Cargando…

Influence of Intensity RAMP Incremental Test on Peak Power, Post-Exercise Blood Lactate, and Heart Rate Recovery in Males: Cross-Over Study

Background: The linearly increased loading (RAMP) incremental test is a method commonly used to evaluate physical performance in a laboratory, but the best-designed protocol remains unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the selected variables used in training control resulting from the two d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michalik, Kamil, Korta, Kuba, Danek, Natalia, Smolarek, Marcin, Zatoń, Marek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6843469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31623132
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203934
_version_ 1783468222933106688
author Michalik, Kamil
Korta, Kuba
Danek, Natalia
Smolarek, Marcin
Zatoń, Marek
author_facet Michalik, Kamil
Korta, Kuba
Danek, Natalia
Smolarek, Marcin
Zatoń, Marek
author_sort Michalik, Kamil
collection PubMed
description Background: The linearly increased loading (RAMP) incremental test is a method commonly used to evaluate physical performance in a laboratory, but the best-designed protocol remains unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the selected variables used in training control resulting from the two different intensities of RAMP incremental tests. Methods: Twenty healthy and physically active men took part in this experiment. The tests included two visits to a laboratory, during which anthropometric measurements, incremental test on a cycle ergometer, and examinations of heart rate and blood lactate concentration were made. The cross-over study design method was used. The subjects underwent a randomly selected RAMP test with incremental load: 0.278 W·s(−1) or 0.556 W·s(−1). They performed the second test a week later. Results: Peak power output was significantly higher by 51.69 W (p < 0.001; t = 13.10; ES = 1.13) in the 0.556 W·s(−1) group. Total work done was significantly higher in the 0.278 W·s(−1) group by 71.93 kJ (p < 0.001; t = 12.55; ES = 1.57). Maximal heart rate was significantly higher in the 0.278 W·s(−1) group by 3.30 bpm (p < 0.01; t = 3.72; ES = 0.48). There were no statistically significant differences in heart rate recovery and peak blood lactate. Conclusions: We recommend use of the 0.556 W·s(−1) RAMP protocol because it is of shorter duration compared with 0.278 W·s(−1) and as such practically easier and of less effort for subjects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6843469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68434692019-11-25 Influence of Intensity RAMP Incremental Test on Peak Power, Post-Exercise Blood Lactate, and Heart Rate Recovery in Males: Cross-Over Study Michalik, Kamil Korta, Kuba Danek, Natalia Smolarek, Marcin Zatoń, Marek Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: The linearly increased loading (RAMP) incremental test is a method commonly used to evaluate physical performance in a laboratory, but the best-designed protocol remains unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the selected variables used in training control resulting from the two different intensities of RAMP incremental tests. Methods: Twenty healthy and physically active men took part in this experiment. The tests included two visits to a laboratory, during which anthropometric measurements, incremental test on a cycle ergometer, and examinations of heart rate and blood lactate concentration were made. The cross-over study design method was used. The subjects underwent a randomly selected RAMP test with incremental load: 0.278 W·s(−1) or 0.556 W·s(−1). They performed the second test a week later. Results: Peak power output was significantly higher by 51.69 W (p < 0.001; t = 13.10; ES = 1.13) in the 0.556 W·s(−1) group. Total work done was significantly higher in the 0.278 W·s(−1) group by 71.93 kJ (p < 0.001; t = 12.55; ES = 1.57). Maximal heart rate was significantly higher in the 0.278 W·s(−1) group by 3.30 bpm (p < 0.01; t = 3.72; ES = 0.48). There were no statistically significant differences in heart rate recovery and peak blood lactate. Conclusions: We recommend use of the 0.556 W·s(−1) RAMP protocol because it is of shorter duration compared with 0.278 W·s(−1) and as such practically easier and of less effort for subjects. MDPI 2019-10-16 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6843469/ /pubmed/31623132 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203934 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Michalik, Kamil
Korta, Kuba
Danek, Natalia
Smolarek, Marcin
Zatoń, Marek
Influence of Intensity RAMP Incremental Test on Peak Power, Post-Exercise Blood Lactate, and Heart Rate Recovery in Males: Cross-Over Study
title Influence of Intensity RAMP Incremental Test on Peak Power, Post-Exercise Blood Lactate, and Heart Rate Recovery in Males: Cross-Over Study
title_full Influence of Intensity RAMP Incremental Test on Peak Power, Post-Exercise Blood Lactate, and Heart Rate Recovery in Males: Cross-Over Study
title_fullStr Influence of Intensity RAMP Incremental Test on Peak Power, Post-Exercise Blood Lactate, and Heart Rate Recovery in Males: Cross-Over Study
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Intensity RAMP Incremental Test on Peak Power, Post-Exercise Blood Lactate, and Heart Rate Recovery in Males: Cross-Over Study
title_short Influence of Intensity RAMP Incremental Test on Peak Power, Post-Exercise Blood Lactate, and Heart Rate Recovery in Males: Cross-Over Study
title_sort influence of intensity ramp incremental test on peak power, post-exercise blood lactate, and heart rate recovery in males: cross-over study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6843469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31623132
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203934
work_keys_str_mv AT michalikkamil influenceofintensityrampincrementaltestonpeakpowerpostexercisebloodlactateandheartraterecoveryinmalescrossoverstudy
AT kortakuba influenceofintensityrampincrementaltestonpeakpowerpostexercisebloodlactateandheartraterecoveryinmalescrossoverstudy
AT daneknatalia influenceofintensityrampincrementaltestonpeakpowerpostexercisebloodlactateandheartraterecoveryinmalescrossoverstudy
AT smolarekmarcin influenceofintensityrampincrementaltestonpeakpowerpostexercisebloodlactateandheartraterecoveryinmalescrossoverstudy
AT zatonmarek influenceofintensityrampincrementaltestonpeakpowerpostexercisebloodlactateandheartraterecoveryinmalescrossoverstudy