Cargando…
The role of radiation‐induced charge imbalance on the dose‐response of a commercial synthetic diamond detector in small field dosimetry
PURPOSE: Discrepancy between experimental and Monte Carlo simulated dose–response of the microDiamond (mD) detector (type 60019, PTW Freiburg, Germany) at small field sizes has been reported. In this work, the radiation‐induced charge imbalance in the structural components of the detector has been i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30972756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.13542 |
_version_ | 1783469223772684288 |
---|---|
author | Looe, Hui Khee Poppinga, Daniela Kranzer, Rafael Büsing, Isabel Tekin, Tuba Ulrichs, Ann‐Britt Delfs, Björn Vogt, Dennis Würfel, Jan Poppe, Björn |
author_facet | Looe, Hui Khee Poppinga, Daniela Kranzer, Rafael Büsing, Isabel Tekin, Tuba Ulrichs, Ann‐Britt Delfs, Björn Vogt, Dennis Würfel, Jan Poppe, Björn |
author_sort | Looe, Hui Khee |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Discrepancy between experimental and Monte Carlo simulated dose–response of the microDiamond (mD) detector (type 60019, PTW Freiburg, Germany) at small field sizes has been reported. In this work, the radiation‐induced charge imbalance in the structural components of the detector has been investigated as the possible cause of this discrepancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Output ratio (OR) measurements have been performed using standard and modified versions of the mD detector at nominal field sizes from 6 mm × 6 mm to 40 mm × 40 mm. In the first modified mD detector (mD_reversed), the type of charge carriers collected is reversed by connecting the opposite contact to the electrometer. In the second modified mD detector (mD_shortened), the detector's contacts have been shortened. The third modified mD detector (mD_noChip) is the same as the standard version but the diamond chip with the sensitive volume has been removed. Output correction factors were calculated from the measured OR and simulated using the EGSnrc package. An adapted Monte Carlo user‐code has been used to study the underlying mechanisms of the field size‐dependent charge imbalance and to identify the detector's structural components contributing to this effect. RESULTS: At the smallest field size investigated, the OR measured using the standard mD detector is >3% higher than the OR obtained using the modified mD detector with reversed contact (mD_reversed). Combining the results obtained with the different versions of the detector, the OR have been corrected for the effect of radiation imbalance. The OR obtained using the modified mD detector with shortened contacts (mD_shortened) agree with the corrected OR, all showing an over‐response of less than 2% at the field sizes investigated. The discrepancy between the experimental and simulated output correction factors has been eliminated after accounting for the effect of charge imbalance. DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: The role of radiation‐induced charge imbalance on the dose–response of mD detector in small field dosimetry has been studied and quantified. It has been demonstrated that the effect is significant at small field sizes. Multiple methods were used to quantify the effect of charge imbalance with good agreement between Monte Carlo simulations and experimental results obtained with modified detectors. When this correction is applied to the Monte Carlo data, the discrepancy from experimental data is eliminated. Based on the detailed component analysis using an adapted Monte Carlo user‐code, it has been demonstrated that the effect of charge imbalance can be minimized by modifying the design of the detector's contacts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6849526 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68495262019-11-15 The role of radiation‐induced charge imbalance on the dose‐response of a commercial synthetic diamond detector in small field dosimetry Looe, Hui Khee Poppinga, Daniela Kranzer, Rafael Büsing, Isabel Tekin, Tuba Ulrichs, Ann‐Britt Delfs, Björn Vogt, Dennis Würfel, Jan Poppe, Björn Med Phys COMPUTATIONAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DOSIMETRY PURPOSE: Discrepancy between experimental and Monte Carlo simulated dose–response of the microDiamond (mD) detector (type 60019, PTW Freiburg, Germany) at small field sizes has been reported. In this work, the radiation‐induced charge imbalance in the structural components of the detector has been investigated as the possible cause of this discrepancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Output ratio (OR) measurements have been performed using standard and modified versions of the mD detector at nominal field sizes from 6 mm × 6 mm to 40 mm × 40 mm. In the first modified mD detector (mD_reversed), the type of charge carriers collected is reversed by connecting the opposite contact to the electrometer. In the second modified mD detector (mD_shortened), the detector's contacts have been shortened. The third modified mD detector (mD_noChip) is the same as the standard version but the diamond chip with the