Cargando…
Working with Institutional Stakeholders: Propositions for Alternative Approaches to Community Engagement
Community engagement is a vital aspect of addressing environmental contamination and remediation. In the United States, the Superfund Research Program (SRP) forms groups of academic researchers from the social and physical sciences into Community Engagement Cores (CECs) and Research Translation Core...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6844076/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31635112 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16204010 |
_version_ | 1783468363983355904 |
---|---|
author | Cox, Jeffrey G. Chung, Minwoong Hamm, Joseph A. Zwickle, Adam Cruz, Shannon M. Dearing, James W. |
author_facet | Cox, Jeffrey G. Chung, Minwoong Hamm, Joseph A. Zwickle, Adam Cruz, Shannon M. Dearing, James W. |
author_sort | Cox, Jeffrey G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Community engagement is a vital aspect of addressing environmental contamination and remediation. In the United States, the Superfund Research Program (SRP) forms groups of academic researchers from the social and physical sciences into Community Engagement Cores (CECs) and Research Translation Cores (RTCs), which focus on various aspects of informing and working with communities during and through the resolution of environmental crises. While this work typically involves engaging directly with members of affected communities, no two situations are the same. In some cases, alternative approaches to community engagement can be more appropriate for community improvement than traditional approaches. In particular, when research teams become involved in contamination crises at a late point in the process, their contributions can be better directed at supporting and reinforcing the work of institutional stakeholders charged with remediating pollution. Relevant factors include issue fatigue among a local population, and contamination that is due to a major employer. Supported by literature and experience, we offer several propositions that we believe lay out conditions that warrant such an approach by academic teams, rather than their direct engagement with unaffiliated individuals in communities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6844076 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68440762019-11-18 Working with Institutional Stakeholders: Propositions for Alternative Approaches to Community Engagement Cox, Jeffrey G. Chung, Minwoong Hamm, Joseph A. Zwickle, Adam Cruz, Shannon M. Dearing, James W. Int J Environ Res Public Health Communication Community engagement is a vital aspect of addressing environmental contamination and remediation. In the United States, the Superfund Research Program (SRP) forms groups of academic researchers from the social and physical sciences into Community Engagement Cores (CECs) and Research Translation Cores (RTCs), which focus on various aspects of informing and working with communities during and through the resolution of environmental crises. While this work typically involves engaging directly with members of affected communities, no two situations are the same. In some cases, alternative approaches to community engagement can be more appropriate for community improvement than traditional approaches. In particular, when research teams become involved in contamination crises at a late point in the process, their contributions can be better directed at supporting and reinforcing the work of institutional stakeholders charged with remediating pollution. Relevant factors include issue fatigue among a local population, and contamination that is due to a major employer. Supported by literature and experience, we offer several propositions that we believe lay out conditions that warrant such an approach by academic teams, rather than their direct engagement with unaffiliated individuals in communities. MDPI 2019-10-19 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6844076/ /pubmed/31635112 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16204010 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Communication Cox, Jeffrey G. Chung, Minwoong Hamm, Joseph A. Zwickle, Adam Cruz, Shannon M. Dearing, James W. Working with Institutional Stakeholders: Propositions for Alternative Approaches to Community Engagement |
title | Working with Institutional Stakeholders: Propositions for Alternative Approaches to Community Engagement |
title_full | Working with Institutional Stakeholders: Propositions for Alternative Approaches to Community Engagement |
title_fullStr | Working with Institutional Stakeholders: Propositions for Alternative Approaches to Community Engagement |
title_full_unstemmed | Working with Institutional Stakeholders: Propositions for Alternative Approaches to Community Engagement |
title_short | Working with Institutional Stakeholders: Propositions for Alternative Approaches to Community Engagement |
title_sort | working with institutional stakeholders: propositions for alternative approaches to community engagement |
topic | Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6844076/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31635112 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16204010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coxjeffreyg workingwithinstitutionalstakeholderspropositionsforalternativeapproachestocommunityengagement AT chungminwoong workingwithinstitutionalstakeholderspropositionsforalternativeapproachestocommunityengagement AT hammjosepha workingwithinstitutionalstakeholderspropositionsforalternativeapproachestocommunityengagement AT zwickleadam workingwithinstitutionalstakeholderspropositionsforalternativeapproachestocommunityengagement AT cruzshannonm workingwithinstitutionalstakeholderspropositionsforalternativeapproachestocommunityengagement AT dearingjamesw workingwithinstitutionalstakeholderspropositionsforalternativeapproachestocommunityengagement |