Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of the SLIMMER diabetes prevention intervention in Dutch primary health care: economic evaluation from a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Although evidence is accumulating that lifestyle modification may be cost-effective in patients with prediabetes, information is limited on the cost-effectiveness of interventions implemented in public health and primary health care settings. Evidence from well-conducted pragmatic trials...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31711499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4529-8 |
_version_ | 1783469168092250112 |
---|---|
author | Duijzer, Geerke Bukman, Andrea J. Meints-Groenveld, Aafke Haveman-Nies, Annemien Jansen, Sophia C. Heinrich, Judith Hiddink, Gerrit J. Feskens, Edith J. M. de Wit, G. Ardine |
author_facet | Duijzer, Geerke Bukman, Andrea J. Meints-Groenveld, Aafke Haveman-Nies, Annemien Jansen, Sophia C. Heinrich, Judith Hiddink, Gerrit J. Feskens, Edith J. M. de Wit, G. Ardine |
author_sort | Duijzer, Geerke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although evidence is accumulating that lifestyle modification may be cost-effective in patients with prediabetes, information is limited on the cost-effectiveness of interventions implemented in public health and primary health care settings. Evidence from well-conducted pragmatic trials is needed to gain insight into the realistic cost-effectiveness of diabetes prevention interventions in real-world settings. The aim of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of the SLIMMER lifestyle intervention targeted at patients at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared with usual health care in a primary care setting in the Netherlands. METHODS: Three hundred and sixteen high-risk subjects were randomly assigned to the SLIMMER lifestyle intervention or to usual health care. Costs and outcome assessments were performed at the end of the intervention (12 months) and six months thereafter (18 months). Costs were assessed from a societal perspective. Patients completed questionnaires to assess health care utilisation, participant out-of-pocket costs, and productivity losses. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) were calculated based on the SF-36 questionnaire. Cost-effectiveness planes and acceptability curves were generated using bootstrap analyses. RESULTS: The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the incremental costs of the SLIMMER lifestyle intervention were €547 and that the incremental effect was 0.02 QALY, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €28,094/QALY. When cost-effectiveness was calculated from a health care perspective, the ICER decreased to €13,605/QALY, with a moderate probability of being cost-effective (56% at a willingness to pay, WTP, of €20,000/QALY and 81% at a WTP of €80,000/QALY). CONCLUSIONS: The SLIMMER lifestyle intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes had a low to moderate probability of being cost-effective, depending on the perspective taken. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The SLIMMER study is retrospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT02094911) since March 19, 2014. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6849241 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68492412019-11-15 Cost-effectiveness of the SLIMMER diabetes prevention intervention in Dutch primary health care: economic evaluation from a randomised controlled trial Duijzer, Geerke Bukman, Andrea J. Meints-Groenveld, Aafke Haveman-Nies, Annemien Jansen, Sophia C. Heinrich, Judith Hiddink, Gerrit J. Feskens, Edith J. M. de Wit, G. Ardine BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Although evidence is accumulating that lifestyle modification may be cost-effective in patients with prediabetes, information is limited on the cost-effectiveness of interventions implemented in public health and primary health care settings. Evidence from well-conducted pragmatic trials is needed to gain insight into the realistic cost-effectiveness of diabetes prevention interventions in real-world settings. The aim of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of the SLIMMER lifestyle intervention targeted at patients at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared with usual health care in a primary care setting in the Netherlands. METHODS: Three hundred and sixteen high-risk subjects were randomly assigned to the SLIMMER lifestyle intervention or to usual health care. Costs and outcome assessments were performed at the end of the intervention (12 months) and six months thereafter (18 months). Costs were assessed from a societal perspective. Patients completed questionnaires to assess health care utilisation, participant out-of-pocket costs, and productivity losses. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) were calculated based on the SF-36 questionnaire. Cost-effectiveness planes and acceptability curves were generated using bootstrap analyses. RESULTS: The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the incremental costs of the SLIMMER lifestyle intervention were €547 and that the incremental effect was 0.02 QALY, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €28,094/QALY. When cost-effectiveness was calculated from a health care perspective, the ICER decreased to €13,605/QALY, with a moderate probability of being cost-effective (56% at a willingness to pay, WTP, of €20,000/QALY and 81% at a WTP of €80,000/QALY). CONCLUSIONS: The SLIMMER lifestyle intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes had a low to moderate probability of being cost-effective, depending on the perspective taken. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The SLIMMER study is retrospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT02094911) since March 19, 2014. BioMed Central 2019-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6849241/ /pubmed/31711499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4529-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Duijzer, Geerke Bukman, Andrea J. Meints-Groenveld, Aafke Haveman-Nies, Annemien Jansen, Sophia C. Heinrich, Judith Hiddink, Gerrit J. Feskens, Edith J. M. de Wit, G. Ardine Cost-effectiveness of the SLIMMER diabetes prevention intervention in Dutch primary health care: economic evaluation from a randomised controlled trial |
title | Cost-effectiveness of the SLIMMER diabetes prevention intervention in Dutch primary health care: economic evaluation from a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of the SLIMMER diabetes prevention intervention in Dutch primary health care: economic evaluation from a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of the SLIMMER diabetes prevention intervention in Dutch primary health care: economic evaluation from a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of the SLIMMER diabetes prevention intervention in Dutch primary health care: economic evaluation from a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of the SLIMMER diabetes prevention intervention in Dutch primary health care: economic evaluation from a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of the slimmer diabetes prevention intervention in dutch primary health care: economic evaluation from a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31711499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4529-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duijzergeerke costeffectivenessoftheslimmerdiabetespreventioninterventionindutchprimaryhealthcareeconomicevaluationfromarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bukmanandreaj costeffectivenessoftheslimmerdiabetespreventioninterventionindutchprimaryhealthcareeconomicevaluationfromarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT meintsgroenveldaafke costeffectivenessoftheslimmerdiabetespreventioninterventionindutchprimaryhealthcareeconomicevaluationfromarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT havemanniesannemien costeffectivenessoftheslimmerdiabetespreventioninterventionindutchprimaryhealthcareeconomicevaluationfromarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT jansensophiac costeffectivenessoftheslimmerdiabetespreventioninterventionindutchprimaryhealthcareeconomicevaluationfromarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT heinrichjudith costeffectivenessoftheslimmerdiabetespreventioninterventionindutchprimaryhealthcareeconomicevaluationfromarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hiddinkgerritj costeffectivenessoftheslimmerdiabetespreventioninterventionindutchprimaryhealthcareeconomicevaluationfromarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT feskensedithjm costeffectivenessoftheslimmerdiabetespreventioninterventionindutchprimaryhealthcareeconomicevaluationfromarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT dewitgardine costeffectivenessoftheslimmerdiabetespreventioninterventionindutchprimaryhealthcareeconomicevaluationfromarandomisedcontrolledtrial |