Cargando…
Probiotics for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Meta-Analysis
Background: The effect of probiotic therapy on bacterial vaginosis (BV) is controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety associated with probiotic treatment for BV. Methods: We searched multiple databases covering up to 1 March 2018. Studies published as blinded randomized c...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6848925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31614736 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203859 |
_version_ | 1783469103478996992 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Ziyue He, Yining Zheng, Yingjie |
author_facet | Wang, Ziyue He, Yining Zheng, Yingjie |
author_sort | Wang, Ziyue |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The effect of probiotic therapy on bacterial vaginosis (BV) is controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety associated with probiotic treatment for BV. Methods: We searched multiple databases covering up to 1 March 2018. Studies published as blinded randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparing treatment using probiotic versus active or placebo control in BV patients were included, with at least one-month follow-up. Random effects model and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were applied. Results: Ten studies (n = 2321) were included. Compared with placebo, the probiotics-only therapy resulted in a beneficial outcome both in clinical cure rate at the 30th day (risk ratio, RR = 2.57; 95% confidential interval, 95% CI: 1.96 to 3.37), and Nugent score (mean difference, MD = −2.71; 95% CI: −3.41 to −2.00). This effect decreased but remained significant after eight weeks. Probiotics-post-antibiotics therapy had a decreased effect only for a short term and possibly among studies with a mostly black study population. No extra adverse events were observed. The TSA suggested a larger sample size for effective evaluation of the probiotics as a supplementary remedy. Conclusions: Probiotic regimes are safe and may exhibit a short-term and long-term beneficial effect for BV treatment. The ethnic-specific result for the probiotic used after antibiotics is worthy of further study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6848925 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68489252019-11-18 Probiotics for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Meta-Analysis Wang, Ziyue He, Yining Zheng, Yingjie Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Background: The effect of probiotic therapy on bacterial vaginosis (BV) is controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety associated with probiotic treatment for BV. Methods: We searched multiple databases covering up to 1 March 2018. Studies published as blinded randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparing treatment using probiotic versus active or placebo control in BV patients were included, with at least one-month follow-up. Random effects model and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were applied. Results: Ten studies (n = 2321) were included. Compared with placebo, the probiotics-only therapy resulted in a beneficial outcome both in clinical cure rate at the 30th day (risk ratio, RR = 2.57; 95% confidential interval, 95% CI: 1.96 to 3.37), and Nugent score (mean difference, MD = −2.71; 95% CI: −3.41 to −2.00). This effect decreased but remained significant after eight weeks. Probiotics-post-antibiotics therapy had a decreased effect only for a short term and possibly among studies with a mostly black study population. No extra adverse events were observed. The TSA suggested a larger sample size for effective evaluation of the probiotics as a supplementary remedy. Conclusions: Probiotic regimes are safe and may exhibit a short-term and long-term beneficial effect for BV treatment. The ethnic-specific result for the probiotic used after antibiotics is worthy of further study. MDPI 2019-10-12 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6848925/ /pubmed/31614736 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203859 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Wang, Ziyue He, Yining Zheng, Yingjie Probiotics for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Probiotics for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Probiotics for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Probiotics for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Probiotics for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Probiotics for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | probiotics for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6848925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31614736 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203859 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangziyue probioticsforthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosisametaanalysis AT heyining probioticsforthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosisametaanalysis AT zhengyingjie probioticsforthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosisametaanalysis |