Cargando…

Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio (mLNR) is a Useful Parameter in the Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer; A Meta-Analysis for the Prognostic Role of mLNR

Background and objectives: The presenting study aimed to elucidate the prognostic role of the metastatic lymph node ratio (mLNR) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), using a meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: Using data from 90,274 patients from 14 eligible studies, we performed a meta-analy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pyo, Jung Soo, Kim, Joo Heon, Lee, Seung Yun, Baek, Tae Hwa, Kang, Dong Wook
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6843621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31590275
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55100673
_version_ 1783468259006218240
author Pyo, Jung Soo
Kim, Joo Heon
Lee, Seung Yun
Baek, Tae Hwa
Kang, Dong Wook
author_facet Pyo, Jung Soo
Kim, Joo Heon
Lee, Seung Yun
Baek, Tae Hwa
Kang, Dong Wook
author_sort Pyo, Jung Soo
collection PubMed
description Background and objectives: The presenting study aimed to elucidate the prognostic role of the metastatic lymph node ratio (mLNR) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), using a meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: Using data from 90,274 patients from 14 eligible studies, we performed a meta-analysis for the correlation between mLNR and survival rate. Besides, subgroup analyses were performed, based on tumor stage, tumor location, and mLNR. Results: A high mLNR showed significant correlation with worse overall survival and disease-free survival rates in CRC patients (hazard ratio (HR), 1.617, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.393–1.877, and HR 2.345, 95% CI 1.879–2.926, respectively). In patients with stage III, who had regional LN metastasis, the HRs were 1.730 (95% CI 1.266–2.362) and 2.451 (95% CI 1.719–3.494) for overall and disease-free survival, respectively. According to tumor location, rectal cancer showed a worse survival rate when compared to colon cancer. In the analysis for overall survival, when mLNR was 0.2, HR was the highest across the different subgroups (HR 5.040, 95% CI 1.780–14.270). However, in the analysis for disease-free survival, the subgroup with an mLNR < 0.2 had a higher HR than the other subgroups (HR 2.878, 95% CI 1.401–5.912). Conclusions: The mLNR may be a useful prognostic factor for patients with CRC, regardless of the tumor stage or tumor location. Further studies are necessary for the detailed criteria of mLNR before its application in daily practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6843621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68436212019-11-25 Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio (mLNR) is a Useful Parameter in the Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer; A Meta-Analysis for the Prognostic Role of mLNR Pyo, Jung Soo Kim, Joo Heon Lee, Seung Yun Baek, Tae Hwa Kang, Dong Wook Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and objectives: The presenting study aimed to elucidate the prognostic role of the metastatic lymph node ratio (mLNR) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), using a meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: Using data from 90,274 patients from 14 eligible studies, we performed a meta-analysis for the correlation between mLNR and survival rate. Besides, subgroup analyses were performed, based on tumor stage, tumor location, and mLNR. Results: A high mLNR showed significant correlation with worse overall survival and disease-free survival rates in CRC patients (hazard ratio (HR), 1.617, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.393–1.877, and HR 2.345, 95% CI 1.879–2.926, respectively). In patients with stage III, who had regional LN metastasis, the HRs were 1.730 (95% CI 1.266–2.362) and 2.451 (95% CI 1.719–3.494) for overall and disease-free survival, respectively. According to tumor location, rectal cancer showed a worse survival rate when compared to colon cancer. In the analysis for overall survival, when mLNR was 0.2, HR was the highest across the different subgroups (HR 5.040, 95% CI 1.780–14.270). However, in the analysis for disease-free survival, the subgroup with an mLNR < 0.2 had a higher HR than the other subgroups (HR 2.878, 95% CI 1.401–5.912). Conclusions: The mLNR may be a useful prognostic factor for patients with CRC, regardless of the tumor stage or tumor location. Further studies are necessary for the detailed criteria of mLNR before its application in daily practice. MDPI 2019-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6843621/ /pubmed/31590275 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55100673 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pyo, Jung Soo
Kim, Joo Heon
Lee, Seung Yun
Baek, Tae Hwa
Kang, Dong Wook
Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio (mLNR) is a Useful Parameter in the Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer; A Meta-Analysis for the Prognostic Role of mLNR
title Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio (mLNR) is a Useful Parameter in the Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer; A Meta-Analysis for the Prognostic Role of mLNR
title_full Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio (mLNR) is a Useful Parameter in the Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer; A Meta-Analysis for the Prognostic Role of mLNR
title_fullStr Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio (mLNR) is a Useful Parameter in the Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer; A Meta-Analysis for the Prognostic Role of mLNR
title_full_unstemmed Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio (mLNR) is a Useful Parameter in the Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer; A Meta-Analysis for the Prognostic Role of mLNR
title_short Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio (mLNR) is a Useful Parameter in the Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer; A Meta-Analysis for the Prognostic Role of mLNR
title_sort metastatic lymph node ratio (mlnr) is a useful parameter in the prognosis of colorectal cancer; a meta-analysis for the prognostic role of mlnr
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6843621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31590275
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55100673
work_keys_str_mv AT pyojungsoo metastaticlymphnoderatiomlnrisausefulparameterintheprognosisofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisfortheprognosticroleofmlnr
AT kimjooheon metastaticlymphnoderatiomlnrisausefulparameterintheprognosisofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisfortheprognosticroleofmlnr
AT leeseungyun metastaticlymphnoderatiomlnrisausefulparameterintheprognosisofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisfortheprognosticroleofmlnr
AT baektaehwa metastaticlymphnoderatiomlnrisausefulparameterintheprognosisofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisfortheprognosticroleofmlnr
AT kangdongwook metastaticlymphnoderatiomlnrisausefulparameterintheprognosisofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisfortheprognosticroleofmlnr