Cargando…
Comparing outcomes: The Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation from an international point of view
OBJECTIVES: The Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation–Outcome Measure (CORE‐OM) is a freely accessible self‐assessment questionnaire with a total of 34 items measuring the progress of psychological or psychotherapeutic treatments according to four scales (well‐being, problems, functioning, and risk...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30779267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1774 |
_version_ | 1783469287888912384 |
---|---|
author | Zeldovich, Marina Alexandrowicz, Rainer W. |
author_facet | Zeldovich, Marina Alexandrowicz, Rainer W. |
author_sort | Zeldovich, Marina |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation–Outcome Measure (CORE‐OM) is a freely accessible self‐assessment questionnaire with a total of 34 items measuring the progress of psychological or psychotherapeutic treatments according to four scales (well‐being, problems, functioning, and risk). The CORE‐OM originated in the United Kingdom and has been translated into 54 languages and dialects. The aim of this study is to systematically compare the translated versions. METHOD: A total of 21 translations were compared using methods of systematic review and meta‐analysis. RESULTS: The results show a certain heterogeneity between the studies; however, the 21 translations can be declared as equivalent. CONCLUSION: The factorial structure could not be replicated in any of translations. Therefore, further analysis of the CORE‐OM domains is recommended. In addition, some supplementary restrictions on the translation process, data collection, and reporting of results are necessary to ensure comparability and quality of CORE‐OM translations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6849827 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68498272019-11-15 Comparing outcomes: The Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation from an international point of view Zeldovich, Marina Alexandrowicz, Rainer W. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Original Articles OBJECTIVES: The Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation–Outcome Measure (CORE‐OM) is a freely accessible self‐assessment questionnaire with a total of 34 items measuring the progress of psychological or psychotherapeutic treatments according to four scales (well‐being, problems, functioning, and risk). The CORE‐OM originated in the United Kingdom and has been translated into 54 languages and dialects. The aim of this study is to systematically compare the translated versions. METHOD: A total of 21 translations were compared using methods of systematic review and meta‐analysis. RESULTS: The results show a certain heterogeneity between the studies; however, the 21 translations can be declared as equivalent. CONCLUSION: The factorial structure could not be replicated in any of translations. Therefore, further analysis of the CORE‐OM domains is recommended. In addition, some supplementary restrictions on the translation process, data collection, and reporting of results are necessary to ensure comparability and quality of CORE‐OM translations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6849827/ /pubmed/30779267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1774 Text en © 2019 The Authors International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Zeldovich, Marina Alexandrowicz, Rainer W. Comparing outcomes: The Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation from an international point of view |
title | Comparing outcomes: The Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation from an international point of view |
title_full | Comparing outcomes: The Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation from an international point of view |
title_fullStr | Comparing outcomes: The Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation from an international point of view |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing outcomes: The Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation from an international point of view |
title_short | Comparing outcomes: The Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation from an international point of view |
title_sort | comparing outcomes: the clinical outcome in routine evaluation from an international point of view |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30779267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1774 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zeldovichmarina comparingoutcomestheclinicaloutcomeinroutineevaluationfromaninternationalpointofview AT alexandrowiczrainerw comparingoutcomestheclinicaloutcomeinroutineevaluationfromaninternationalpointofview |