Cargando…
Neutrophil activation causes tumor regression in Walker 256 tumor-bearing rats
The role of neutrophils in cancer is still very contradictory. Several studies have demonstrated the cytotoxic capacity of neutrophils against different types of tumors, by releasing inflammatory cytokines, ROS and activating other immune cells. On the other hand, recent papers have claimed the prot...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6848483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31712726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52956-2 |
_version_ | 1783469075901448192 |
---|---|
author | Kuwabara, Wilson Mitsuo Tatagiba Andrade-Silva, Jéssica Pereira, Joice Naiara Bertaglia Scialfa, Julieta Helena Cipolla-Neto, José |
author_facet | Kuwabara, Wilson Mitsuo Tatagiba Andrade-Silva, Jéssica Pereira, Joice Naiara Bertaglia Scialfa, Julieta Helena Cipolla-Neto, José |
author_sort | Kuwabara, Wilson Mitsuo Tatagiba |
collection | PubMed |
description | The role of neutrophils in cancer is still very contradictory. Several studies have demonstrated the cytotoxic capacity of neutrophils against different types of tumors, by releasing inflammatory cytokines, ROS and activating other immune cells. On the other hand, recent papers have claimed the protumorigenic action of neutrophils, mainly by changing their phenotype and producing cytokines that promote tumor growth. In this context, this study aimed to evaluate neutrophil action and function during tumor development. To do so, we used male Wistar rats inoculated with Walker 256 breast carcinoma. Tumor, circulating neutrophils and bone marrow were studied in the following time points after tumor inoculation: 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, 3 d, 5 d, 7 d, 10 d, and 14 d, in order to analyze neutrophil migration kinetics, circulating neutrophil phenotype and bone marrow response to the tumor growth. Herein, our results demonstrated that W256T was unable to trigger an intratumoral inflammatory response after 5 days of tumor development and consequently, from that point on, prevented neutrophil migration to its microenvironment. Also, the tumor changed circulating neutrophil phenotype by up-regulating inflammation-related genes. Even though circulating neutrophils were entirely able to respond to an inflammatory stimulus, they did not recognize and attack the tumor, allowing the tumor to grow without any immune interference. To promote the entry of neutrophils into the tumor microenvironment, LPS was injected intratumorally. Neutrophil migration and activation due to LPS injection resulted in complete tumor regression in all subjects. In conclusion, activating neutrophils, within the tumor, turned the carcinoma into a recognizable immune target and eliminated it. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6848483 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68484832019-11-19 Neutrophil activation causes tumor regression in Walker 256 tumor-bearing rats Kuwabara, Wilson Mitsuo Tatagiba Andrade-Silva, Jéssica Pereira, Joice Naiara Bertaglia Scialfa, Julieta Helena Cipolla-Neto, José Sci Rep Article The role of neutrophils in cancer is still very contradictory. Several studies have demonstrated the cytotoxic capacity of neutrophils against different types of tumors, by releasing inflammatory cytokines, ROS and activating other immune cells. On the other hand, recent papers have claimed the protumorigenic action of neutrophils, mainly by changing their phenotype and producing cytokines that promote tumor growth. In this context, this study aimed to evaluate neutrophil action and function during tumor development. To do so, we used male Wistar rats inoculated with Walker 256 breast carcinoma. Tumor, circulating neutrophils and bone marrow were studied in the following time points after tumor inoculation: 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, 3 d, 5 d, 7 d, 10 d, and 14 d, in order to analyze neutrophil migration kinetics, circulating neutrophil phenotype and bone marrow response to the tumor growth. Herein, our results demonstrated that W256T was unable to trigger an intratumoral inflammatory response after 5 days of tumor development and consequently, from that point on, prevented neutrophil migration to its microenvironment. Also, the tumor changed circulating neutrophil phenotype by up-regulating inflammation-related genes. Even though circulating neutrophils were entirely able to respond to an inflammatory stimulus, they did not recognize and attack the tumor, allowing the tumor to grow without any immune interference. To promote the entry of neutrophils into the tumor microenvironment, LPS was injected intratumorally. Neutrophil migration and activation due to LPS injection resulted in complete tumor regression in all subjects. In conclusion, activating neutrophils, within the tumor, turned the carcinoma into a recognizable immune target and eliminated it. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6848483/ /pubmed/31712726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52956-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Kuwabara, Wilson Mitsuo Tatagiba Andrade-Silva, Jéssica Pereira, Joice Naiara Bertaglia Scialfa, Julieta Helena Cipolla-Neto, José Neutrophil activation causes tumor regression in Walker 256 tumor-bearing rats |
title | Neutrophil activation causes tumor regression in Walker 256 tumor-bearing rats |
title_full | Neutrophil activation causes tumor regression in Walker 256 tumor-bearing rats |
title_fullStr | Neutrophil activation causes tumor regression in Walker 256 tumor-bearing rats |
title_full_unstemmed | Neutrophil activation causes tumor regression in Walker 256 tumor-bearing rats |
title_short | Neutrophil activation causes tumor regression in Walker 256 tumor-bearing rats |
title_sort | neutrophil activation causes tumor regression in walker 256 tumor-bearing rats |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6848483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31712726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52956-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuwabarawilsonmitsuotatagiba neutrophilactivationcausestumorregressioninwalker256tumorbearingrats AT andradesilvajessica neutrophilactivationcausestumorregressioninwalker256tumorbearingrats AT pereirajoicenaiarabertaglia neutrophilactivationcausestumorregressioninwalker256tumorbearingrats AT scialfajulietahelena neutrophilactivationcausestumorregressioninwalker256tumorbearingrats AT cipollanetojose neutrophilactivationcausestumorregressioninwalker256tumorbearingrats |