Cargando…

Comparing outcomes: The Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation from an international point of view

OBJECTIVES: The Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation–Outcome Measure (CORE‐OM) is a freely accessible self‐assessment questionnaire with a total of 34 items measuring the progress of psychological or psychotherapeutic treatments according to four scales (well‐being, problems, functioning, and risk...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeldovich, Marina, Alexandrowicz, Rainer W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30779267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1774
_version_ 1783469287888912384
author Zeldovich, Marina
Alexandrowicz, Rainer W.
author_facet Zeldovich, Marina
Alexandrowicz, Rainer W.
author_sort Zeldovich, Marina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation–Outcome Measure (CORE‐OM) is a freely accessible self‐assessment questionnaire with a total of 34 items measuring the progress of psychological or psychotherapeutic treatments according to four scales (well‐being, problems, functioning, and risk). The CORE‐OM originated in the United Kingdom and has been translated into 54 languages and dialects. The aim of this study is to systematically compare the translated versions. METHOD: A total of 21 translations were compared using methods of systematic review and meta‐analysis. RESULTS: The results show a certain heterogeneity between the studies; however, the 21 translations can be declared as equivalent. CONCLUSION: The factorial structure could not be replicated in any of translations. Therefore, further analysis of the CORE‐OM domains is recommended. In addition, some supplementary restrictions on the translation process, data collection, and reporting of results are necessary to ensure comparability and quality of CORE‐OM translations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6849827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68498272019-11-15 Comparing outcomes: The Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation from an international point of view Zeldovich, Marina Alexandrowicz, Rainer W. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Original Articles OBJECTIVES: The Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation–Outcome Measure (CORE‐OM) is a freely accessible self‐assessment questionnaire with a total of 34 items measuring the progress of psychological or psychotherapeutic treatments according to four scales (well‐being, problems, functioning, and risk). The CORE‐OM originated in the United Kingdom and has been translated into 54 languages and dialects. The aim of this study is to systematically compare the translated versions. METHOD: A total of 21 translations were compared using methods of systematic review and meta‐analysis. RESULTS: The results show a certain heterogeneity between the studies; however, the 21 translations can be declared as equivalent. CONCLUSION: The factorial structure could not be replicated in any of translations. Therefore, further analysis of the CORE‐OM domains is recommended. In addition, some supplementary restrictions on the translation process, data collection, and reporting of results are necessary to ensure comparability and quality of CORE‐OM translations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6849827/ /pubmed/30779267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1774 Text en © 2019 The Authors International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Zeldovich, Marina
Alexandrowicz, Rainer W.
Comparing outcomes: The Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation from an international point of view
title Comparing outcomes: The Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation from an international point of view
title_full Comparing outcomes: The Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation from an international point of view
title_fullStr Comparing outcomes: The Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation from an international point of view
title_full_unstemmed Comparing outcomes: The Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation from an international point of view
title_short Comparing outcomes: The Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation from an international point of view
title_sort comparing outcomes: the clinical outcome in routine evaluation from an international point of view
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30779267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1774
work_keys_str_mv AT zeldovichmarina comparingoutcomestheclinicaloutcomeinroutineevaluationfromaninternationalpointofview
AT alexandrowiczrainerw comparingoutcomestheclinicaloutcomeinroutineevaluationfromaninternationalpointofview