Cargando…
DEFINITIONS MATTER WHEN DIAGNOSING MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT
Prior studies have shown that when standard diagnostic criteria are applied, the majority of individuals diagnosed with aMCI do not progress to clinical dementia, with a much larger proportion reverting to normal cognition. This suggests that a prospective confirmation of aMCI diagnosis may improve...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6844986/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.424 |
_version_ | 1783468558290780160 |
---|---|
author | Derby, Carol Hall, Charles B Katz, Mindy |
author_facet | Derby, Carol Hall, Charles B Katz, Mindy |
author_sort | Derby, Carol |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prior studies have shown that when standard diagnostic criteria are applied, the majority of individuals diagnosed with aMCI do not progress to clinical dementia, with a much larger proportion reverting to normal cognition. This suggests that a prospective confirmation of aMCI diagnosis may improve the specificity of the classification. We examined the rates of aMCI reversion using two definitions: one based on a single annual assessment, and one requiring a diagnosis over two consecutive annual assessments within the population based Einstein Aging Study Cohort. Using the definition that used a single annual assessment resulted in 224 incident aMCI cases in 5,321 person years of follow-up, for an incidence rate of 4.21 cases per 100 person years. Requiring the confirmatory diagnosis resulted in only 94 incident aMCI cases in 5736 person years of follow-up, for an incidence rate of 1.64 cases per 100 person years. 41% of the persons diagnosed with aMCI using the single annual assessment were cognitively normal at the next follow-up. Only 14% of the persons diagnosed with incident aMCI using the definition requiring later confirmation ever returned to being cognitively normal. When the aMCI definition that required confirmation was used, a dramatic reduction in the incidence rate of aMCI was observed in persons born after 1930, similar to what has been reported in the same cohort for dementia, but there was no such difference for the definition based on a single annual assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6844986 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68449862019-11-18 DEFINITIONS MATTER WHEN DIAGNOSING MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT Derby, Carol Hall, Charles B Katz, Mindy Innov Aging Session 845 (Poster) Prior studies have shown that when standard diagnostic criteria are applied, the majority of individuals diagnosed with aMCI do not progress to clinical dementia, with a much larger proportion reverting to normal cognition. This suggests that a prospective confirmation of aMCI diagnosis may improve the specificity of the classification. We examined the rates of aMCI reversion using two definitions: one based on a single annual assessment, and one requiring a diagnosis over two consecutive annual assessments within the population based Einstein Aging Study Cohort. Using the definition that used a single annual assessment resulted in 224 incident aMCI cases in 5,321 person years of follow-up, for an incidence rate of 4.21 cases per 100 person years. Requiring the confirmatory diagnosis resulted in only 94 incident aMCI cases in 5736 person years of follow-up, for an incidence rate of 1.64 cases per 100 person years. 41% of the persons diagnosed with aMCI using the single annual assessment were cognitively normal at the next follow-up. Only 14% of the persons diagnosed with incident aMCI using the definition requiring later confirmation ever returned to being cognitively normal. When the aMCI definition that required confirmation was used, a dramatic reduction in the incidence rate of aMCI was observed in persons born after 1930, similar to what has been reported in the same cohort for dementia, but there was no such difference for the definition based on a single annual assessment. Oxford University Press 2019-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6844986/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.424 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Session 845 (Poster) Derby, Carol Hall, Charles B Katz, Mindy DEFINITIONS MATTER WHEN DIAGNOSING MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT |
title | DEFINITIONS MATTER WHEN DIAGNOSING MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT |
title_full | DEFINITIONS MATTER WHEN DIAGNOSING MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT |
title_fullStr | DEFINITIONS MATTER WHEN DIAGNOSING MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT |
title_full_unstemmed | DEFINITIONS MATTER WHEN DIAGNOSING MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT |
title_short | DEFINITIONS MATTER WHEN DIAGNOSING MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT |
title_sort | definitions matter when diagnosing mild cognitive impairment |
topic | Session 845 (Poster) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6844986/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.424 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT derbycarol definitionsmatterwhendiagnosingmildcognitiveimpairment AT hallcharlesb definitionsmatterwhendiagnosingmildcognitiveimpairment AT katzmindy definitionsmatterwhendiagnosingmildcognitiveimpairment |