Cargando…
The Role of the Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Interstitial Lung Diseases: Systematic Literature Review of the Current Evidence and Future Perspectives
The opportunity of a multidisciplinary evaluation for the diagnosis of interstitial pneumonias highlighted a major change in the diagnostic approach to diffuse lung disease. The new American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Latin American Thoracic Soc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6842981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31750308 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00246 |
_version_ | 1783468118842015744 |
---|---|
author | Furini, Federica Carnevale, Aldo Casoni, Gian Luca Guerrini, Giulio Cavagna, Lorenzo Govoni, Marcello Sciré, Carlo Alberto |
author_facet | Furini, Federica Carnevale, Aldo Casoni, Gian Luca Guerrini, Giulio Cavagna, Lorenzo Govoni, Marcello Sciré, Carlo Alberto |
author_sort | Furini, Federica |
collection | PubMed |
description | The opportunity of a multidisciplinary evaluation for the diagnosis of interstitial pneumonias highlighted a major change in the diagnostic approach to diffuse lung disease. The new American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Latin American Thoracic Society guidelines for the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis have reinforced this assumption and have underlined that the exclusion of connective tissue disease related lung involvement is mandatory, with obvious clinical and therapeutic impact. The multidisciplinary team discussion consists in a moment of interaction among the radiologist, pathologist and pulmonologist, also including the rheumatologist when considered necessary, to improve diagnostic agreement and optimize the definition of those cases in which pulmonary involvement may represent the first or prominent manifestation of an autoimmune systemic disease. Moreover, the proposal of classification criteria for interstitial lung disease with autoimmune features (IPAF) represents an effort to define lung involvement in clinically undefined autoimmune conditions. The complexity of autoimmune diseases, and in particular the lack of classification criteria defined for pathologies such as anti-synthetase syndrome, makes the involvement of the rheumatologist essential for the correct interpretation of the autoimmune element and for the application of classification criteria, that could replace clinical pictures initially interpreted as IPAF in defined autoimmune disease, minimizing the risk of misdiagnosis. The aim of this review was to evaluate the available evidence about the efficiency and efficacy of different multidisciplinary team approaches, in order to standardize the professional figures and the core set procedures that should be necessary for a correct approach in diagnosing patients with interstitial lung disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6842981 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68429812019-11-20 The Role of the Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Interstitial Lung Diseases: Systematic Literature Review of the Current Evidence and Future Perspectives Furini, Federica Carnevale, Aldo Casoni, Gian Luca Guerrini, Giulio Cavagna, Lorenzo Govoni, Marcello Sciré, Carlo Alberto Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine The opportunity of a multidisciplinary evaluation for the diagnosis of interstitial pneumonias highlighted a major change in the diagnostic approach to diffuse lung disease. The new American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Latin American Thoracic Society guidelines for the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis have reinforced this assumption and have underlined that the exclusion of connective tissue disease related lung involvement is mandatory, with obvious clinical and therapeutic impact. The multidisciplinary team discussion consists in a moment of interaction among the radiologist, pathologist and pulmonologist, also including the rheumatologist when considered necessary, to improve diagnostic agreement and optimize the definition of those cases in which pulmonary involvement may represent the first or prominent manifestation of an autoimmune systemic disease. Moreover, the proposal of classification criteria for interstitial lung disease with autoimmune features (IPAF) represents an effort to define lung involvement in clinically undefined autoimmune conditions. The complexity of autoimmune diseases, and in particular the lack of classification criteria defined for pathologies such as anti-synthetase syndrome, makes the involvement of the rheumatologist essential for the correct interpretation of the autoimmune element and for the application of classification criteria, that could replace clinical pictures initially interpreted as IPAF in defined autoimmune disease, minimizing the risk of misdiagnosis. The aim of this review was to evaluate the available evidence about the efficiency and efficacy of different multidisciplinary team approaches, in order to standardize the professional figures and the core set procedures that should be necessary for a correct approach in diagnosing patients with interstitial lung disease. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6842981/ /pubmed/31750308 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00246 Text en Copyright © 2019 Furini, Carnevale, Casoni, Guerrini, Cavagna, Govoni and Sciré. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Furini, Federica Carnevale, Aldo Casoni, Gian Luca Guerrini, Giulio Cavagna, Lorenzo Govoni, Marcello Sciré, Carlo Alberto The Role of the Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Interstitial Lung Diseases: Systematic Literature Review of the Current Evidence and Future Perspectives |
title | The Role of the Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Interstitial Lung Diseases: Systematic Literature Review of the Current Evidence and Future Perspectives |
title_full | The Role of the Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Interstitial Lung Diseases: Systematic Literature Review of the Current Evidence and Future Perspectives |
title_fullStr | The Role of the Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Interstitial Lung Diseases: Systematic Literature Review of the Current Evidence and Future Perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed | The Role of the Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Interstitial Lung Diseases: Systematic Literature Review of the Current Evidence and Future Perspectives |
title_short | The Role of the Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Interstitial Lung Diseases: Systematic Literature Review of the Current Evidence and Future Perspectives |
title_sort | role of the multidisciplinary evaluation of interstitial lung diseases: systematic literature review of the current evidence and future perspectives |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6842981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31750308 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00246 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT furinifederica theroleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT carnevalealdo theroleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT casonigianluca theroleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT guerrinigiulio theroleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT cavagnalorenzo theroleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT govonimarcello theroleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT scirecarloalberto theroleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT furinifederica roleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT carnevalealdo roleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT casonigianluca roleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT guerrinigiulio roleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT cavagnalorenzo roleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT govonimarcello roleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT scirecarloalberto roleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives |