim is to compare volume of suctioned secretion, respiratory mechanics, and hemodynamic parameters in intubated patients undergoing closed-system endotracheal suctioning alone (control group) versus closed-system tracheal suctioning with an expiratory pause (intervention group). SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Randomized crossover clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who had been on mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours were randomly assigned to receive closed-system suctioning alone or closed-system suctioning with an expiratory pause on the ventilator. The following variables were evaluated: heart rate, respiratory rate, mean arterial pressure, peripheral arterial oxygen saturation, peak inspiratory pressure, mechanical ventilator circuit pressure during aspiration, exhaled tidal volume, dynamic compliance, resistance, and weight of suctioned secretion. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Compared using the paired t-test and general linear model analysis of variance for normally distributed variables (as confirmed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test). The Wilcoxon test was used for variables with a nonparametric distribution, while the Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used for categorical variables. RESULTS: The sample comprised 31 patients (mean age, 61.1 ± 18.2 years). The amount of secretion suctioned was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (1.6 g vs 0.45 g; p = 0.0001). There were no significant changes in hemodynamic parameters or respiratory mechanics when comparing pre- and postprocedure time points. CONCLUSION: The combination of closed-system endotracheal suctioning and an expiratory pause significantly increased the amount of secretion suctioned compared to conventional suctioning without expiratory pause. KEY MESSAGES: Combination of closed-system endotracheal suctioning and an expiratory pause significantly increased the amount of secretion suctioned. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Martins LFG, Naue WS, Skueresky AS, Bianchi T, Dias AS, Forgiarini Junior LA. Effects of Combined Tracheal Suctioning and Expiratory Pause: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial. Indian J Crit Care Med 2019;23(10):454–457.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6842827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68428272019-11-20 Effects of Combined Tracheal Suctioning and Expiratory Pause: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial de Fraga Gomes Martins, Luciane da Silva Naue, Wagner Skueresky, Amanda Soares Bianchi, Tanara Dias, Alexandre Simões Forgiarini, Luiz Alberto Indian J Crit Care Med Original Article AIMS: Our aim is to compare volume of suctioned secretion, respiratory mechanics, and hemodynamic parameters in intubated patients undergoing closed-system endotracheal suctioning alone (control group) versus closed-system tracheal suctioning with an expiratory pause (intervention group). SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Randomized crossover clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who had been on mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours were randomly assigned to receive closed-system suctioning alone or closed-system suctioning with an expiratory pause on the ventilator. The following variables were evaluated: heart rate, respiratory rate, mean arterial pressure, peripheral arterial oxygen saturation, peak inspiratory pressure, mechanical ventilator circuit pressure during aspiration, exhaled tidal volume, dynamic compliance, resistance, and weight of suctioned secretion. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Compared using the paired t-test and general linear model analysis of variance for normally distributed variables (as confirmed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test). The Wilcoxon test was used for variables with a nonparametric distribution, while the Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used for categorical variables. RESULTS: The sample comprised 31 patients (mean age, 61.1 ± 18.2 years). The amount of secretion suctioned was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (1.6 g vs 0.45 g; p = 0.0001). There were no significant changes in hemodynamic parameters or respiratory mechanics when comparing pre- and postprocedure time points. CONCLUSION: The combination of closed-system endotracheal suctioning and an expiratory pause significantly increased the amount of secretion suctioned compared to conventional suctioning without expiratory pause. KEY MESSAGES: Combination of closed-system endotracheal suctioning and an expiratory pause significantly increased the amount of secretion suctioned. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Martins LFG, Naue WS, Skueresky AS, Bianchi T, Dias AS, Forgiarini Junior LA. Effects of Combined Tracheal Suctioning and Expiratory Pause: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial. Indian J Crit Care Med 2019;23(10):454–457. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6842827/ /pubmed/31749553 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23263 Text en Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Article
de Fraga Gomes Martins, Luciane
da Silva Naue, Wagner
Skueresky, Amanda Soares
Bianchi, Tanara
Dias, Alexandre Simões
Forgiarini, Luiz Alberto
Effects of Combined Tracheal Suctioning and Expiratory Pause: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial
title Effects of Combined Tracheal Suctioning and Expiratory Pause: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Effects of Combined Tracheal Suctioning and Expiratory Pause: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Effects of Combined Tracheal Suctioning and Expiratory Pause: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Combined Tracheal Suctioning and Expiratory Pause: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Effects of Combined Tracheal Suctioning and Expiratory Pause: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort effects of combined tracheal suctioning and expiratory pause: a crossover randomized clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6842827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31749553
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23263
work_keys_str_mv AT defragagomesmartinsluciane effectsofcombinedtrachealsuctioningandexpiratorypauseacrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT dasilvanauewagner effectsofcombinedtrachealsuctioningandexpiratorypauseacrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT skuereskyamandasoares effectsofcombinedtrachealsuctioningandexpiratorypauseacrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT bianchitanara effectsofcombinedtrachealsuctioningandexpiratorypauseacrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT diasalexandresimoes effectsofcombinedtrachealsuctioningandexpiratorypauseacrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT forgiariniluizalberto effectsofcombinedtrachealsuctioningandexpiratorypauseacrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial