Cargando…

DEFINITIONS MATTER WHEN DIAGNOSING MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT

Prior studies have shown that when standard diagnostic criteria are applied, the majority of individuals diagnosed with aMCI do not progress to clinical dementia, with a much larger proportion reverting to normal cognition. This suggests that a prospective confirmation of aMCI diagnosis may improve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Derby, Carol, Hall, Charles B, Katz, Mindy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6844986/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.424
_version_ 1783468558290780160
author Derby, Carol
Hall, Charles B
Katz, Mindy
author_facet Derby, Carol
Hall, Charles B
Katz, Mindy
author_sort Derby, Carol
collection PubMed
description Prior studies have shown that when standard diagnostic criteria are applied, the majority of individuals diagnosed with aMCI do not progress to clinical dementia, with a much larger proportion reverting to normal cognition. This suggests that a prospective confirmation of aMCI diagnosis may improve the specificity of the classification. We examined the rates of aMCI reversion using two definitions: one based on a single annual assessment, and one requiring a diagnosis over two consecutive annual assessments within the population based Einstein Aging Study Cohort. Using the definition that used a single annual assessment resulted in 224 incident aMCI cases in 5,321 person years of follow-up, for an incidence rate of 4.21 cases per 100 person years. Requiring the confirmatory diagnosis resulted in only 94 incident aMCI cases in 5736 person years of follow-up, for an incidence rate of 1.64 cases per 100 person years. 41% of the persons diagnosed with aMCI using the single annual assessment were cognitively normal at the next follow-up. Only 14% of the persons diagnosed with incident aMCI using the definition requiring later confirmation ever returned to being cognitively normal. When the aMCI definition that required confirmation was used, a dramatic reduction in the incidence rate of aMCI was observed in persons born after 1930, similar to what has been reported in the same cohort for dementia, but there was no such difference for the definition based on a single annual assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6844986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68449862019-11-18 DEFINITIONS MATTER WHEN DIAGNOSING MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT Derby, Carol Hall, Charles B Katz, Mindy Innov Aging Session 845 (Poster) Prior studies have shown that when standard diagnostic criteria are applied, the majority of individuals diagnosed with aMCI do not progress to clinical dementia, with a much larger proportion reverting to normal cognition. This suggests that a prospective confirmation of aMCI diagnosis may improve the specificity of the classification. We examined the rates of aMCI reversion using two definitions: one based on a single annual assessment, and one requiring a diagnosis over two consecutive annual assessments within the population based Einstein Aging Study Cohort. Using the definition that used a single annual assessment resulted in 224 incident aMCI cases in 5,321 person years of follow-up, for an incidence rate of 4.21 cases per 100 person years. Requiring the confirmatory diagnosis resulted in only 94 incident aMCI cases in 5736 person years of follow-up, for an incidence rate of 1.64 cases per 100 person years. 41% of the persons diagnosed with aMCI using the single annual assessment were cognitively normal at the next follow-up. Only 14% of the persons diagnosed with incident aMCI using the definition requiring later confirmation ever returned to being cognitively normal. When the aMCI definition that required confirmation was used, a dramatic reduction in the incidence rate of aMCI was observed in persons born after 1930, similar to what has been reported in the same cohort for dementia, but there was no such difference for the definition based on a single annual assessment. Oxford University Press 2019-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6844986/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.424 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Session 845 (Poster)
Derby, Carol
Hall, Charles B
Katz, Mindy
DEFINITIONS MATTER WHEN DIAGNOSING MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT
title DEFINITIONS MATTER WHEN DIAGNOSING MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT
title_full DEFINITIONS MATTER WHEN DIAGNOSING MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT
title_fullStr DEFINITIONS MATTER WHEN DIAGNOSING MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT
title_full_unstemmed DEFINITIONS MATTER WHEN DIAGNOSING MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT
title_short DEFINITIONS MATTER WHEN DIAGNOSING MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT
title_sort definitions matter when diagnosing mild cognitive impairment
topic Session 845 (Poster)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6844986/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.424
work_keys_str_mv AT derbycarol definitionsmatterwhendiagnosingmildcognitiveimpairment
AT hallcharlesb definitionsmatterwhendiagnosingmildcognitiveimpairment
AT katzmindy definitionsmatterwhendiagnosingmildcognitiveimpairment