Cargando…
Artificial colloids versus human albumin for the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A retrospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: The optimal colloid solution for the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) remains to be established. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare artificial colloids (AC) with human albumin (HA) for the treatment of OHSS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, data...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Knowledge E
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6844285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31807719 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v17i10.5287 |
_version_ | 1783468404666007552 |
---|---|
author | Minami, Tetsuji MPH, Yamana, Hayato Ph.D., MPH Shigemi, Daisuke MPH, Matsui1 MPH, Hiroki Fushimi, Kiyohide Ph.D., Yasunaga, Hideo Ph.D., |
author_facet | Minami, Tetsuji MPH, Yamana, Hayato Ph.D., MPH Shigemi, Daisuke MPH, Matsui1 MPH, Hiroki Fushimi, Kiyohide Ph.D., Yasunaga, Hideo Ph.D., |
author_sort | Minami, Tetsuji |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The optimal colloid solution for the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) remains to be established. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare artificial colloids (AC) with human albumin (HA) for the treatment of OHSS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, data for OHSS participants were collected from a national inpatient database in Japan. The participants received intravenous fluid management with AC (n = 156) or HA (n = 127). We compared the two groups in terms of the length of stay, development of post-treatment complications, and termination surgery. RESULTS: In multivariable linear regression analyses for log-transformed length of stay with reference to the OHSS participants receiving AC, the regression coefficient (95% confidence interval) in participants receiving HA was 0.03 (-0.04-0.09, p = 0.42). Thromboembolism occurred in two participants in the HA group and three participants in the AC group. Two participants in the HA group suffered renal failure during hospitalization. No participants underwent termination surgery in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The present results showed comparable efficacy between AC and HA for the treatment of OHSS. There were no significant differences in post-treatment complications between the two groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6844285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Knowledge E |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68442852019-12-05 Artificial colloids versus human albumin for the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A retrospective cohort study Minami, Tetsuji MPH, Yamana, Hayato Ph.D., MPH Shigemi, Daisuke MPH, Matsui1 MPH, Hiroki Fushimi, Kiyohide Ph.D., Yasunaga, Hideo Ph.D., Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd) Research Article BACKGROUND: The optimal colloid solution for the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) remains to be established. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare artificial colloids (AC) with human albumin (HA) for the treatment of OHSS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, data for OHSS participants were collected from a national inpatient database in Japan. The participants received intravenous fluid management with AC (n = 156) or HA (n = 127). We compared the two groups in terms of the length of stay, development of post-treatment complications, and termination surgery. RESULTS: In multivariable linear regression analyses for log-transformed length of stay with reference to the OHSS participants receiving AC, the regression coefficient (95% confidence interval) in participants receiving HA was 0.03 (-0.04-0.09, p = 0.42). Thromboembolism occurred in two participants in the HA group and three participants in the AC group. Two participants in the HA group suffered renal failure during hospitalization. No participants underwent termination surgery in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The present results showed comparable efficacy between AC and HA for the treatment of OHSS. There were no significant differences in post-treatment complications between the two groups. Knowledge E 2019-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6844285/ /pubmed/31807719 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v17i10.5287 Text en Copyright © 2019 Tetsuji Minami et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Minami, Tetsuji MPH, Yamana, Hayato Ph.D., MPH Shigemi, Daisuke MPH, Matsui1 MPH, Hiroki Fushimi, Kiyohide Ph.D., Yasunaga, Hideo Ph.D., Artificial colloids versus human albumin for the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A retrospective cohort study |
title | Artificial colloids versus human albumin for the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Artificial colloids versus human albumin for the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Artificial colloids versus human albumin for the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial colloids versus human albumin for the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Artificial colloids versus human albumin for the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | artificial colloids versus human albumin for the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6844285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31807719 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v17i10.5287 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT minamitetsuji artificialcolloidsversushumanalbuminforthetreatmentofovarianhyperstimulationsyndromearetrospectivecohortstudy AT mph artificialcolloidsversushumanalbuminforthetreatmentofovarianhyperstimulationsyndromearetrospectivecohortstudy AT yamanahayato artificialcolloidsversushumanalbuminforthetreatmentofovarianhyperstimulationsyndromearetrospectivecohortstudy AT phdmph artificialcolloidsversushumanalbuminforthetreatmentofovarianhyperstimulationsyndromearetrospectivecohortstudy AT shigemidaisuke artificialcolloidsversushumanalbuminforthetreatmentofovarianhyperstimulationsyndromearetrospectivecohortstudy AT mph artificialcolloidsversushumanalbuminforthetreatmentofovarianhyperstimulationsyndromearetrospectivecohortstudy AT matsui1mphhiroki artificialcolloidsversushumanalbuminforthetreatmentofovarianhyperstimulationsyndromearetrospectivecohortstudy AT fushimikiyohide artificialcolloidsversushumanalbuminforthetreatmentofovarianhyperstimulationsyndromearetrospectivecohortstudy AT phd artificialcolloidsversushumanalbuminforthetreatmentofovarianhyperstimulationsyndromearetrospectivecohortstudy AT yasunagahideo artificialcolloidsversushumanalbuminforthetreatmentofovarianhyperstimulationsyndromearetrospectivecohortstudy AT phd artificialcolloidsversushumanalbuminforthetreatmentofovarianhyperstimulationsyndromearetrospectivecohortstudy |