sensitive volume has been removed. Output correction factors were calculated from the measured OR and simulated using the EGSnrc package. An adapted Monte Carlo user‐code has been used to study the underlying mechanisms of the field size‐dependent charge imbalance and to identify the detector's structural components contributing to this effect. RESULTS: At the smallest field size investigated, the OR measured using the standard mD detector is >3% higher than the OR obtained using the modified mD detector with reversed contact (mD_reversed). Combining the results obtained with the different versions of the detector, the OR have been corrected for the effect of radiation imbalance. The OR obtained using the modified mD detector with shortened contacts (mD_shortened) agree with the corrected OR, all showing an over‐response of less than 2% at the field sizes investigated. The discrepancy between the experimental and simulated output correction factors has been eliminated after accounting for the effect of charge imbalance. DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: The role of radiation‐induced charge imbalance on the dose–response of mD detector in small field dosimetry has been studied and quantified. It has been demonstrated that the effect is significant at small field sizes. Multiple methods were used to quantify the effect of charge imbalance with good agreement between Monte Carlo simulations and experimental results obtained with modified detectors. When this correction is applied to the Monte Carlo data, the discrepancy from experimental data is eliminated. Based on the detailed component analysis using an adapted Monte Carlo user‐code, it has been demonstrated that the effect of charge imbalance can be minimized by modifying the design of the detector's contacts. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-02 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6849526/ /pubmed/30972756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.13542 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | COMPUTATIONAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DOSIMETRY Looe, Hui Khee Poppinga, Daniela Kranzer, Rafael Büsing, Isabel Tekin, Tuba Ulrichs, Ann‐Britt Delfs, Björn Vogt, Dennis Würfel, Jan Poppe, Björn The role of radiation‐induced charge imbalance on the dose‐response of a commercial synthetic diamond detector in small field dosimetry |
title | The role of radiation‐induced charge imbalance on the dose‐response of a commercial synthetic diamond detector in small field dosimetry |
title_full | The role of radiation‐induced charge imbalance on the dose‐response of a commercial synthetic diamond detector in small field dosimetry |
title_fullStr | The role of radiation‐induced charge imbalance on the dose‐response of a commercial synthetic diamond detector in small field dosimetry |
title_full_unstemmed | The role of radiation‐induced charge imbalance on the dose‐response of a commercial synthetic diamond detector in small field dosimetry |
title_short | The role of radiation‐induced charge imbalance on the dose‐response of a commercial synthetic diamond detector in small field dosimetry |
title_sort | role of radiation‐induced charge imbalance on the dose‐response of a commercial synthetic diamond detector in small field dosimetry |
topic | COMPUTATIONAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DOSIMETRY |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30972756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.13542 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT looehuikhee theroleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry AT poppingadaniela theroleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry AT kranzerrafael theroleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry AT busingisabel theroleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry AT tekintuba theroleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry AT ulrichsannbritt theroleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry AT delfsbjorn theroleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry AT vogtdennis theroleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry AT wurfeljan theroleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry AT poppebjorn theroleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry AT looehuikhee roleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry AT poppingadaniela roleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry AT kranzerrafael roleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry AT busingisabel roleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry AT tekintuba roleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry AT ulrichsannbritt roleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry AT delfsbjorn roleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry AT vogtdennis roleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry AT wurfeljan roleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry AT poppebjorn roleofradiationinducedchargeimbalanceonthedoseresponseofacommercialsyntheticdiamonddetectorinsmallfielddosimetry |