Cargando…

Preference for Subcutaneously Administered Low-Dose Glucagon Versus Orally Administered Glucose for Treatment of Mild Hypoglycemia: A Prospective Survey Study

INTRODUCTION: Intensive insulin treatment for type 1 diabetes is associated with high risk of mild hypoglycemia. Mild hypoglycemia is usually treated orally with glucose, which may contribute to weight gain. Subcutaneous injection of low-dose glucagon may be a new treatment option for some occasions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tetzschner, Rikke, Ranjan, Ajenthen G., Schmidt, Signe, Nørgaard, Kirsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6848710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31552599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-00696-x
_version_ 1783469083122991104
author Tetzschner, Rikke
Ranjan, Ajenthen G.
Schmidt, Signe
Nørgaard, Kirsten
author_facet Tetzschner, Rikke
Ranjan, Ajenthen G.
Schmidt, Signe
Nørgaard, Kirsten
author_sort Tetzschner, Rikke
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Intensive insulin treatment for type 1 diabetes is associated with high risk of mild hypoglycemia. Mild hypoglycemia is usually treated orally with glucose, which may contribute to weight gain. Subcutaneous injection of low-dose glucagon may be a new treatment option for some occasions of mild hypoglycemia in individuals aiming for optimal glycemic control without gaining weight. We investigated under which occasions patients were interested to use low-dose glucagon. METHODS: In a prospective 2-week event-driven survey, participants registered every event of mild hypoglycemia (sensor or blood glucose ≤ 3.9 mmol/l and/or hypoglycemia symptoms). For each hypoglycemia event, participants registered whether they would have preferred to use low-dose glucagon if the treatment had been available. RESULTS: A total of 51 participants (13 men, mean ± SD age 43.6 ± 12.5 years, HbA1c 7.3 ± 0.7% (57 ± 8 mmol/mol), BMI 24.9 ± 3 kg/m(2)) were included. Each participant had on average 10 (range 3–23) mild hypoglycemia events during the 2-week survey period. Glucagon was preferred in 58% of the 514 mild hypoglycemia events (p > 0.05). Twelve percent of the participants had no desire to use glucagon for any hypoglycemia event. The preference pattern did not differ between sex, patient treatment modalities, and possible causes for hypoglycemia (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study showed that a majority of our participants with type 1 diabetes were interested in using low-dose glucagon for the treatment of mild hypoglycemia. FUNDING: This work was funded by a research grant from the Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre and by the Danish Diabetes Academy supported by the Novo Nordisk Foundation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6848710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68487102019-11-22 Preference for Subcutaneously Administered Low-Dose Glucagon Versus Orally Administered Glucose for Treatment of Mild Hypoglycemia: A Prospective Survey Study Tetzschner, Rikke Ranjan, Ajenthen G. Schmidt, Signe Nørgaard, Kirsten Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Intensive insulin treatment for type 1 diabetes is associated with high risk of mild hypoglycemia. Mild hypoglycemia is usually treated orally with glucose, which may contribute to weight gain. Subcutaneous injection of low-dose glucagon may be a new treatment option for some occasions of mild hypoglycemia in individuals aiming for optimal glycemic control without gaining weight. We investigated under which occasions patients were interested to use low-dose glucagon. METHODS: In a prospective 2-week event-driven survey, participants registered every event of mild hypoglycemia (sensor or blood glucose ≤ 3.9 mmol/l and/or hypoglycemia symptoms). For each hypoglycemia event, participants registered whether they would have preferred to use low-dose glucagon if the treatment had been available. RESULTS: A total of 51 participants (13 men, mean ± SD age 43.6 ± 12.5 years, HbA1c 7.3 ± 0.7% (57 ± 8 mmol/mol), BMI 24.9 ± 3 kg/m(2)) were included. Each participant had on average 10 (range 3–23) mild hypoglycemia events during the 2-week survey period. Glucagon was preferred in 58% of the 514 mild hypoglycemia events (p > 0.05). Twelve percent of the participants had no desire to use glucagon for any hypoglycemia event. The preference pattern did not differ between sex, patient treatment modalities, and possible causes for hypoglycemia (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study showed that a majority of our participants with type 1 diabetes were interested in using low-dose glucagon for the treatment of mild hypoglycemia. FUNDING: This work was funded by a research grant from the Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre and by the Danish Diabetes Academy supported by the Novo Nordisk Foundation. Springer Healthcare 2019-09-24 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6848710/ /pubmed/31552599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-00696-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Tetzschner, Rikke
Ranjan, Ajenthen G.
Schmidt, Signe
Nørgaard, Kirsten
Preference for Subcutaneously Administered Low-Dose Glucagon Versus Orally Administered Glucose for Treatment of Mild Hypoglycemia: A Prospective Survey Study
title Preference for Subcutaneously Administered Low-Dose Glucagon Versus Orally Administered Glucose for Treatment of Mild Hypoglycemia: A Prospective Survey Study
title_full Preference for Subcutaneously Administered Low-Dose Glucagon Versus Orally Administered Glucose for Treatment of Mild Hypoglycemia: A Prospective Survey Study
title_fullStr Preference for Subcutaneously Administered Low-Dose Glucagon Versus Orally Administered Glucose for Treatment of Mild Hypoglycemia: A Prospective Survey Study
title_full_unstemmed Preference for Subcutaneously Administered Low-Dose Glucagon Versus Orally Administered Glucose for Treatment of Mild Hypoglycemia: A Prospective Survey Study
title_short Preference for Subcutaneously Administered Low-Dose Glucagon Versus Orally Administered Glucose for Treatment of Mild Hypoglycemia: A Prospective Survey Study
title_sort preference for subcutaneously administered low-dose glucagon versus orally administered glucose for treatment of mild hypoglycemia: a prospective survey study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6848710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31552599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-00696-x
work_keys_str_mv AT tetzschnerrikke preferenceforsubcutaneouslyadministeredlowdoseglucagonversusorallyadministeredglucosefortreatmentofmildhypoglycemiaaprospectivesurveystudy
AT ranjanajentheng preferenceforsubcutaneouslyadministeredlowdoseglucagonversusorallyadministeredglucosefortreatmentofmildhypoglycemiaaprospectivesurveystudy
AT schmidtsigne preferenceforsubcutaneouslyadministeredlowdoseglucagonversusorallyadministeredglucosefortreatmentofmildhypoglycemiaaprospectivesurveystudy
AT nørgaardkirsten preferenceforsubcutaneouslyadministeredlowdoseglucagonversusorallyadministeredglucosefortreatmentofmildhypoglycemiaaprospectivesurveystudy