Cargando…

THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF NIH PEER REVIEW: THE CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC REVIEW

The National Institutes of Health is the largest public funder of biomedical and bio-behavioral research in the United States. The mission is to enhance health, lengthen life, and reduce illness and disability. To achieve this mission, the NIH provides support for cutting-edge research and technolog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Femia, Elia, Plude, Dana, Rebok, George W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6844800/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.763
_version_ 1783468514169847808
author Femia, Elia
Plude, Dana
Rebok, George W
author_facet Femia, Elia
Plude, Dana
Rebok, George W
author_sort Femia, Elia
collection PubMed
description The National Institutes of Health is the largest public funder of biomedical and bio-behavioral research in the United States. The mission is to enhance health, lengthen life, and reduce illness and disability. To achieve this mission, the NIH provides support for cutting-edge research and technology development in a variety of fields, ranging from translation of innovative ideas in technology to basic science on major health challenges and disease. There are many types of research and training opportunities and technology development programs that are supported by the NIH across the 24 institutes and centers that provide funding. The majority of grant applications are reviewed by the NIH Center for Scientific Review (CSR). In this symposium, attendees will get 1) an overview of the types of applications submitted to the NIH for support; 2) the basics of the NIH peer review process and criteria and scoring system for evaluating applications, and 3) tips for writing a more successful grant application. Peer review is the cornerstone of the NIH grants process, and an insider’s view can lead to a better understanding of how the most meritorious projects are identified that lead to innovative re-search in the biomedical and bio-behavioral sciences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6844800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68448002019-11-18 THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF NIH PEER REVIEW: THE CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC REVIEW Femia, Elia Plude, Dana Rebok, George W Innov Aging Session 1125 (Symposium) The National Institutes of Health is the largest public funder of biomedical and bio-behavioral research in the United States. The mission is to enhance health, lengthen life, and reduce illness and disability. To achieve this mission, the NIH provides support for cutting-edge research and technology development in a variety of fields, ranging from translation of innovative ideas in technology to basic science on major health challenges and disease. There are many types of research and training opportunities and technology development programs that are supported by the NIH across the 24 institutes and centers that provide funding. The majority of grant applications are reviewed by the NIH Center for Scientific Review (CSR). In this symposium, attendees will get 1) an overview of the types of applications submitted to the NIH for support; 2) the basics of the NIH peer review process and criteria and scoring system for evaluating applications, and 3) tips for writing a more successful grant application. Peer review is the cornerstone of the NIH grants process, and an insider’s view can lead to a better understanding of how the most meritorious projects are identified that lead to innovative re-search in the biomedical and bio-behavioral sciences. Oxford University Press 2019-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6844800/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.763 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Session 1125 (Symposium)
Femia, Elia
Plude, Dana
Rebok, George W
THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF NIH PEER REVIEW: THE CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC REVIEW
title THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF NIH PEER REVIEW: THE CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC REVIEW
title_full THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF NIH PEER REVIEW: THE CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC REVIEW
title_fullStr THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF NIH PEER REVIEW: THE CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC REVIEW
title_full_unstemmed THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF NIH PEER REVIEW: THE CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC REVIEW
title_short THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF NIH PEER REVIEW: THE CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC REVIEW
title_sort nuts and bolts of nih peer review: the center for scientific review
topic Session 1125 (Symposium)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6844800/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.763
work_keys_str_mv AT femiaelia thenutsandboltsofnihpeerreviewthecenterforscientificreview
AT pludedana thenutsandboltsofnihpeerreviewthecenterforscientificreview
AT rebokgeorgew thenutsandboltsofnihpeerreviewthecenterforscientificreview
AT femiaelia nutsandboltsofnihpeerreviewthecenterforscientificreview
AT pludedana nutsandboltsofnihpeerreviewthecenterforscientificreview
AT rebokgeorgew nutsandboltsofnihpeerreviewthecenterforscientificreview