Cargando…

The role of radiation‐induced charge imbalance on the dose‐response of a commercial synthetic diamond detector in small field dosimetry

PURPOSE: Discrepancy between experimental and Monte Carlo simulated dose–response of the microDiamond (mD) detector (type 60019, PTW Freiburg, Germany) at small field sizes has been reported. In this work, the radiation‐induced charge imbalance in the structural components of the detector has been i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Looe, Hui Khee, Poppinga, Daniela, Kranzer, Rafael, Büsing, Isabel, Tekin, Tuba, Ulrichs, Ann‐Britt, Delfs, Björn, Vogt, Dennis, Würfel, Jan, Poppe, Björn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30972756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.13542
_version_ 1783469223772684288
author Looe, Hui Khee
Poppinga, Daniela
Kranzer, Rafael
Büsing, Isabel
Tekin, Tuba
Ulrichs, Ann‐Britt
Delfs, Björn
Vogt, Dennis
Würfel, Jan
Poppe, Björn
author_facet Looe, Hui Khee
Poppinga, Daniela
Kranzer, Rafael
Büsing, Isabel
Tekin, Tuba
Ulrichs, Ann‐Britt
Delfs, Björn
Vogt, Dennis
Würfel, Jan
Poppe, Björn
author_sort Looe, Hui Khee
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Discrepancy between experimental and Monte Carlo simulated dose–response of the microDiamond (mD) detector (type 60019, PTW Freiburg, Germany) at small field sizes has been reported. In this work, the radiation‐induced charge imbalance in the structural components of the detector has been investigated as the possible cause of this discrepancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Output ratio (OR) measurements have been performed using standard and modified versions of the mD detector at nominal field sizes from 6 mm × 6 mm to 40 mm × 40 mm. In the first modified mD detector (mD_reversed), the type of charge carriers collected is reversed by connecting the opposite contact to the electrometer. In the second modified mD detector (mD_shortened), the detector's contacts have been shortened. The third modified mD detector (mD_noChip) is the same as the standard version but the diamond chip with the sensitive volume has been removed. Output correction factors were calculated from the measured OR and simulated using the EGSnrc package. An adapted Monte Carlo user‐code has been used to study the underlying mechanisms of the field size‐dependent charge imbalance and to identify the detector's structural components contributing to this effect. RESULTS: At the smallest field size investigated, the OR measured using the standard mD detector is >3% higher than the OR obtained using the modified mD detector with reversed contact (mD_reversed). Combining the results obtained with the different versions of the detector, the OR have been corrected for the effect of radiation imbalance. The OR obtained using the modified mD detector with shortened contacts (mD_shortened) agree with the corrected OR, all showing an over‐response of less than 2% at the field sizes investigated. The discrepancy between the experimental and simulated output correction factors has been eliminated after accounting for the effect of charge imbalance. DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: The role of radiation‐induced charge imbalance on the dose–response of mD detector in small field dosimetry has been studied and quantified. It has been demonstrated that the effect is significant at small field sizes. Multiple methods were used to quantify the effect of charge imbalance with good agreement between Monte Carlo simulations and experimental results obtained with modified detectors. When this correction is applied to the Monte Carlo data, the discrepancy from experimental data is eliminated. Based on the detailed component analysis using an adapted Monte Carlo user‐code, it has been demonstrated that the effect of charge imbalance can be minimized by modifying the design of the detector's contacts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6849526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68495262019-11-15 The role of radiation‐induced charge imbalance on the dose‐response of a commercial synthetic diamond detector in small field dosimetry Looe, Hui Khee Poppinga, Daniela Kranzer, Rafael Büsing, Isabel Tekin, Tuba Ulrichs, Ann‐Britt Delfs, Björn Vogt, Dennis Würfel, Jan Poppe, Björn Med Phys COMPUTATIONAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DOSIMETRY PURPOSE: Discrepancy between experimental and Monte Carlo simulated dose–response of the microDiamond (mD) detector (type 60019, PTW Freiburg, Germany) at small field sizes has been reported. In this work, the radiation‐induced charge imbalance in the structural components of the detector has been investigated as the possible cause of this discrepancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Output ratio (OR) measurements have been performed using standard and modified versions of the mD detector at nominal field sizes from 6 mm × 6 mm to 40 mm × 40 mm. In the first modified mD detector (mD_reversed), the type of charge carriers collected is reversed by connecting the opposite contact to the electrometer. In the second modified mD detector (mD_shortened), the