Cargando…

BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS TO IMPLEMENTING COMMUNITY FIRST CHOICE

Community First Choice is a program within the Affordable Care Act that encourages states to expand Medicaid home and community-based services (HCBS). Specifically, this Medicaid state plan benefit provides states with an additional 6% federal match to promote greater rebalancing of long-term servic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beauregard, Lisa, Miller, Edward A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6846617/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.2837
_version_ 1783468918449373184
author Beauregard, Lisa
Miller, Edward A
author_facet Beauregard, Lisa
Miller, Edward A
author_sort Beauregard, Lisa
collection PubMed
description Community First Choice is a program within the Affordable Care Act that encourages states to expand Medicaid home and community-based services (HCBS). Specifically, this Medicaid state plan benefit provides states with an additional 6% federal match to promote greater rebalancing of long-term services and supports. Through Community First Choice, states can offer services that assist with activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, and health-related tasks. The program is optional for states, and, to date, eight states have pursued Community First Choice. The purpose of this study is to understand the barriers and facilitators to implementing Community First Choice in two states. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews with individuals involved in HCBS policy nationally and in Maryland and Texas, including government bureaucrats, consumer advocates, and provider representatives. The results suggest that communication with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the enhanced federal match, and leveraging existing HCBS infrastructure facilitated implementation. Maryland and Texas encountered challenges implementing Community First Choice because of constraints posed by existing HCBS programs, ambitious timelines, limited staff resources, and insufficient engagement with external stakeholders. The findings suggest that implementing Community First Choice is a large undertaking, and states should ensure they have enough time and sufficient staffing for the implementation process. States should also understand how implementing Community First Choice will impact existing HCBS offerings and how leveraging HCBS infrastructure can facilitate implementation. The lessons from implementing Community First Choice can be informative to other states pursuing or contemplating this program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6846617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68466172019-11-18 BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS TO IMPLEMENTING COMMUNITY FIRST CHOICE Beauregard, Lisa Miller, Edward A Innov Aging Session 3555 (Paper) Community First Choice is a program within the Affordable Care Act that encourages states to expand Medicaid home and community-based services (HCBS). Specifically, this Medicaid state plan benefit provides states with an additional 6% federal match to promote greater rebalancing of long-term services and supports. Through Community First Choice, states can offer services that assist with activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, and health-related tasks. The program is optional for states, and, to date, eight states have pursued Community First Choice. The purpose of this study is to understand the barriers and facilitators to implementing Community First Choice in two states. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews with individuals involved in HCBS policy nationally and in Maryland and Texas, including government bureaucrats, consumer advocates, and provider representatives. The results suggest that communication with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the enhanced federal match, and leveraging existing HCBS infrastructure facilitated implementation. Maryland and Texas encountered challenges implementing Community First Choice because of constraints posed by existing HCBS programs, ambitious timelines, limited staff resources, and insufficient engagement with external stakeholders. The findings suggest that implementing Community First Choice is a large undertaking, and states should ensure they have enough time and sufficient staffing for the implementation process. States should also understand how implementing Community First Choice will impact existing HCBS offerings and how leveraging HCBS infrastructure can facilitate implementation. The lessons from implementing Community First Choice can be informative to other states pursuing or contemplating this program. Oxford University Press 2019-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6846617/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.2837 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Session 3555 (Paper)
Beauregard, Lisa
Miller, Edward A
BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS TO IMPLEMENTING COMMUNITY FIRST CHOICE
title BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS TO IMPLEMENTING COMMUNITY FIRST CHOICE
title_full BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS TO IMPLEMENTING COMMUNITY FIRST CHOICE
title_fullStr BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS TO IMPLEMENTING COMMUNITY FIRST CHOICE
title_full_unstemmed BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS TO IMPLEMENTING COMMUNITY FIRST CHOICE
title_short BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS TO IMPLEMENTING COMMUNITY FIRST CHOICE
title_sort barriers and facilitators to implementing community first choice
topic Session 3555 (Paper)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6846617/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.2837
work_keys_str_mv AT beauregardlisa barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingcommunityfirstchoice
AT milleredwarda barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingcommunityfirstchoice