Cargando…
DISPARITIES IN ACCESSING DIFFERENT TYPES OF LONG-TERM CARE SERVICES IN TAIWAN
A growing body of evidence documents pervasive social and demographic factors relating to disparities in long-term care (LTC). In 2007, Taiwan implemented its Ten-year Long-Term Care Plan version 1.0 (TLTCP 1.0) that aimed to develop a home-and community-based (HCBS) LTC system. In 2016, Taiwan bega...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6845014/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.565 |
_version_ | 1783468564948189184 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Ya-Mei Lin, Shih-Chi Yu, Hsiao-Wei Wu, Shwu-Chong Wu, Shih-Cyuan Wang, Ying-Chieh Chiang, Tung-Liang |
author_facet | Chen, Ya-Mei Lin, Shih-Chi Yu, Hsiao-Wei Wu, Shwu-Chong Wu, Shih-Cyuan Wang, Ying-Chieh Chiang, Tung-Liang |
author_sort | Chen, Ya-Mei |
collection | PubMed |
description | A growing body of evidence documents pervasive social and demographic factors relating to disparities in long-term care (LTC). In 2007, Taiwan implemented its Ten-year Long-Term Care Plan version 1.0 (TLTCP 1.0) that aimed to develop a home-and community-based (HCBS) LTC system. In 2016, Taiwan began to implement TLTCP 2.0. To continue providing effective LTC, this study aimed to assess the disparities in access to LTC services using Taiwan’s LTC claim database from 2010 to 2013. A total of 87,438 older adults who had applied for LTC services from the TLTCP 1.0 were included. The study assessed LTC disparities related to five sociodemographic factors, including age, gender, living status, urbanization, and income status. Sixteen types of LTC services, including HCBS, home-based professional care, meal services, transportation, and institutional services were assessed. After controlling for the level of disability, we found that those who were older-old (age 80> over), male, and low-income were less likely to use HCBS, but more likely to use institutions services (p < 0.001). We also found that those who lived in the city were more likely to use HCBS and transportation services (p < 0.001). Yet, older adults living alone were more likely to use home care and meal services but not other types of LTC services (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the social disparities in access to LTC services in Taiwan remains, suggesting LTC 2.0 should continue monitoring and placing the LTC equity issue on the top priority. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6845014 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68450142019-11-18 DISPARITIES IN ACCESSING DIFFERENT TYPES OF LONG-TERM CARE SERVICES IN TAIWAN Chen, Ya-Mei Lin, Shih-Chi Yu, Hsiao-Wei Wu, Shwu-Chong Wu, Shih-Cyuan Wang, Ying-Chieh Chiang, Tung-Liang Innov Aging Session 910 (Poster) A growing body of evidence documents pervasive social and demographic factors relating to disparities in long-term care (LTC). In 2007, Taiwan implemented its Ten-year Long-Term Care Plan version 1.0 (TLTCP 1.0) that aimed to develop a home-and community-based (HCBS) LTC system. In 2016, Taiwan began to implement TLTCP 2.0. To continue providing effective LTC, this study aimed to assess the disparities in access to LTC services using Taiwan’s LTC claim database from 2010 to 2013. A total of 87,438 older adults who had applied for LTC services from the TLTCP 1.0 were included. The study assessed LTC disparities related to five sociodemographic factors, including age, gender, living status, urbanization, and income status. Sixteen types of LTC services, including HCBS, home-based professional care, meal services, transportation, and institutional services were assessed. After controlling for the level of disability, we found that those who were older-old (age 80> over), male, and low-income were less likely to use HCBS, but more likely to use institutions services (p < 0.001). We also found that those who lived in the city were more likely to use HCBS and transportation services (p < 0.001). Yet, older adults living alone were more likely to use home care and meal services but not other types of LTC services (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the social disparities in access to LTC services in Taiwan remains, suggesting LTC 2.0 should continue monitoring and placing the LTC equity issue on the top priority. Oxford University Press 2019-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6845014/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.565 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Session 910 (Poster) Chen, Ya-Mei Lin, Shih-Chi Yu, Hsiao-Wei Wu, Shwu-Chong Wu, Shih-Cyuan Wang, Ying-Chieh Chiang, Tung-Liang DISPARITIES IN ACCESSING DIFFERENT TYPES OF LONG-TERM CARE SERVICES IN TAIWAN |
title | DISPARITIES IN ACCESSING DIFFERENT TYPES OF LONG-TERM CARE SERVICES IN TAIWAN |
title_full | DISPARITIES IN ACCESSING DIFFERENT TYPES OF LONG-TERM CARE SERVICES IN TAIWAN |
title_fullStr | DISPARITIES IN ACCESSING DIFFERENT TYPES OF LONG-TERM CARE SERVICES IN TAIWAN |
title_full_unstemmed | DISPARITIES IN ACCESSING DIFFERENT TYPES OF LONG-TERM CARE SERVICES IN TAIWAN |
title_short | DISPARITIES IN ACCESSING DIFFERENT TYPES OF LONG-TERM CARE SERVICES IN TAIWAN |
title_sort | disparities in accessing different types of long-term care services in taiwan |
topic | Session 910 (Poster) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6845014/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.565 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenyamei disparitiesinaccessingdifferenttypesoflongtermcareservicesintaiwan AT linshihchi disparitiesinaccessingdifferenttypesoflongtermcareservicesintaiwan AT yuhsiaowei disparitiesinaccessingdifferenttypesoflongtermcareservicesintaiwan AT wushwuchong disparitiesinaccessingdifferenttypesoflongtermcareservicesintaiwan AT wushihcyuan disparitiesinaccessingdifferenttypesoflongtermcareservicesintaiwan AT wangyingchieh disparitiesinaccessingdifferenttypesoflongtermcareservicesintaiwan AT chiangtungliang disparitiesinaccessingdifferenttypesoflongtermcareservicesintaiwan |