Cargando…

Good parenting may not increase reproductive success under environmental extremes

For species exhibiting parental care, the way in which parents adjust care behaviour to compensate for environmental change potentially influences offspring survival and, ultimately, population viability. Using the three‐spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) – a species in which males provide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fox, Rebecca J., Head, Megan L., Barber, Iain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30063102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13358
_version_ 1783469239572627456
author Fox, Rebecca J.
Head, Megan L.
Barber, Iain
author_facet Fox, Rebecca J.
Head, Megan L.
Barber, Iain
author_sort Fox, Rebecca J.
collection PubMed
description For species exhibiting parental care, the way in which parents adjust care behaviour to compensate for environmental change potentially influences offspring survival and, ultimately, population viability. Using the three‐spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) – a species in which males provide parental care by building and tending a nest and fanning the eggs – we examined how low dissolved oxygen (DO) levels affect paternal care, embryo development and survival. Although levels of nest tending were unaffected by DO level, we found that larger males fanned their embryos more under low oxygen conditions. This resulted in faster rates of embryo development within the clutches of these larger males, but reduced embryo survival at 7 days post‐fertilization compared to clutches of smaller males. Our results suggest that although parents may attempt to compensate for environmental change via alterations to care behaviour, their ability to do so can be dependent on parental phenotype. This sets up the potential for oxygen levels to act on the strength and direction of selection within populations. We discuss possible explanations for the surprising result that supposedly adaptive changes in care behaviour by large males (i.e. increased fanning) led to reduced embryo survival at 7 days post‐fertilization, and whether, as a consequence, acute environmental conditions may have the potential to overwhelm selection on sexual traits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6849592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68495922019-11-15 Good parenting may not increase reproductive success under environmental extremes Fox, Rebecca J. Head, Megan L. Barber, Iain J Evol Biol Research Papers For species exhibiting parental care, the way in which parents adjust care behaviour to compensate for environmental change potentially influences offspring survival and, ultimately, population viability. Using the three‐spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) – a species in which males provide parental care by building and tending a nest and fanning the eggs – we examined how low dissolved oxygen (DO) levels affect paternal care, embryo development and survival. Although levels of nest tending were unaffected by DO level, we found that larger males fanned their embryos more under low oxygen conditions. This resulted in faster rates of embryo development within the clutches of these larger males, but reduced embryo survival at 7 days post‐fertilization compared to clutches of smaller males. Our results suggest that although parents may attempt to compensate for environmental change via alterations to care behaviour, their ability to do so can be dependent on parental phenotype. This sets up the potential for oxygen levels to act on the strength and direction of selection within populations. We discuss possible explanations for the surprising result that supposedly adaptive changes in care behaviour by large males (i.e. increased fanning) led to reduced embryo survival at 7 days post‐fertilization, and whether, as a consequence, acute environmental conditions may have the potential to overwhelm selection on sexual traits. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-19 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6849592/ /pubmed/30063102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13358 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Evolutionary Biology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Fox, Rebecca J.
Head, Megan L.
Barber, Iain
Good parenting may not increase reproductive success under environmental extremes
title Good parenting may not increase reproductive success under environmental extremes
title_full Good parenting may not increase reproductive success under environmental extremes
title_fullStr Good parenting may not increase reproductive success under environmental extremes
title_full_unstemmed Good parenting may not increase reproductive success under environmental extremes
title_short Good parenting may not increase reproductive success under environmental extremes
title_sort good parenting may not increase reproductive success under environmental extremes
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30063102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13358
work_keys_str_mv AT foxrebeccaj goodparentingmaynotincreasereproductivesuccessunderenvironmentalextremes
AT headmeganl goodparentingmaynotincreasereproductivesuccessunderenvironmentalextremes
AT barberiain goodparentingmaynotincreasereproductivesuccessunderenvironmentalextremes