Cargando…

Quantification of forward scattering based on the analysis of double‐pass images in the frequency domain

PURPOSE: To assess forward intraocular scattering by means of a new parameter (Frequency Scatter Index, FSI(3)) based on the analysing double‐pass retinal images in the frequency domain, which minimizes the impact of aberrations on the results. METHODS: A prospective observational study was carried...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martínez‐Roda, Joan A., García‐Guerra, Carlos E., Diaz‐Doutón, Fernando, Pujol, Jaume, Salvador, Antoni, Vilaseca, Meritxell
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31050166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.14122
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To assess forward intraocular scattering by means of a new parameter (Frequency Scatter Index, FSI(3)) based on the analysing double‐pass retinal images in the frequency domain, which minimizes the impact of aberrations on the results. METHODS: A prospective observational study was carried out in the Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa (Spain) on a group of 19 patients diagnosed with nuclear cataracts of various LOCSIII grades and a control group (CG) with nine healthy eyes. We recorded double‐pass retinal images with a custom set‐up based on a high‐sensitivity digital camera. The FSI(3) was then computed using spatial frequencies below three cycles per degree. A preliminary validation of the FSI(3) was performed on an artificial eye and two eyes of volunteers with and without commercial diffusers, and under defocus. RESULTS: The FSI(3) was hardly affected by defocus values up to 2.50 D. The mean (and standard deviation) FSI(3) values were as follows: for the CG, 1.19 (0.21); and for LOCSIII grades nuclear opacity 1, 2 and 3, 1.30 (0.12), 1.62 (0.21) and 1.85 (0.21), respectively. Eyes with cataracts showed FSI(3) values significantly different than healthy eyes (p = 0.001). A good correlation (ρ = 0.861, p < 0.001) was found between the FSI(3) and objective scatter index provided by a commercial instrument. CONCLUSION: Since aberrations have little impact on the FSI(3), the light scatter assessment becomes less dependent on the patient's refractive error compensation and the presence of higher‐order aberrations. The FSI(3) can further the clinical and scientific understanding of forward intraocular scattering.