Cargando…

Artificial colloids versus human albumin for the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: The optimal colloid solution for the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) remains to be established. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare artificial colloids (AC) with human albumin (HA) for the treatment of OHSS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minami, Tetsuji, MPH, Yamana, Hayato, Ph.D., MPH, Shigemi, Daisuke, Matsui1 MPH, Hiroki, Fushimi, Kiyohide, Ph.D., Yasunaga, Hideo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Knowledge E 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6844285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31807719
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v17i10.5287
_version_ 1783468404666007552
author Minami, Tetsuji
MPH,
Yamana, Hayato
Ph.D., MPH
Shigemi, Daisuke
MPH,
Matsui1 MPH, Hiroki
Fushimi, Kiyohide
Ph.D.,
Yasunaga, Hideo
Ph.D.,
author_facet Minami, Tetsuji
MPH,
Yamana, Hayato
Ph.D., MPH
Shigemi, Daisuke
MPH,
Matsui1 MPH, Hiroki
Fushimi, Kiyohide
Ph.D.,
Yasunaga, Hideo
Ph.D.,
author_sort Minami, Tetsuji
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal colloid solution for the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) remains to be established. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare artificial colloids (AC) with human albumin (HA) for the treatment of OHSS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, data for OHSS participants were collected from a national inpatient database in Japan. The participants received intravenous fluid management with AC (n = 156) or HA (n = 127). We compared the two groups in terms of the length of stay, development of post-treatment complications, and termination surgery. RESULTS: In multivariable linear regression analyses for log-transformed length of stay with reference to the OHSS participants receiving AC, the regression coefficient (95% confidence interval) in participants receiving HA was 0.03 (-0.04-0.09, p = 0.42). Thromboembolism occurred in two participants in the HA group and three participants in the AC group. Two participants in the HA group suffered renal failure during hospitalization. No participants underwent termination surgery in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The present results showed comparable efficacy between AC and HA for the treatment of OHSS. There were no significant differences in post-treatment complications between the two groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6844285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Knowledge E
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68442852019-12-05 Artificial colloids versus human albumin for the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A retrospective cohort study Minami, Tetsuji MPH, Yamana, Hayato Ph.D., MPH Shigemi, Daisuke MPH, Matsui1 MPH, Hiroki Fushimi, Kiyohide Ph.D., Yasunaga, Hideo Ph.D., Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd) Research Article BACKGROUND: The optimal colloid solution for the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) remains to be established. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare artificial colloids (AC) with human albumin (HA) for the treatment of OHSS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, data for OHSS participants were collected from a national inpatient database in Japan. The participants received intravenous fluid management with AC (n = 156) or HA (n = 127). We compared the two groups in terms of the length of stay, development of post-treatment complications, and termination surgery. RESULTS: In multivariable linear regression analyses for log-transformed length of stay with reference to the OHSS participants receiving AC, the regression coefficient (95% confidence interval) in participants receiving HA was 0.03 (-0.04-0.09, p = 0.42). Thromboembolism occurred in two participants in the HA group and three participants in the AC group. Two participants in the HA group suffered renal failure during hospitalization. No participants underwent termination surgery in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The present results showed comparable efficacy between AC and HA for the treatment of OHSS. There were no significant differences in post-treatment complications between the two groups. Knowledge E 2019-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6844285/ /pubmed/31807719 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v17i10.5287 Text en Copyright © 2019 Tetsuji Minami et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Minami, Tetsuji
MPH,
Yamana, Hayato
Ph.D., MPH
Shigemi, Daisuke
MPH,
Matsui1 MPH, Hiroki
Fushimi, Kiyohide
Ph.D.,
Yasunaga, Hideo
Ph.D.,
Artificial colloids versus human albumin for the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A retrospective cohort study
title Artificial colloids versus human albumin for the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A retrospective cohort study
title_full Artificial colloids versus human albumin for the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Artificial colloids versus human albumin for the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Artificial colloids versus human albumin for the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A retrospective cohort study
title_short Artificial colloids versus human albumin for the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A retrospective cohort study
title_sort artificial colloids versus human albumin for the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6844285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31807719
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v17i10.5287
work_keys_str_mv AT minamitetsuji artificialcolloidsversushumanalbuminforthetreatmentofovarianhyperstimulationsyndromearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT mph artificialcolloidsversushumanalbuminforthetreatmentofovarianhyperstimulationsyndromearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT yamanahayato artificialcolloidsversushumanalbuminforthetreatmentofovarianhyperstimulationsyndromearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT phdmph artificialcolloidsversushumanalbuminforthetreatmentofovarianhyperstimulationsyndromearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT shigemidaisuke artificialcolloidsversushumanalbuminforthetreatmentofovarianhyperstimulationsyndromearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT mph artificialcolloidsversushumanalbuminforthetreatmentofovarianhyperstimulationsyndromearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT matsui1mphhiroki artificialcolloidsversushumanalbuminforthetreatmentofovarianhyperstimulationsyndromearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT fushimikiyohide artificialcolloidsversushumanalbuminforthetreatmentofovarianhyperstimulationsyndromearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT phd artificialcolloidsversushumanalbuminforthetreatmentofovarianhyperstimulationsyndromearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT yasunagahideo artificialcolloidsversushumanalbuminforthetreatmentofovarianhyperstimulationsyndromearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT phd artificialcolloidsversushumanalbuminforthetreatmentofovarianhyperstimulationsyndromearetrospectivecohortstudy