Cargando…
Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio (mLNR) is a Useful Parameter in the Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer; A Meta-Analysis for the Prognostic Role of mLNR
Background and objectives: The presenting study aimed to elucidate the prognostic role of the metastatic lymph node ratio (mLNR) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), using a meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: Using data from 90,274 patients from 14 eligible studies, we performed a meta-analy...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6843621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31590275 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55100673 |
_version_ | 1783468259006218240 |
---|---|
author | Pyo, Jung Soo Kim, Joo Heon Lee, Seung Yun Baek, Tae Hwa Kang, Dong Wook |
author_facet | Pyo, Jung Soo Kim, Joo Heon Lee, Seung Yun Baek, Tae Hwa Kang, Dong Wook |
author_sort | Pyo, Jung Soo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and objectives: The presenting study aimed to elucidate the prognostic role of the metastatic lymph node ratio (mLNR) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), using a meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: Using data from 90,274 patients from 14 eligible studies, we performed a meta-analysis for the correlation between mLNR and survival rate. Besides, subgroup analyses were performed, based on tumor stage, tumor location, and mLNR. Results: A high mLNR showed significant correlation with worse overall survival and disease-free survival rates in CRC patients (hazard ratio (HR), 1.617, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.393–1.877, and HR 2.345, 95% CI 1.879–2.926, respectively). In patients with stage III, who had regional LN metastasis, the HRs were 1.730 (95% CI 1.266–2.362) and 2.451 (95% CI 1.719–3.494) for overall and disease-free survival, respectively. According to tumor location, rectal cancer showed a worse survival rate when compared to colon cancer. In the analysis for overall survival, when mLNR was 0.2, HR was the highest across the different subgroups (HR 5.040, 95% CI 1.780–14.270). However, in the analysis for disease-free survival, the subgroup with an mLNR < 0.2 had a higher HR than the other subgroups (HR 2.878, 95% CI 1.401–5.912). Conclusions: The mLNR may be a useful prognostic factor for patients with CRC, regardless of the tumor stage or tumor location. Further studies are necessary for the detailed criteria of mLNR before its application in daily practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6843621 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68436212019-11-25 Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio (mLNR) is a Useful Parameter in the Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer; A Meta-Analysis for the Prognostic Role of mLNR Pyo, Jung Soo Kim, Joo Heon Lee, Seung Yun Baek, Tae Hwa Kang, Dong Wook Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and objectives: The presenting study aimed to elucidate the prognostic role of the metastatic lymph node ratio (mLNR) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), using a meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: Using data from 90,274 patients from 14 eligible studies, we performed a meta-analysis for the correlation between mLNR and survival rate. Besides, subgroup analyses were performed, based on tumor stage, tumor location, and mLNR. Results: A high mLNR showed significant correlation with worse overall survival and disease-free survival rates in CRC patients (hazard ratio (HR), 1.617, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.393–1.877, and HR 2.345, 95% CI 1.879–2.926, respectively). In patients with stage III, who had regional LN metastasis, the HRs were 1.730 (95% CI 1.266–2.362) and 2.451 (95% CI 1.719–3.494) for overall and disease-free survival, respectively. According to tumor location, rectal cancer showed a worse survival rate when compared to colon cancer. In the analysis for overall survival, when mLNR was 0.2, HR was the highest across the different subgroups (HR 5.040, 95% CI 1.780–14.270). However, in the analysis for disease-free survival, the subgroup with an mLNR < 0.2 had a higher HR than the other subgroups (HR 2.878, 95% CI 1.401–5.912). Conclusions: The mLNR may be a useful prognostic factor for patients with CRC, regardless of the tumor stage or tumor location. Further studies are necessary for the detailed criteria of mLNR before its application in daily practice. MDPI 2019-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6843621/ /pubmed/31590275 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55100673 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pyo, Jung Soo Kim, Joo Heon Lee, Seung Yun Baek, Tae Hwa Kang, Dong Wook Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio (mLNR) is a Useful Parameter in the Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer; A Meta-Analysis for the Prognostic Role of mLNR |
title | Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio (mLNR) is a Useful Parameter in the Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer; A Meta-Analysis for the Prognostic Role of mLNR |
title_full | Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio (mLNR) is a Useful Parameter in the Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer; A Meta-Analysis for the Prognostic Role of mLNR |
title_fullStr | Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio (mLNR) is a Useful Parameter in the Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer; A Meta-Analysis for the Prognostic Role of mLNR |
title_full_unstemmed | Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio (mLNR) is a Useful Parameter in the Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer; A Meta-Analysis for the Prognostic Role of mLNR |
title_short | Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio (mLNR) is a Useful Parameter in the Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer; A Meta-Analysis for the Prognostic Role of mLNR |
title_sort | metastatic lymph node ratio (mlnr) is a useful parameter in the prognosis of colorectal cancer; a meta-analysis for the prognostic role of mlnr |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6843621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31590275 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55100673 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pyojungsoo metastaticlymphnoderatiomlnrisausefulparameterintheprognosisofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisfortheprognosticroleofmlnr AT kimjooheon metastaticlymphnoderatiomlnrisausefulparameterintheprognosisofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisfortheprognosticroleofmlnr AT leeseungyun metastaticlymphnoderatiomlnrisausefulparameterintheprognosisofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisfortheprognosticroleofmlnr AT baektaehwa metastaticlymphnoderatiomlnrisausefulparameterintheprognosisofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisfortheprognosticroleofmlnr AT kangdongwook metastaticlymphnoderatiomlnrisausefulparameterintheprognosisofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisfortheprognosticroleofmlnr |