Cargando…

Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between the wild and captive Tibetan wild ass (Equus kiang)

AIMS: The gut microbiota has a great effect on the health and nutrition of the host. Manipulation of the intestinal microbiota may improve animal health and growth performance. The objectives of our study were to characterize the faecal microbiota between wild and captive Tibetan wild asses and disc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, H., Chi, X., Qin, W., Wang, L., Song, P., Cai, Z., Zhang, J., Zhang, T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30825354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.14240
_version_ 1783469283811000320
author Gao, H.
Chi, X.
Qin, W.
Wang, L.
Song, P.
Cai, Z.
Zhang, J.
Zhang, T.
author_facet Gao, H.
Chi, X.
Qin, W.
Wang, L.
Song, P.
Cai, Z.
Zhang, J.
Zhang, T.
author_sort Gao, H.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The gut microbiota has a great effect on the health and nutrition of the host. Manipulation of the intestinal microbiota may improve animal health and growth performance. The objectives of our study were to characterize the faecal microbiota between wild and captive Tibetan wild asses and discuss the differences and their reasons. METHODS AND RESULTS: Through high‐throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA V4‐V5 region, we studied the gut microbiota composition and structure of Tibetan wild asses in winter, and analysed the differences between wild and captive groups. The results showed that the most common bacterial phylum in Tibetan wild ass faeces samples was Bacteroidetes, while the phylum Firmicutes was dominant in captive Tibetan wild ass faecal samples. The relative abundance of Firmicutes, Tenericutes and Spirochaetes were significantly higher (P < 0·01) than in the wild groups. CONCLUSIONS: Captivity reduces intestinal microbial diversity, evenness and operational taxonomic unit number due to the consumption of industrial food, therefore, increasing the risk of disease prevalence and affecting the health of wildlife. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: We studied the effect of the captive environment on intestinal micro‐organisms. This article provides a theoretical basis for the ex‐situ conservation of wild animals in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6849810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68498102019-11-15 Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between the wild and captive Tibetan wild ass (Equus kiang) Gao, H. Chi, X. Qin, W. Wang, L. Song, P. Cai, Z. Zhang, J. Zhang, T. J Appl Microbiol Original Articles AIMS: The gut microbiota has a great effect on the health and nutrition of the host. Manipulation of the intestinal microbiota may improve animal health and growth performance. The objectives of our study were to characterize the faecal microbiota between wild and captive Tibetan wild asses and discuss the differences and their reasons. METHODS AND RESULTS: Through high‐throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA V4‐V5 region, we studied the gut microbiota composition and structure of Tibetan wild asses in winter, and analysed the differences between wild and captive groups. The results showed that the most common bacterial phylum in Tibetan wild ass faeces samples was Bacteroidetes, while the phylum Firmicutes was dominant in captive Tibetan wild ass faecal samples. The relative abundance of Firmicutes, Tenericutes and Spirochaetes were significantly higher (P < 0·01) than in the wild groups. CONCLUSIONS: Captivity reduces intestinal microbial diversity, evenness and operational taxonomic unit number due to the consumption of industrial food, therefore, increasing the risk of disease prevalence and affecting the health of wildlife. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: We studied the effect of the captive environment on intestinal micro‐organisms. This article provides a theoretical basis for the ex‐situ conservation of wild animals in the future. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-03 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6849810/ /pubmed/30825354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.14240 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Microbiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for Applied Microbiology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Gao, H.
Chi, X.
Qin, W.
Wang, L.
Song, P.
Cai, Z.
Zhang, J.
Zhang, T.
Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between the wild and captive Tibetan wild ass (Equus kiang)
title Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between the wild and captive Tibetan wild ass (Equus kiang)
title_full Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between the wild and captive Tibetan wild ass (Equus kiang)
title_fullStr Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between the wild and captive Tibetan wild ass (Equus kiang)
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between the wild and captive Tibetan wild ass (Equus kiang)
title_short Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between the wild and captive Tibetan wild ass (Equus kiang)
title_sort comparison of the gut microbiota composition between the wild and captive tibetan wild ass (equus kiang)
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30825354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.14240
work_keys_str_mv AT gaoh comparisonofthegutmicrobiotacompositionbetweenthewildandcaptivetibetanwildassequuskiang
AT chix comparisonofthegutmicrobiotacompositionbetweenthewildandcaptivetibetanwildassequuskiang
AT qinw comparisonofthegutmicrobiotacompositionbetweenthewildandcaptivetibetanwildassequuskiang
AT wangl comparisonofthegutmicrobiotacompositionbetweenthewildandcaptivetibetanwildassequuskiang
AT songp comparisonofthegutmicrobiotacompositionbetweenthewildandcaptivetibetanwildassequuskiang
AT caiz comparisonofthegutmicrobiotacompositionbetweenthewildandcaptivetibetanwildassequuskiang
AT zhangj comparisonofthegutmicrobiotacompositionbetweenthewildandcaptivetibetanwildassequuskiang
AT zhangt comparisonofthegutmicrobiotacompositionbetweenthewildandcaptivetibetanwildassequuskiang