Cargando…

The Role of the Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Interstitial Lung Diseases: Systematic Literature Review of the Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

The opportunity of a multidisciplinary evaluation for the diagnosis of interstitial pneumonias highlighted a major change in the diagnostic approach to diffuse lung disease. The new American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Latin American Thoracic Soc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Furini, Federica, Carnevale, Aldo, Casoni, Gian Luca, Guerrini, Giulio, Cavagna, Lorenzo, Govoni, Marcello, Sciré, Carlo Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6842981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31750308
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00246
_version_ 1783468118842015744
author Furini, Federica
Carnevale, Aldo
Casoni, Gian Luca
Guerrini, Giulio
Cavagna, Lorenzo
Govoni, Marcello
Sciré, Carlo Alberto
author_facet Furini, Federica
Carnevale, Aldo
Casoni, Gian Luca
Guerrini, Giulio
Cavagna, Lorenzo
Govoni, Marcello
Sciré, Carlo Alberto
author_sort Furini, Federica
collection PubMed
description The opportunity of a multidisciplinary evaluation for the diagnosis of interstitial pneumonias highlighted a major change in the diagnostic approach to diffuse lung disease. The new American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Latin American Thoracic Society guidelines for the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis have reinforced this assumption and have underlined that the exclusion of connective tissue disease related lung involvement is mandatory, with obvious clinical and therapeutic impact. The multidisciplinary team discussion consists in a moment of interaction among the radiologist, pathologist and pulmonologist, also including the rheumatologist when considered necessary, to improve diagnostic agreement and optimize the definition of those cases in which pulmonary involvement may represent the first or prominent manifestation of an autoimmune systemic disease. Moreover, the proposal of classification criteria for interstitial lung disease with autoimmune features (IPAF) represents an effort to define lung involvement in clinically undefined autoimmune conditions. The complexity of autoimmune diseases, and in particular the lack of classification criteria defined for pathologies such as anti-synthetase syndrome, makes the involvement of the rheumatologist essential for the correct interpretation of the autoimmune element and for the application of classification criteria, that could replace clinical pictures initially interpreted as IPAF in defined autoimmune disease, minimizing the risk of misdiagnosis. The aim of this review was to evaluate the available evidence about the efficiency and efficacy of different multidisciplinary team approaches, in order to standardize the professional figures and the core set procedures that should be necessary for a correct approach in diagnosing patients with interstitial lung disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6842981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68429812019-11-20 The Role of the Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Interstitial Lung Diseases: Systematic Literature Review of the Current Evidence and Future Perspectives Furini, Federica Carnevale, Aldo Casoni, Gian Luca Guerrini, Giulio Cavagna, Lorenzo Govoni, Marcello Sciré, Carlo Alberto Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine The opportunity of a multidisciplinary evaluation for the diagnosis of interstitial pneumonias highlighted a major change in the diagnostic approach to diffuse lung disease. The new American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Latin American Thoracic Society guidelines for the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis have reinforced this assumption and have underlined that the exclusion of connective tissue disease related lung involvement is mandatory, with obvious clinical and therapeutic impact. The multidisciplinary team discussion consists in a moment of interaction among the radiologist, pathologist and pulmonologist, also including the rheumatologist when considered necessary, to improve diagnostic agreement and optimize the definition of those cases in which pulmonary involvement may represent the first or prominent manifestation of an autoimmune systemic disease. Moreover, the proposal of classification criteria for interstitial lung disease with autoimmune features (IPAF) represents an effort to define lung involvement in clinically undefined autoimmune conditions. The complexity of autoimmune diseases, and in particular the lack of classification criteria defined for pathologies such as anti-synthetase syndrome, makes the involvement of the rheumatologist essential for the correct interpretation of the autoimmune element and for the application of classification criteria, that could replace clinical pictures initially interpreted as IPAF in defined autoimmune disease, minimizing the risk of misdiagnosis. The aim of this review was to evaluate the available evidence about the efficiency and efficacy of different multidisciplinary team approaches, in order to standardize the professional figures and the core set procedures that should be necessary for a correct approach in diagnosing patients with interstitial lung disease. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6842981/ /pubmed/31750308 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00246 Text en Copyright © 2019 Furini, Carnevale, Casoni, Guerrini, Cavagna, Govoni and Sciré. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Furini, Federica
Carnevale, Aldo
Casoni, Gian Luca
Guerrini, Giulio
Cavagna, Lorenzo
Govoni, Marcello
Sciré, Carlo Alberto
The Role of the Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Interstitial Lung Diseases: Systematic Literature Review of the Current Evidence and Future Perspectives
title The Role of the Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Interstitial Lung Diseases: Systematic Literature Review of the Current Evidence and Future Perspectives
title_full The Role of the Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Interstitial Lung Diseases: Systematic Literature Review of the Current Evidence and Future Perspectives
title_fullStr The Role of the Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Interstitial Lung Diseases: Systematic Literature Review of the Current Evidence and Future Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed The Role of the Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Interstitial Lung Diseases: Systematic Literature Review of the Current Evidence and Future Perspectives
title_short The Role of the Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Interstitial Lung Diseases: Systematic Literature Review of the Current Evidence and Future Perspectives
title_sort role of the multidisciplinary evaluation of interstitial lung diseases: systematic literature review of the current evidence and future perspectives
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6842981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31750308
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00246
work_keys_str_mv AT furinifederica theroleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT carnevalealdo theroleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT casonigianluca theroleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT guerrinigiulio theroleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT cavagnalorenzo theroleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT govonimarcello theroleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT scirecarloalberto theroleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT furinifederica roleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT carnevalealdo roleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT casonigianluca roleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT guerrinigiulio roleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT cavagnalorenzo roleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT govonimarcello roleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT scirecarloalberto roleofthemultidisciplinaryevaluationofinterstitiallungdiseasessystematicliteraturereviewofthecurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives