Cargando…

Working with Institutional Stakeholders: Propositions for Alternative Approaches to Community Engagement

Community engagement is a vital aspect of addressing environmental contamination and remediation. In the United States, the Superfund Research Program (SRP) forms groups of academic researchers from the social and physical sciences into Community Engagement Cores (CECs) and Research Translation Core...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cox, Jeffrey G., Chung, Minwoong, Hamm, Joseph A., Zwickle, Adam, Cruz, Shannon M., Dearing, James W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6844076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31635112
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16204010
_version_ 1783468363983355904
author Cox, Jeffrey G.
Chung, Minwoong
Hamm, Joseph A.
Zwickle, Adam
Cruz, Shannon M.
Dearing, James W.
author_facet Cox, Jeffrey G.
Chung, Minwoong
Hamm, Joseph A.
Zwickle, Adam
Cruz, Shannon M.
Dearing, James W.
author_sort Cox, Jeffrey G.
collection PubMed
description Community engagement is a vital aspect of addressing environmental contamination and remediation. In the United States, the Superfund Research Program (SRP) forms groups of academic researchers from the social and physical sciences into Community Engagement Cores (CECs) and Research Translation Cores (RTCs), which focus on various aspects of informing and working with communities during and through the resolution of environmental crises. While this work typically involves engaging directly with members of affected communities, no two situations are the same. In some cases, alternative approaches to community engagement can be more appropriate for community improvement than traditional approaches. In particular, when research teams become involved in contamination crises at a late point in the process, their contributions can be better directed at supporting and reinforcing the work of institutional stakeholders charged with remediating pollution. Relevant factors include issue fatigue among a local population, and contamination that is due to a major employer. Supported by literature and experience, we offer several propositions that we believe lay out conditions that warrant such an approach by academic teams, rather than their direct engagement with unaffiliated individuals in communities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6844076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68440762019-11-18 Working with Institutional Stakeholders: Propositions for Alternative Approaches to Community Engagement Cox, Jeffrey G. Chung, Minwoong Hamm, Joseph A. Zwickle, Adam Cruz, Shannon M. Dearing, James W. Int J Environ Res Public Health Communication Community engagement is a vital aspect of addressing environmental contamination and remediation. In the United States, the Superfund Research Program (SRP) forms groups of academic researchers from the social and physical sciences into Community Engagement Cores (CECs) and Research Translation Cores (RTCs), which focus on various aspects of informing and working with communities during and through the resolution of environmental crises. While this work typically involves engaging directly with members of affected communities, no two situations are the same. In some cases, alternative approaches to community engagement can be more appropriate for community improvement than traditional approaches. In particular, when research teams become involved in contamination crises at a late point in the process, their contributions can be better directed at supporting and reinforcing the work of institutional stakeholders charged with remediating pollution. Relevant factors include issue fatigue among a local population, and contamination that is due to a major employer. Supported by literature and experience, we offer several propositions that we believe lay out conditions that warrant such an approach by academic teams, rather than their direct engagement with unaffiliated individuals in communities. MDPI 2019-10-19 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6844076/ /pubmed/31635112 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16204010 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Cox, Jeffrey G.
Chung, Minwoong
Hamm, Joseph A.
Zwickle, Adam
Cruz, Shannon M.
Dearing, James W.
Working with Institutional Stakeholders: Propositions for Alternative Approaches to Community Engagement
title Working with Institutional Stakeholders: Propositions for Alternative Approaches to Community Engagement
title_full Working with Institutional Stakeholders: Propositions for Alternative Approaches to Community Engagement
title_fullStr Working with Institutional Stakeholders: Propositions for Alternative Approaches to Community Engagement
title_full_unstemmed Working with Institutional Stakeholders: Propositions for Alternative Approaches to Community Engagement
title_short Working with Institutional Stakeholders: Propositions for Alternative Approaches to Community Engagement
title_sort working with institutional stakeholders: propositions for alternative approaches to community engagement
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6844076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31635112
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16204010
work_keys_str_mv AT coxjeffreyg workingwithinstitutionalstakeholderspropositionsforalternativeapproachestocommunityengagement
AT chungminwoong workingwithinstitutionalstakeholderspropositionsforalternativeapproachestocommunityengagement
AT hammjosepha workingwithinstitutionalstakeholderspropositionsforalternativeapproachestocommunityengagement
AT zwickleadam workingwithinstitutionalstakeholderspropositionsforalternativeapproachestocommunityengagement
AT cruzshannonm workingwithinstitutionalstakeholderspropositionsforalternativeapproachestocommunityengagement
AT dearingjamesw workingwithinstitutionalstakeholderspropositionsforalternativeapproachestocommunityengagement