Cargando…
Predictive Values of Serum Chlamydia trachomatis TroA and HtrA IgG Antibodies as Markers of Persistent Infection in the Detection of Pelvic Adhesions and Tubal Occlusion
Chlamydia trachomatis IgG antibody testing (CAT) has been used as a screening test for tubal factor infertility (TFI), but as the CAT is only a marker of a past exposure to C. trachomatis and not of late sequelae, the positive predictive value (PPV) of the test is low. The persistence of C. trachoma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6843830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31557782 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7100391 |
_version_ | 1783468307912851456 |
---|---|
author | Rantsi, Tiina Land, Jolande A. Joki-Korpela, Päivi Ouburg, Sander Hokynar, Kati Paavonen, Jorma Tiitinen, Aila Puolakkainen, Mirja |
author_facet | Rantsi, Tiina Land, Jolande A. Joki-Korpela, Päivi Ouburg, Sander Hokynar, Kati Paavonen, Jorma Tiitinen, Aila Puolakkainen, Mirja |
author_sort | Rantsi, Tiina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Chlamydia trachomatis IgG antibody testing (CAT) has been used as a screening test for tubal factor infertility (TFI), but as the CAT is only a marker of a past exposure to C. trachomatis and not of late sequelae, the positive predictive value (PPV) of the test is low. The persistence of C. trachomatis in the upper genital tract has been suggested as one of the key mechanisms in the development of TFI. Serum antibodies against C. trachomatis TroA and HtrA, proteins expressed specifically during persistent infection, have been suggested as novel biomarkers for TFI diagnostics. We studied serum IgG antibody responses against C. trachomatis TroA, HtrA and MOMP in 79 subfertile women, of whom 28 had laparoscopically proven TFI. We confirmed that the accuracy of CAT in diagnosing TFI is low, whereas TroA IgG and HtrA IgG are more accurate tests in detecting tubal occlusion and pelvic adhesions. However, the sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of TroA IgG and HtrA IgG are still too low to justify their use as a screening test in clinical practice. Individual immunogenetic profiles combined with TroA and HtrA antibody responses might identify women with the highest risk for developing late complications after C. trachomatis infection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6843830 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68438302019-11-25 Predictive Values of Serum Chlamydia trachomatis TroA and HtrA IgG Antibodies as Markers of Persistent Infection in the Detection of Pelvic Adhesions and Tubal Occlusion Rantsi, Tiina Land, Jolande A. Joki-Korpela, Päivi Ouburg, Sander Hokynar, Kati Paavonen, Jorma Tiitinen, Aila Puolakkainen, Mirja Microorganisms Article Chlamydia trachomatis IgG antibody testing (CAT) has been used as a screening test for tubal factor infertility (TFI), but as the CAT is only a marker of a past exposure to C. trachomatis and not of late sequelae, the positive predictive value (PPV) of the test is low. The persistence of C. trachomatis in the upper genital tract has been suggested as one of the key mechanisms in the development of TFI. Serum antibodies against C. trachomatis TroA and HtrA, proteins expressed specifically during persistent infection, have been suggested as novel biomarkers for TFI diagnostics. We studied serum IgG antibody responses against C. trachomatis TroA, HtrA and MOMP in 79 subfertile women, of whom 28 had laparoscopically proven TFI. We confirmed that the accuracy of CAT in diagnosing TFI is low, whereas TroA IgG and HtrA IgG are more accurate tests in detecting tubal occlusion and pelvic adhesions. However, the sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of TroA IgG and HtrA IgG are still too low to justify their use as a screening test in clinical practice. Individual immunogenetic profiles combined with TroA and HtrA antibody responses might identify women with the highest risk for developing late complications after C. trachomatis infection. MDPI 2019-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6843830/ /pubmed/31557782 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7100391 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Rantsi, Tiina Land, Jolande A. Joki-Korpela, Päivi Ouburg, Sander Hokynar, Kati Paavonen, Jorma Tiitinen, Aila Puolakkainen, Mirja Predictive Values of Serum Chlamydia trachomatis TroA and HtrA IgG Antibodies as Markers of Persistent Infection in the Detection of Pelvic Adhesions and Tubal Occlusion |
title | Predictive Values of Serum Chlamydia trachomatis TroA and HtrA IgG Antibodies as Markers of Persistent Infection in the Detection of Pelvic Adhesions and Tubal Occlusion |
title_full | Predictive Values of Serum Chlamydia trachomatis TroA and HtrA IgG Antibodies as Markers of Persistent Infection in the Detection of Pelvic Adhesions and Tubal Occlusion |
title_fullStr | Predictive Values of Serum Chlamydia trachomatis TroA and HtrA IgG Antibodies as Markers of Persistent Infection in the Detection of Pelvic Adhesions and Tubal Occlusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictive Values of Serum Chlamydia trachomatis TroA and HtrA IgG Antibodies as Markers of Persistent Infection in the Detection of Pelvic Adhesions and Tubal Occlusion |
title_short | Predictive Values of Serum Chlamydia trachomatis TroA and HtrA IgG Antibodies as Markers of Persistent Infection in the Detection of Pelvic Adhesions and Tubal Occlusion |
title_sort | predictive values of serum chlamydia trachomatis troa and htra igg antibodies as markers of persistent infection in the detection of pelvic adhesions and tubal occlusion |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6843830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31557782 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7100391 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rantsitiina predictivevaluesofserumchlamydiatrachomatistroaandhtraiggantibodiesasmarkersofpersistentinfectioninthedetectionofpelvicadhesionsandtubalocclusion AT landjolandea predictivevaluesofserumchlamydiatrachomatistroaandhtraiggantibodiesasmarkersofpersistentinfectioninthedetectionofpelvicadhesionsandtubalocclusion AT jokikorpelapaivi predictivevaluesofserumchlamydiatrachomatistroaandhtraiggantibodiesasmarkersofpersistentinfectioninthedetectionofpelvicadhesionsandtubalocclusion AT ouburgsander predictivevaluesofserumchlamydiatrachomatistroaandhtraiggantibodiesasmarkersofpersistentinfectioninthedetectionofpelvicadhesionsandtubalocclusion AT hokynarkati predictivevaluesofserumchlamydiatrachomatistroaandhtraiggantibodiesasmarkersofpersistentinfectioninthedetectionofpelvicadhesionsandtubalocclusion AT paavonenjorma predictivevaluesofserumchlamydiatrachomatistroaandhtraiggantibodiesasmarkersofpersistentinfectioninthedetectionofpelvicadhesionsandtubalocclusion AT tiitinenaila predictivevaluesofserumchlamydiatrachomatistroaandhtraiggantibodiesasmarkersofpersistentinfectioninthedetectionofpelvicadhesionsandtubalocclusion AT puolakkainenmirja predictivevaluesofserumchlamydiatrachomatistroaandhtraiggantibodiesasmarkersofpersistentinfectioninthedetectionofpelvicadhesionsandtubalocclusion |