Cargando…

DISPARITIES IN ACCESSING DIFFERENT TYPES OF LONG-TERM CARE SERVICES IN TAIWAN

A growing body of evidence documents pervasive social and demographic factors relating to disparities in long-term care (LTC). In 2007, Taiwan implemented its Ten-year Long-Term Care Plan version 1.0 (TLTCP 1.0) that aimed to develop a home-and community-based (HCBS) LTC system. In 2016, Taiwan bega...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Ya-Mei, Lin, Shih-Chi, Yu, Hsiao-Wei, Wu, Shwu-Chong, Wu, Shih-Cyuan, Wang, Ying-Chieh, Chiang, Tung-Liang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6845014/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.565
_version_ 1783468564948189184
author Chen, Ya-Mei
Lin, Shih-Chi
Yu, Hsiao-Wei
Wu, Shwu-Chong
Wu, Shih-Cyuan
Wang, Ying-Chieh
Chiang, Tung-Liang
author_facet Chen, Ya-Mei
Lin, Shih-Chi
Yu, Hsiao-Wei
Wu, Shwu-Chong
Wu, Shih-Cyuan
Wang, Ying-Chieh
Chiang, Tung-Liang
author_sort Chen, Ya-Mei
collection PubMed
description A growing body of evidence documents pervasive social and demographic factors relating to disparities in long-term care (LTC). In 2007, Taiwan implemented its Ten-year Long-Term Care Plan version 1.0 (TLTCP 1.0) that aimed to develop a home-and community-based (HCBS) LTC system. In 2016, Taiwan began to implement TLTCP 2.0. To continue providing effective LTC, this study aimed to assess the disparities in access to LTC services using Taiwan’s LTC claim database from 2010 to 2013. A total of 87,438 older adults who had applied for LTC services from the TLTCP 1.0 were included. The study assessed LTC disparities related to five sociodemographic factors, including age, gender, living status, urbanization, and income status. Sixteen types of LTC services, including HCBS, home-based professional care, meal services, transportation, and institutional services were assessed. After controlling for the level of disability, we found that those who were older-old (age 80> over), male, and low-income were less likely to use HCBS, but more likely to use institutions services (p < 0.001). We also found that those who lived in the city were more likely to use HCBS and transportation services (p < 0.001). Yet, older adults living alone were more likely to use home care and meal services but not other types of LTC services (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the social disparities in access to LTC services in Taiwan remains, suggesting LTC 2.0 should continue monitoring and placing the LTC equity issue on the top priority.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6845014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68450142019-11-18 DISPARITIES IN ACCESSING DIFFERENT TYPES OF LONG-TERM CARE SERVICES IN TAIWAN Chen, Ya-Mei Lin, Shih-Chi Yu, Hsiao-Wei Wu, Shwu-Chong Wu, Shih-Cyuan Wang, Ying-Chieh Chiang, Tung-Liang Innov Aging Session 910 (Poster) A growing body of evidence documents pervasive social and demographic factors relating to disparities in long-term care (LTC). In 2007, Taiwan implemented its Ten-year Long-Term Care Plan version 1.0 (TLTCP 1.0) that aimed to develop a home-and community-based (HCBS) LTC system. In 2016, Taiwan began to implement TLTCP 2.0. To continue providing effective LTC, this study aimed to assess the disparities in access to LTC services using Taiwan’s LTC claim database from 2010 to 2013. A total of 87,438 older adults who had applied for LTC services from the TLTCP 1.0 were included. The study assessed LTC disparities related to five sociodemographic factors, including age, gender, living status, urbanization, and income status. Sixteen types of LTC services, including HCBS, home-based professional care, meal services, transportation, and institutional services were assessed. After controlling for the level of disability, we found that those who were older-old (age 80> over), male, and low-income were less likely to use HCBS, but more likely to use institutions services (p < 0.001). We also found that those who lived in the city were more likely to use HCBS and transportation services (p < 0.001). Yet, older adults living alone were more likely to use home care and meal services but not other types of LTC services (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the social disparities in access to LTC services in Taiwan remains, suggesting LTC 2.0 should continue monitoring and placing the LTC equity issue on the top priority. Oxford University Press 2019-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6845014/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.565 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Session 910 (Poster)
Chen, Ya-Mei
Lin, Shih-Chi
Yu, Hsiao-Wei
Wu, Shwu-Chong
Wu, Shih-Cyuan
Wang, Ying-Chieh
Chiang, Tung-Liang
DISPARITIES IN ACCESSING DIFFERENT TYPES OF LONG-TERM CARE SERVICES IN TAIWAN
title DISPARITIES IN ACCESSING DIFFERENT TYPES OF LONG-TERM CARE SERVICES IN TAIWAN
title_full DISPARITIES IN ACCESSING DIFFERENT TYPES OF LONG-TERM CARE SERVICES IN TAIWAN
title_fullStr DISPARITIES IN ACCESSING DIFFERENT TYPES OF LONG-TERM CARE SERVICES IN TAIWAN
title_full_unstemmed DISPARITIES IN ACCESSING DIFFERENT TYPES OF LONG-TERM CARE SERVICES IN TAIWAN
title_short DISPARITIES IN ACCESSING DIFFERENT TYPES OF LONG-TERM CARE SERVICES IN TAIWAN
title_sort disparities in accessing different types of long-term care services in taiwan
topic Session 910 (Poster)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6845014/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.565
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyamei disparitiesinaccessingdifferenttypesoflongtermcareservicesintaiwan
AT linshihchi disparitiesinaccessingdifferenttypesoflongtermcareservicesintaiwan
AT yuhsiaowei disparitiesinaccessingdifferenttypesoflongtermcareservicesintaiwan
AT wushwuchong disparitiesinaccessingdifferenttypesoflongtermcareservicesintaiwan
AT wushihcyuan disparitiesinaccessingdifferenttypesoflongtermcareservicesintaiwan
AT wangyingchieh disparitiesinaccessingdifferenttypesoflongtermcareservicesintaiwan
AT chiangtungliang disparitiesinaccessingdifferenttypesoflongtermcareservicesintaiwan