detector's contacts have been shortened. The third modified mD detector (mD_noChip) is the same as the standard version but the diamond chip with the sensitive volume has been removed. Output correction factors were calculated from the measured OR and simulated using the EGSnrc package. An adapted Monte Carlo user‐code has been used to study the underlying mechanisms of the field size‐dependent charge imbalance and to identify the detector's structural components contributing to this effect. RESULTS: At the smallest field size investigated, the OR measured using the standard mD detector is >3% higher than the OR obtained using the modified mD detector with reversed contact (mD_reversed). Combining the results obtained with the different versions of the detector, the OR have been corrected for the effect of radiation imbalance. The OR obtained using the modified mD detector with shortened contacts (mD_shortened) agree with the corrected OR, all showing an over‐response of less than 2% at the field sizes investigated. The discrepancy between the experimental and simulated output correction factors has been eliminated after accounting for the effect of charge imbalance. DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: The role of radiation‐induced charge imbalance on the dose–response of mD detector in small field dosimetry has been studied and quantified. It has been demonstrated that the effect is significant at small field sizes. Multiple methods were used to quantify the effect of charge imbalance with good agreement between Monte Carlo simulations and experimental results obtained with modified detectors. When this correction is applied to the Monte Carlo data, the discrepancy from experimental data is eliminated. Based on the detailed component analysis using an adapted Monte Carlo user‐code, it has been demonstrated that the effect of charge imbalance can be minimized by modifying the design of the detector's contacts. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-02 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6849526/ /pubmed/30972756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.13542 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle COMPUTATIONAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DOSIMETRY
Looe, Hui Khee
Poppinga, Daniela
Kranzer, Rafael
Büsing, Isabel
Tekin, Tuba
Ulrichs, Ann‐Britt
Delfs, Björn
Vogt, Dennis
Würfel, Jan
Poppe, Björn
The role of radiation‐induced charge imbalance on the dose‐response of a commercial synthetic diamond detector in small field dosimetry
title The role of radiation‐induced charge imbalance on the dose‐response of a commercial synthetic diamond detector in small field dosimetry
title_full The role of radiation‐induced charge imbalance on the dose‐response of a commercial synthetic diamond detector in small field dosimetry
title_fullStr The role of radiation‐induced charge imbalance on the dose‐response of a commercial synthetic diamond detector in small field dosimetry
title_full_unstemmed The role of radiation‐induced charge imbalance on the dose‐response of a commercial synthetic diamond detector in small field dosimetry
title_short The role of radiation‐induced charge imbalance on the dose‐response of a commercial synthetic diamond detector in small field dosimetry
title_sort role of radiation‐induced charge imbalance on the dose‐response of a commercial synthetic diamond detector in small field dosimetry
topic COMPUTATIONAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DOSIMETRY
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30972756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.13542
work_keys_str_mv AT looehuikhee theroleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry
AT poppingadaniela theroleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry
AT kranzerrafael theroleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry
AT busingisabel theroleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry
AT tekintuba theroleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry
AT ulrichsannbritt theroleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry
AT delfsbjorn theroleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry
AT vogtdennis theroleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry
AT wurfeljan theroleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry
AT poppebjorn theroleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry
AT looehuikhee roleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry
AT poppingadaniela roleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry
AT kranzerrafael roleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry
AT busingisabel roleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry
AT tekintuba roleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry
AT ulrichsannbritt roleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry
AT delfsbjorn roleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry
AT vogtdennis roleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry
AT wurfeljan roleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry
AT poppebjorn roleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry