Cargando…

PUBLIC REPORTING OF NH ANTIPSYCHOTIC USE: CHANGES IN THE REPORTING OF EXCLUSIONARY DIAGNOSES?

Antipsychotics (APMs) are commonly used off-label to control behavioral symptoms of dementia in nursing home (NH) residents despite FDA warnings. As part of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) partnership to reduce the use of APMs in long-stay NH residents with dementia, CMS began...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lucas, Judith A, Bowblis, John R, Davis-Ajami, Mary Lynn, Simon, Kosali, Song, Miyeon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6845543/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.2838
_version_ 1783468690825543680
author Lucas, Judith A
Bowblis, John R
Davis-Ajami, Mary Lynn
Simon, Kosali
Song, Miyeon
author_facet Lucas, Judith A
Bowblis, John R
Davis-Ajami, Mary Lynn
Simon, Kosali
Song, Miyeon
author_sort Lucas, Judith A
collection PubMed
description Antipsychotics (APMs) are commonly used off-label to control behavioral symptoms of dementia in nursing home (NH) residents despite FDA warnings. As part of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) partnership to reduce the use of APMs in long-stay NH residents with dementia, CMS began publicly reporting an APM quality measure on the NH Compare website in July of 2012. This measure proxies for potentially “inappropriate” use by excluding residents with diagnoses in which APMs may be appropriate. While APM use as declined, some question if the quality measure creates an incentive to change documentation of exclusionary diagnoses to show improvements in the publicly reported APM quality measure. These exclusionary diagnoses include: Huntington’s disease, Tourette syndrome, and schizophrenia. Using Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments from long-stay NH residents in freestanding NHs (2011-2015), we utilized a difference-in-differences framework to compared the proportion of assessments with exclusionary diagnoses in NHs that were required to report the APM quality measure (treatment) to NHs that were exempt from reporting the measure (control). We also stratified the results by grouping residents under and over 65 year of age. We find no change in exclusionary diagnoses immediately following the implementation of public reporting. However, starting in 2014, the use of exclusionary diagnoses increased in the treatment group, especially among residents aged 65+. While APM use declined for all groups over the study period, our results indicate that the reduction in APM use may not be as large as expected, especially after 2014.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6845543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68455432019-11-18 PUBLIC REPORTING OF NH ANTIPSYCHOTIC USE: CHANGES IN THE REPORTING OF EXCLUSIONARY DIAGNOSES? Lucas, Judith A Bowblis, John R Davis-Ajami, Mary Lynn Simon, Kosali Song, Miyeon Innov Aging Session 3555 (Paper) Antipsychotics (APMs) are commonly used off-label to control behavioral symptoms of dementia in nursing home (NH) residents despite FDA warnings. As part of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) partnership to reduce the use of APMs in long-stay NH residents with dementia, CMS began publicly reporting an APM quality measure on the NH Compare website in July of 2012. This measure proxies for potentially “inappropriate” use by excluding residents with diagnoses in which APMs may be appropriate. While APM use as declined, some question if the quality measure creates an incentive to change documentation of exclusionary diagnoses to show improvements in the publicly reported APM quality measure. These exclusionary diagnoses include: Huntington’s disease, Tourette syndrome, and schizophrenia. Using Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments from long-stay NH residents in freestanding NHs (2011-2015), we utilized a difference-in-differences framework to compared the proportion of assessments with exclusionary diagnoses in NHs that were required to report the APM quality measure (treatment) to NHs that were exempt from reporting the measure (control). We also stratified the results by grouping residents under and over 65 year of age. We find no change in exclusionary diagnoses immediately following the implementation of public reporting. However, starting in 2014, the use of exclusionary diagnoses increased in the treatment group, especially among residents aged 65+. While APM use declined for all groups over the study period, our results indicate that the reduction in APM use may not be as large as expected, especially after 2014. Oxford University Press 2019-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6845543/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.2838 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Session 3555 (Paper)
Lucas, Judith A
Bowblis, John R
Davis-Ajami, Mary Lynn
Simon, Kosali
Song, Miyeon
PUBLIC REPORTING OF NH ANTIPSYCHOTIC USE: CHANGES IN THE REPORTING OF EXCLUSIONARY DIAGNOSES?
title PUBLIC REPORTING OF NH ANTIPSYCHOTIC USE: CHANGES IN THE REPORTING OF EXCLUSIONARY DIAGNOSES?
title_full PUBLIC REPORTING OF NH ANTIPSYCHOTIC USE: CHANGES IN THE REPORTING OF EXCLUSIONARY DIAGNOSES?
title_fullStr PUBLIC REPORTING OF NH ANTIPSYCHOTIC USE: CHANGES IN THE REPORTING OF EXCLUSIONARY DIAGNOSES?
title_full_unstemmed PUBLIC REPORTING OF NH ANTIPSYCHOTIC USE: CHANGES IN THE REPORTING OF EXCLUSIONARY DIAGNOSES?
title_short PUBLIC REPORTING OF NH ANTIPSYCHOTIC USE: CHANGES IN THE REPORTING OF EXCLUSIONARY DIAGNOSES?
title_sort public reporting of nh antipsychotic use: changes in the reporting of exclusionary diagnoses?
topic Session 3555 (Paper)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6845543/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.2838
work_keys_str_mv AT lucasjuditha publicreportingofnhantipsychoticusechangesinthereportingofexclusionarydiagnoses
AT bowblisjohnr publicreportingofnhantipsychoticusechangesinthereportingofexclusionarydiagnoses
AT davisajamimarylynn publicreportingofnhantipsychoticusechangesinthereportingofexclusionarydiagnoses
AT simonkosali publicreportingofnhantipsychoticusechangesinthereportingofexclusionarydiagnoses
AT songmiyeon publicreportingofnhantipsychoticusechangesinthereportingofexclusionarydiagnoses