Cargando…

Organic amendment additions to rangelands: A meta‐analysis of multiple ecosystem outcomes

Interest in land application of organic amendments—such as biosolids, composts, and manures—is growing due to their potential to increase soil carbon and help mitigate climate change, as well as to support soil health and regenerative agriculture. While organic amendments are predominantly applied t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gravuer, Kelly, Gennet, Sasha, Throop, Heather L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30604474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14535
_version_ 1783469286238453760
author Gravuer, Kelly
Gennet, Sasha
Throop, Heather L.
author_facet Gravuer, Kelly
Gennet, Sasha
Throop, Heather L.
author_sort Gravuer, Kelly
collection PubMed
description Interest in land application of organic amendments—such as biosolids, composts, and manures—is growing due to their potential to increase soil carbon and help mitigate climate change, as well as to support soil health and regenerative agriculture. While organic amendments are predominantly applied to croplands, their application is increasingly proposed on relatively arid rangelands that do not typically receive fertilizers or other inputs, creating unique concerns for outcomes such as native plant diversity and water quality. To maximize environmental benefits and minimize potential harms, we must understand how soil, water, and plant communities respond to particular amendments and site conditions. We conducted a global meta‐analysis of 92 studies in which organic amendments had been added to arid, semiarid, or Mediterranean rangelands. We found that organic amendments, on average, provide some environmental benefits (increased soil carbon, soil water holding capacity, aboveground net primary productivity, and plant tissue nitrogen; decreased runoff quantity), as well as some environmental harms (increased concentrations of soil lead, runoff nitrate, and runoff phosphorus; increased soil CO(2) emissions). Published data were inadequate to fully assess impacts to native plant communities. In our models, adding higher amounts of amendment benefitted four outcomes and harmed two outcomes, whereas adding amendments with higher nitrogen concentrations benefitted two outcomes and harmed four outcomes. This suggests that trade‐offs among outcomes are inevitable; however, applying low‐N amendments was consistent with both maximizing benefits and minimizing harms. Short study time frames (median 1–2 years), limited geographic scope, and, for some outcomes, few published studies limit longer‐term inferences from these models. Nevertheless, they provide a starting point to develop site‐specific amendment application strategies aimed toward realizing the potential of this practice to contribute to climate change mitigation while minimizing negative impacts on other environmental goals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6849820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68498202019-11-15 Organic amendment additions to rangelands: A meta‐analysis of multiple ecosystem outcomes Gravuer, Kelly Gennet, Sasha Throop, Heather L. Glob Chang Biol Primary Research Articles Interest in land application of organic amendments—such as biosolids, composts, and manures—is growing due to their potential to increase soil carbon and help mitigate climate change, as well as to support soil health and regenerative agriculture. While organic amendments are predominantly applied to croplands, their application is increasingly proposed on relatively arid rangelands that do not typically receive fertilizers or other inputs, creating unique concerns for outcomes such as native plant diversity and water quality. To maximize environmental benefits and minimize potential harms, we must understand how soil, water, and plant communities respond to particular amendments and site conditions. We conducted a global meta‐analysis of 92 studies in which organic amendments had been added to arid, semiarid, or Mediterranean rangelands. We found that organic amendments, on average, provide some environmental benefits (increased soil carbon, soil water holding capacity, aboveground net primary productivity, and plant tissue nitrogen; decreased runoff quantity), as well as some environmental harms (increased concentrations of soil lead, runoff nitrate, and runoff phosphorus; increased soil CO(2) emissions). Published data were inadequate to fully assess impacts to native plant communities. In our models, adding higher amounts of amendment benefitted four outcomes and harmed two outcomes, whereas adding amendments with higher nitrogen concentrations benefitted two outcomes and harmed four outcomes. This suggests that trade‐offs among outcomes are inevitable; however, applying low‐N amendments was consistent with both maximizing benefits and minimizing harms. Short study time frames (median 1–2 years), limited geographic scope, and, for some outcomes, few published studies limit longer‐term inferences from these models. Nevertheless, they provide a starting point to develop site‐specific amendment application strategies aimed toward realizing the potential of this practice to contribute to climate change mitigation while minimizing negative impacts on other environmental goals. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-02 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6849820/ /pubmed/30604474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14535 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Primary Research Articles
Gravuer, Kelly
Gennet, Sasha
Throop, Heather L.
Organic amendment additions to rangelands: A meta‐analysis of multiple ecosystem outcomes
title Organic amendment additions to rangelands: A meta‐analysis of multiple ecosystem outcomes
title_full Organic amendment additions to rangelands: A meta‐analysis of multiple ecosystem outcomes
title_fullStr Organic amendment additions to rangelands: A meta‐analysis of multiple ecosystem outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Organic amendment additions to rangelands: A meta‐analysis of multiple ecosystem outcomes
title_short Organic amendment additions to rangelands: A meta‐analysis of multiple ecosystem outcomes
title_sort organic amendment additions to rangelands: a meta‐analysis of multiple ecosystem outcomes
topic Primary Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30604474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14535
work_keys_str_mv AT gravuerkelly organicamendmentadditionstorangelandsametaanalysisofmultipleecosystemoutcomes
AT gennetsasha organicamendmentadditionstorangelandsametaanalysisofmultipleecosystemoutcomes
AT throopheatherl organicamendmentadditionstorangelandsametaanalysisofmultipleecosystemoutcomes