Cargando…

Probiotics for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Meta-Analysis

Background: The effect of probiotic therapy on bacterial vaginosis (BV) is controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety associated with probiotic treatment for BV. Methods: We searched multiple databases covering up to 1 March 2018. Studies published as blinded randomized c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Ziyue, He, Yining, Zheng, Yingjie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6848925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31614736
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203859
_version_ 1783469103478996992
author Wang, Ziyue
He, Yining
Zheng, Yingjie
author_facet Wang, Ziyue
He, Yining
Zheng, Yingjie
author_sort Wang, Ziyue
collection PubMed
description Background: The effect of probiotic therapy on bacterial vaginosis (BV) is controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety associated with probiotic treatment for BV. Methods: We searched multiple databases covering up to 1 March 2018. Studies published as blinded randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparing treatment using probiotic versus active or placebo control in BV patients were included, with at least one-month follow-up. Random effects model and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were applied. Results: Ten studies (n = 2321) were included. Compared with placebo, the probiotics-only therapy resulted in a beneficial outcome both in clinical cure rate at the 30th day (risk ratio, RR = 2.57; 95% confidential interval, 95% CI: 1.96 to 3.37), and Nugent score (mean difference, MD = −2.71; 95% CI: −3.41 to −2.00). This effect decreased but remained significant after eight weeks. Probiotics-post-antibiotics therapy had a decreased effect only for a short term and possibly among studies with a mostly black study population. No extra adverse events were observed. The TSA suggested a larger sample size for effective evaluation of the probiotics as a supplementary remedy. Conclusions: Probiotic regimes are safe and may exhibit a short-term and long-term beneficial effect for BV treatment. The ethnic-specific result for the probiotic used after antibiotics is worthy of further study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6848925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68489252019-11-18 Probiotics for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Meta-Analysis Wang, Ziyue He, Yining Zheng, Yingjie Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Background: The effect of probiotic therapy on bacterial vaginosis (BV) is controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety associated with probiotic treatment for BV. Methods: We searched multiple databases covering up to 1 March 2018. Studies published as blinded randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparing treatment using probiotic versus active or placebo control in BV patients were included, with at least one-month follow-up. Random effects model and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were applied. Results: Ten studies (n = 2321) were included. Compared with placebo, the probiotics-only therapy resulted in a beneficial outcome both in clinical cure rate at the 30th day (risk ratio, RR = 2.57; 95% confidential interval, 95% CI: 1.96 to 3.37), and Nugent score (mean difference, MD = −2.71; 95% CI: −3.41 to −2.00). This effect decreased but remained significant after eight weeks. Probiotics-post-antibiotics therapy had a decreased effect only for a short term and possibly among studies with a mostly black study population. No extra adverse events were observed. The TSA suggested a larger sample size for effective evaluation of the probiotics as a supplementary remedy. Conclusions: Probiotic regimes are safe and may exhibit a short-term and long-term beneficial effect for BV treatment. The ethnic-specific result for the probiotic used after antibiotics is worthy of further study. MDPI 2019-10-12 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6848925/ /pubmed/31614736 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203859 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Wang, Ziyue
He, Yining
Zheng, Yingjie
Probiotics for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Meta-Analysis
title Probiotics for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Probiotics for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Probiotics for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Probiotics for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Probiotics for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort probiotics for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6848925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31614736
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203859
work_keys_str_mv AT wangziyue probioticsforthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosisametaanalysis
AT heyining probioticsforthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosisametaanalysis
AT zhengyingjie probioticsforthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosisametaanalysis