Cargando…

Adjuvant versus early salvage radiotherapy: outcome of patients with prostate cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant (ART) and salvage radiotherapy (SRT) are two common concepts to enhance biochemical relapse free survival (BCRFS) in patients with prostate cancer (PC). We analyzed differences in outcome between ART and SRT in patients with steep decline of PSA-levels after surgery to compare o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vogel, Marco M. E., Kessel, Kerstin A., Schiller, Kilian, Devecka, Michal, Gschwend, Jürgen E., Weichert, Wilko, Wilkens, Jan J., Combs, Stephanie E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31711524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1391-0
_version_ 1783469198645657600
author Vogel, Marco M. E.
Kessel, Kerstin A.
Schiller, Kilian
Devecka, Michal
Gschwend, Jürgen E.
Weichert, Wilko
Wilkens, Jan J.
Combs, Stephanie E.
author_facet Vogel, Marco M. E.
Kessel, Kerstin A.
Schiller, Kilian
Devecka, Michal
Gschwend, Jürgen E.
Weichert, Wilko
Wilkens, Jan J.
Combs, Stephanie E.
author_sort Vogel, Marco M. E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adjuvant (ART) and salvage radiotherapy (SRT) are two common concepts to enhance biochemical relapse free survival (BCRFS) in patients with prostate cancer (PC). We analyzed differences in outcome between ART and SRT in patients with steep decline of PSA-levels after surgery to compare outcome. METHODS: We evaluated 253 patients treated with postoperative RT with a median age of 66 years (range 42–85 years) treated between 2004 and 2014. Patients with additive radiotherapy due to PSA persistence and patients in the SRT group, who did not achieve a postoperative PSA level <0.1 ng/mL were excluded. Hence, data of 179 patients was evaluated. We used propensity score matching to build homogenous groups. A Cox regression model was used to determine differences between treatment options. Median follow-up was 32.5 months (range 1.4–128.0 months). RESULTS: Early SRT at PSA levels <0.3 ng/mL was associated with significant longer BCRFS than late SRT (HR: 0.32, 95%-CI: 0.14–0.75, p = 0.009). Multiple Cox regression showed pre-RT PSA level, tumor stage, and Gleason score as predictive factors for biochemical relapse. In the overall group, patients treated with either ART or early SRT showed no significant difference in BCRFS (HR: 0.17, 95%-CI: 0.02–1.44, p = 0.1). In patients with locally advanced PC (pT3/4) BCRFS was similar in both groups as well (HR: 0.21, 95%-CI:0.02–1.79, p = 0.15). CONCLUSION: For patients with PSA-triggered follow-up, close observation is essential and early initiation of local treatment at low PSA levels (<0.3 ng/mL) is beneficial. Our data suggest, that SRT administered at early PSA rise might be equieffective to postoperative ART in patients with locally advanced PC. However, the individual treatment decision must be based on any adverse risk factors and the patients’ postoperative clinical condition. STUDY REGISTRATION: The present work is approved by the Ethics Commission of the Technical University of Munich (TUM) and is registered with the project number 320/14.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6849377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68493772019-11-20 Adjuvant versus early salvage radiotherapy: outcome of patients with prostate cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy Vogel, Marco M. E. Kessel, Kerstin A. Schiller, Kilian Devecka, Michal Gschwend, Jürgen E. Weichert, Wilko Wilkens, Jan J. Combs, Stephanie E. Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Adjuvant (ART) and salvage radiotherapy (SRT) are two common concepts to enhance biochemical relapse free survival (BCRFS) in patients with prostate cancer (PC). We analyzed differences in outcome between ART and SRT in patients with steep decline of PSA-levels after surgery to compare outcome. METHODS: We evaluated 253 patients treated with postoperative RT with a median age of 66 years (range 42–85 years) treated between 2004 and 2014. Patients with additive radiotherapy due to PSA persistence and patients in the SRT group, who did not achieve a postoperative PSA level <0.1 ng/mL were excluded. Hence, data of 179 patients was evaluated. We used propensity score matching to build homogenous groups. A Cox regression model was used to determine differences between treatment options. Median follow-up was 32.5 months (range 1.4–128.0 months). RESULTS: Early SRT at PSA levels <0.3 ng/mL was associated with significant longer BCRFS than late SRT (HR: 0.32, 95%-CI: 0.14–0.75, p = 0.009). Multiple Cox regression showed pre-RT PSA level, tumor stage, and Gleason score as predictive factors for biochemical relapse. In the overall group, patients treated with either ART or early SRT showed no significant difference in BCRFS (HR: 0.17, 95%-CI: 0.02–1.44, p = 0.1). In patients with locally advanced PC (pT3/4) BCRFS was similar in both groups as well (HR: 0.21, 95%-CI:0.02–1.79, p = 0.15). CONCLUSION: For patients with PSA-triggered follow-up, close observation is essential and early initiation of local treatment at low PSA levels (<0.3 ng/mL) is beneficial. Our data suggest, that SRT administered at early PSA rise might be equieffective to postoperative ART in patients with locally advanced PC. However, the individual treatment decision must be based on any adverse risk factors and the patients’ postoperative clinical condition. STUDY REGISTRATION: The present work is approved by the Ethics Commission of the Technical University of Munich (TUM) and is registered with the project number 320/14. BioMed Central 2019-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6849377/ /pubmed/31711524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1391-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Vogel, Marco M. E.
Kessel, Kerstin A.
Schiller, Kilian
Devecka, Michal
Gschwend, Jürgen E.
Weichert, Wilko
Wilkens, Jan J.
Combs, Stephanie E.
Adjuvant versus early salvage radiotherapy: outcome of patients with prostate cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy
title Adjuvant versus early salvage radiotherapy: outcome of patients with prostate cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy
title_full Adjuvant versus early salvage radiotherapy: outcome of patients with prostate cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr Adjuvant versus early salvage radiotherapy: outcome of patients with prostate cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Adjuvant versus early salvage radiotherapy: outcome of patients with prostate cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy
title_short Adjuvant versus early salvage radiotherapy: outcome of patients with prostate cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy
title_sort adjuvant versus early salvage radiotherapy: outcome of patients with prostate cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31711524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1391-0
work_keys_str_mv AT vogelmarcome adjuvantversusearlysalvageradiotherapyoutcomeofpatientswithprostatecancertreatedwithpostoperativeradiotherapyafterradicalprostatectomy
AT kesselkerstina adjuvantversusearlysalvageradiotherapyoutcomeofpatientswithprostatecancertreatedwithpostoperativeradiotherapyafterradicalprostatectomy
AT schillerkilian adjuvantversusearlysalvageradiotherapyoutcomeofpatientswithprostatecancertreatedwithpostoperativeradiotherapyafterradicalprostatectomy
AT deveckamichal adjuvantversusearlysalvageradiotherapyoutcomeofpatientswithprostatecancertreatedwithpostoperativeradiotherapyafterradicalprostatectomy
AT gschwendjurgene adjuvantversusearlysalvageradiotherapyoutcomeofpatientswithprostatecancertreatedwithpostoperativeradiotherapyafterradicalprostatectomy
AT weichertwilko adjuvantversusearlysalvageradiotherapyoutcomeofpatientswithprostatecancertreatedwithpostoperativeradiotherapyafterradicalprostatectomy
AT wilkensjanj adjuvantversusearlysalvageradiotherapyoutcomeofpatientswithprostatecancertreatedwithpostoperativeradiotherapyafterradicalprostatectomy
AT combsstephaniee adjuvantversusearlysalvageradiotherapyoutcomeofpatientswithprostatecancertreatedwithpostoperativeradiotherapyafterradicalprostatectomy