Cargando…

A Comparison of Thresholding Methods for Forensic Reconstruction Studies Using Fluorescent Powder Proxies for Trace Materials

Image segmentation is a fundamental precursor to quantitative image analysis. At present, no standardised methodology exists for segmenting images of fluorescent proxies for trace evidence. Experiments evaluated (i) whether manual segmentation is reproducible within and between examiners (with three...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levin, Emma A., Morgan, Ruth M., Griffin, Lewis D., Jones, Vivienne J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30359482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13938
_version_ 1783469234719817728
author Levin, Emma A.
Morgan, Ruth M.
Griffin, Lewis D.
Jones, Vivienne J.
author_facet Levin, Emma A.
Morgan, Ruth M.
Griffin, Lewis D.
Jones, Vivienne J.
author_sort Levin, Emma A.
collection PubMed
description Image segmentation is a fundamental precursor to quantitative image analysis. At present, no standardised methodology exists for segmenting images of fluorescent proxies for trace evidence. Experiments evaluated (i) whether manual segmentation is reproducible within and between examiners (with three participants repeatedly tracing three images) (ii) whether manually defining a threshold level offers accurate and reproducible results (with 20 examiners segmenting 10 images), and (iii) whether a global thresholding algorithm might perform with similar accuracy, while offering improved reproducibility and efficiency (16 algorithms tested). Statistically significant differences were seen between examiners’ traced outputs. Manually thresholding produced good accuracy on average (within ±1% of the expected values), but poor reproducibility (with multiple outliers). Three algorithms (Yen, MaxEntropy, and RenyiEntropy) offered similar accuracy, with improved reproducibility and efficiency. Together, these findings suggest that appropriate algorithms could perform thresholding tasks as part of a robust workflow for reconstruction studies employing fluorescent proxies for trace evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6849572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68495722019-11-15 A Comparison of Thresholding Methods for Forensic Reconstruction Studies Using Fluorescent Powder Proxies for Trace Materials Levin, Emma A. Morgan, Ruth M. Griffin, Lewis D. Jones, Vivienne J. J Forensic Sci General Image segmentation is a fundamental precursor to quantitative image analysis. At present, no standardised methodology exists for segmenting images of fluorescent proxies for trace evidence. Experiments evaluated (i) whether manual segmentation is reproducible within and between examiners (with three participants repeatedly tracing three images) (ii) whether manually defining a threshold level offers accurate and reproducible results (with 20 examiners segmenting 10 images), and (iii) whether a global thresholding algorithm might perform with similar accuracy, while offering improved reproducibility and efficiency (16 algorithms tested). Statistically significant differences were seen between examiners’ traced outputs. Manually thresholding produced good accuracy on average (within ±1% of the expected values), but poor reproducibility (with multiple outliers). Three algorithms (Yen, MaxEntropy, and RenyiEntropy) offered similar accuracy, with improved reproducibility and efficiency. Together, these findings suggest that appropriate algorithms could perform thresholding tasks as part of a robust workflow for reconstruction studies employing fluorescent proxies for trace evidence. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-25 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6849572/ /pubmed/30359482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13938 Text en © 2018 The Authors Journal of Forensic Sciences published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Academy of Forensic Sciences This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle General
Levin, Emma A.
Morgan, Ruth M.
Griffin, Lewis D.
Jones, Vivienne J.
A Comparison of Thresholding Methods for Forensic Reconstruction Studies Using Fluorescent Powder Proxies for Trace Materials
title A Comparison of Thresholding Methods for Forensic Reconstruction Studies Using Fluorescent Powder Proxies for Trace Materials
title_full A Comparison of Thresholding Methods for Forensic Reconstruction Studies Using Fluorescent Powder Proxies for Trace Materials
title_fullStr A Comparison of Thresholding Methods for Forensic Reconstruction Studies Using Fluorescent Powder Proxies for Trace Materials
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Thresholding Methods for Forensic Reconstruction Studies Using Fluorescent Powder Proxies for Trace Materials
title_short A Comparison of Thresholding Methods for Forensic Reconstruction Studies Using Fluorescent Powder Proxies for Trace Materials
title_sort comparison of thresholding methods for forensic reconstruction studies using fluorescent powder proxies for trace materials
topic General
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30359482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13938
work_keys_str_mv AT levinemmaa acomparisonofthresholdingmethodsforforensicreconstructionstudiesusingfluorescentpowderproxiesfortracematerials
AT morganruthm acomparisonofthresholdingmethodsforforensicreconstructionstudiesusingfluorescentpowderproxiesfortracematerials
AT griffinlewisd acomparisonofthresholdingmethodsforforensicreconstructionstudiesusingfluorescentpowderproxiesfortracematerials
AT jonesviviennej acomparisonofthresholdingmethodsforforensicreconstructionstudiesusingfluorescentpowderproxiesfortracematerials
AT levinemmaa comparisonofthresholdingmethodsforforensicreconstructionstudiesusingfluorescentpowderproxiesfortracematerials
AT morganruthm comparisonofthresholdingmethodsforforensicreconstructionstudiesusingfluorescentpowderproxiesfortracematerials
AT griffinlewisd comparisonofthresholdingmethodsforforensicreconstructionstudiesusingfluorescentpowderproxiesfortracematerials
AT jonesviviennej comparisonofthresholdingmethodsforforensicreconstructionstudiesusingfluorescentpowderproxiesfortracematerials