Cargando…
Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between the wild and captive Tibetan wild ass (Equus kiang)
AIMS: The gut microbiota has a great effect on the health and nutrition of the host. Manipulation of the intestinal microbiota may improve animal health and growth performance. The objectives of our study were to characterize the faecal microbiota between wild and captive Tibetan wild asses and disc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849810/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30825354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.14240 |
_version_ | 1783469283811000320 |
---|---|
author | Gao, H. Chi, X. Qin, W. Wang, L. Song, P. Cai, Z. Zhang, J. Zhang, T. |
author_facet | Gao, H. Chi, X. Qin, W. Wang, L. Song, P. Cai, Z. Zhang, J. Zhang, T. |
author_sort | Gao, H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: The gut microbiota has a great effect on the health and nutrition of the host. Manipulation of the intestinal microbiota may improve animal health and growth performance. The objectives of our study were to characterize the faecal microbiota between wild and captive Tibetan wild asses and discuss the differences and their reasons. METHODS AND RESULTS: Through high‐throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA V4‐V5 region, we studied the gut microbiota composition and structure of Tibetan wild asses in winter, and analysed the differences between wild and captive groups. The results showed that the most common bacterial phylum in Tibetan wild ass faeces samples was Bacteroidetes, while the phylum Firmicutes was dominant in captive Tibetan wild ass faecal samples. The relative abundance of Firmicutes, Tenericutes and Spirochaetes were significantly higher (P < 0·01) than in the wild groups. CONCLUSIONS: Captivity reduces intestinal microbial diversity, evenness and operational taxonomic unit number due to the consumption of industrial food, therefore, increasing the risk of disease prevalence and affecting the health of wildlife. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: We studied the effect of the captive environment on intestinal micro‐organisms. This article provides a theoretical basis for the ex‐situ conservation of wild animals in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6849810 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68498102019-11-15 Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between the wild and captive Tibetan wild ass (Equus kiang) Gao, H. Chi, X. Qin, W. Wang, L. Song, P. Cai, Z. Zhang, J. Zhang, T. J Appl Microbiol Original Articles AIMS: The gut microbiota has a great effect on the health and nutrition of the host. Manipulation of the intestinal microbiota may improve animal health and growth performance. The objectives of our study were to characterize the faecal microbiota between wild and captive Tibetan wild asses and discuss the differences and their reasons. METHODS AND RESULTS: Through high‐throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA V4‐V5 region, we studied the gut microbiota composition and structure of Tibetan wild asses in winter, and analysed the differences between wild and captive groups. The results showed that the most common bacterial phylum in Tibetan wild ass faeces samples was Bacteroidetes, while the phylum Firmicutes was dominant in captive Tibetan wild ass faecal samples. The relative abundance of Firmicutes, Tenericutes and Spirochaetes were significantly higher (P < 0·01) than in the wild groups. CONCLUSIONS: Captivity reduces intestinal microbial diversity, evenness and operational taxonomic unit number due to the consumption of industrial food, therefore, increasing the risk of disease prevalence and affecting the health of wildlife. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: We studied the effect of the captive environment on intestinal micro‐organisms. This article provides a theoretical basis for the ex‐situ conservation of wild animals in the future. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-03 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6849810/ /pubmed/30825354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.14240 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Microbiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for Applied Microbiology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Gao, H. Chi, X. Qin, W. Wang, L. Song, P. Cai, Z. Zhang, J. Zhang, T. Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between the wild and captive Tibetan wild ass (Equus kiang) |
title | Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between the wild and captive Tibetan wild ass (Equus kiang) |
title_full | Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between the wild and captive Tibetan wild ass (Equus kiang) |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between the wild and captive Tibetan wild ass (Equus kiang) |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between the wild and captive Tibetan wild ass (Equus kiang) |
title_short | Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between the wild and captive Tibetan wild ass (Equus kiang) |
title_sort | comparison of the gut microbiota composition between the wild and captive tibetan wild ass (equus kiang) |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849810/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30825354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.14240 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gaoh comparisonofthegutmicrobiotacompositionbetweenthewildandcaptivetibetanwildassequuskiang AT chix comparisonofthegutmicrobiotacompositionbetweenthewildandcaptivetibetanwildassequuskiang AT qinw comparisonofthegutmicrobiotacompositionbetweenthewildandcaptivetibetanwildassequuskiang AT wangl comparisonofthegutmicrobiotacompositionbetweenthewildandcaptivetibetanwildassequuskiang AT songp comparisonofthegutmicrobiotacompositionbetweenthewildandcaptivetibetanwildassequuskiang AT caiz comparisonofthegutmicrobiotacompositionbetweenthewildandcaptivetibetanwildassequuskiang AT zhangj comparisonofthegutmicrobiotacompositionbetweenthewildandcaptivetibetanwildassequuskiang AT zhangt comparisonofthegutmicrobiotacompositionbetweenthewildandcaptivetibetanwildassequuskiang |