Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of two commercial ELISA kits for detection of antibodies against Akabane virus in cattle serum

BACKGROUND: Akabane disease (AD), a barrier to international trade for endemic areas with far economic impact on the countries, is caused by Akabane virus (AKAV). Commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is a commonly used diagnostic technique for AKAV infection, including the IDEXX and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xiaolin, Jing, Hongli, Liu, Xiaofei, Wang, Qin, Qiu, Songyin, Liu, Dandan, Wu, Shaoqiang, Lin, Xiangmei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31711494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2156-6
_version_ 1783469176700010496
author Li, Xiaolin
Jing, Hongli
Liu, Xiaofei
Wang, Qin
Qiu, Songyin
Liu, Dandan
Wu, Shaoqiang
Lin, Xiangmei
author_facet Li, Xiaolin
Jing, Hongli
Liu, Xiaofei
Wang, Qin
Qiu, Songyin
Liu, Dandan
Wu, Shaoqiang
Lin, Xiangmei
author_sort Li, Xiaolin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Akabane disease (AD), a barrier to international trade for endemic areas with far economic impact on the countries, is caused by Akabane virus (AKAV). Commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is a commonly used diagnostic technique for AKAV infection, including the IDEXX and IDVET ELISA kits. However, the comparative evaluation of the IDEXX and IDVET ELISA kits has not been published. The object of this study was to evaluate the test performance of the two commercial ELISA kits in detecting serum anti-AKAV antibodies in cattle. RESULTS: With virus neutralization test (VNT) as the “relative gold standard”, the diagnostic sensitivity (DSe) was 80.39% (123/153) and 93.46% (143/153) for the IDEXX and IDVET ELISA kit, when suspect samples were included. The diagnostic specificity (DSp) for the IDEXX and IDVET ELISA kit was 93.48% (502/537) and 82.31% (442/537), respectively. CONCLUSION: Both of the tested ELISA kits could be applied to detect antibodies against AKAV in cattle serum. The IDVET ELISA kit had a higher DSe. The IDEXX ELISA kit possessed the higher DSp. These results have important implications if the kits are used to screen herds or individual cattle in surveillance programs, or at border crossings for import-export inspection and quarantine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6849277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68492772019-11-15 Comparative evaluation of two commercial ELISA kits for detection of antibodies against Akabane virus in cattle serum Li, Xiaolin Jing, Hongli Liu, Xiaofei Wang, Qin Qiu, Songyin Liu, Dandan Wu, Shaoqiang Lin, Xiangmei BMC Vet Res Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Akabane disease (AD), a barrier to international trade for endemic areas with far economic impact on the countries, is caused by Akabane virus (AKAV). Commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is a commonly used diagnostic technique for AKAV infection, including the IDEXX and IDVET ELISA kits. However, the comparative evaluation of the IDEXX and IDVET ELISA kits has not been published. The object of this study was to evaluate the test performance of the two commercial ELISA kits in detecting serum anti-AKAV antibodies in cattle. RESULTS: With virus neutralization test (VNT) as the “relative gold standard”, the diagnostic sensitivity (DSe) was 80.39% (123/153) and 93.46% (143/153) for the IDEXX and IDVET ELISA kit, when suspect samples were included. The diagnostic specificity (DSp) for the IDEXX and IDVET ELISA kit was 93.48% (502/537) and 82.31% (442/537), respectively. CONCLUSION: Both of the tested ELISA kits could be applied to detect antibodies against AKAV in cattle serum. The IDVET ELISA kit had a higher DSe. The IDEXX ELISA kit possessed the higher DSp. These results have important implications if the kits are used to screen herds or individual cattle in surveillance programs, or at border crossings for import-export inspection and quarantine. BioMed Central 2019-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6849277/ /pubmed/31711494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2156-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Li, Xiaolin
Jing, Hongli
Liu, Xiaofei
Wang, Qin
Qiu, Songyin
Liu, Dandan
Wu, Shaoqiang
Lin, Xiangmei
Comparative evaluation of two commercial ELISA kits for detection of antibodies against Akabane virus in cattle serum
title Comparative evaluation of two commercial ELISA kits for detection of antibodies against Akabane virus in cattle serum
title_full Comparative evaluation of two commercial ELISA kits for detection of antibodies against Akabane virus in cattle serum
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of two commercial ELISA kits for detection of antibodies against Akabane virus in cattle serum
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of two commercial ELISA kits for detection of antibodies against Akabane virus in cattle serum
title_short Comparative evaluation of two commercial ELISA kits for detection of antibodies against Akabane virus in cattle serum
title_sort comparative evaluation of two commercial elisa kits for detection of antibodies against akabane virus in cattle serum
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31711494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2156-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lixiaolin comparativeevaluationoftwocommercialelisakitsfordetectionofantibodiesagainstakabanevirusincattleserum
AT jinghongli comparativeevaluationoftwocommercialelisakitsfordetectionofantibodiesagainstakabanevirusincattleserum
AT liuxiaofei comparativeevaluationoftwocommercialelisakitsfordetectionofantibodiesagainstakabanevirusincattleserum
AT wangqin comparativeevaluationoftwocommercialelisakitsfordetectionofantibodiesagainstakabanevirusincattleserum
AT qiusongyin comparativeevaluationoftwocommercialelisakitsfordetectionofantibodiesagainstakabanevirusincattleserum
AT liudandan comparativeevaluationoftwocommercialelisakitsfordetectionofantibodiesagainstakabanevirusincattleserum
AT wushaoqiang comparativeevaluationoftwocommercialelisakitsfordetectionofantibodiesagainstakabanevirusincattleserum
AT linxiangmei comparativeevaluationoftwocommercialelisakitsfordetectionofantibodiesagainstakabanevirusincattleserum