Cargando…
Contact networks structured by sex underpin sex‐specific epidemiology of infection
Contact networks are fundamental to the transmission of infection and host sex often affects the acquisition and progression of infection. However, the epidemiological impacts of sex‐related variation in animal contact networks have rarely been investigated. We test the hypothesis that sex‐biases in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29266710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.12898 |
_version_ | 1783469291730894848 |
---|---|
author | Silk, Matthew J. Weber, Nicola L. Steward, Lucy C. Hodgson, David J. Boots, Mike Croft, Darren P. Delahay, Richard J. McDonald, Robbie A. |
author_facet | Silk, Matthew J. Weber, Nicola L. Steward, Lucy C. Hodgson, David J. Boots, Mike Croft, Darren P. Delahay, Richard J. McDonald, Robbie A. |
author_sort | Silk, Matthew J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Contact networks are fundamental to the transmission of infection and host sex often affects the acquisition and progression of infection. However, the epidemiological impacts of sex‐related variation in animal contact networks have rarely been investigated. We test the hypothesis that sex‐biases in infection are related to variation in multilayer contact networks structured by sex in a population of European badgers Meles meles naturally infected with Mycobacterium bovis. Our key results are that male‐male and between‐sex networks are structured at broader spatial scales than female‐female networks and that in male‐male and between‐sex contact networks, but not female‐female networks, there is a significant relationship between infection and contacts with individuals in other groups. These sex differences in social behaviour may underpin male‐biased acquisition of infection and may result in males being responsible for more between‐group transmission. This highlights the importance of sex‐related variation in host behaviour when managing animal diseases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6849844 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68498442019-11-15 Contact networks structured by sex underpin sex‐specific epidemiology of infection Silk, Matthew J. Weber, Nicola L. Steward, Lucy C. Hodgson, David J. Boots, Mike Croft, Darren P. Delahay, Richard J. McDonald, Robbie A. Ecol Lett Letters Contact networks are fundamental to the transmission of infection and host sex often affects the acquisition and progression of infection. However, the epidemiological impacts of sex‐related variation in animal contact networks have rarely been investigated. We test the hypothesis that sex‐biases in infection are related to variation in multilayer contact networks structured by sex in a population of European badgers Meles meles naturally infected with Mycobacterium bovis. Our key results are that male‐male and between‐sex networks are structured at broader spatial scales than female‐female networks and that in male‐male and between‐sex contact networks, but not female‐female networks, there is a significant relationship between infection and contacts with individuals in other groups. These sex differences in social behaviour may underpin male‐biased acquisition of infection and may result in males being responsible for more between‐group transmission. This highlights the importance of sex‐related variation in host behaviour when managing animal diseases. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-20 2018-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6849844/ /pubmed/29266710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.12898 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology Letters published by CNRS and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Letters Silk, Matthew J. Weber, Nicola L. Steward, Lucy C. Hodgson, David J. Boots, Mike Croft, Darren P. Delahay, Richard J. McDonald, Robbie A. Contact networks structured by sex underpin sex‐specific epidemiology of infection |
title | Contact networks structured by sex underpin sex‐specific epidemiology of infection |
title_full | Contact networks structured by sex underpin sex‐specific epidemiology of infection |
title_fullStr | Contact networks structured by sex underpin sex‐specific epidemiology of infection |
title_full_unstemmed | Contact networks structured by sex underpin sex‐specific epidemiology of infection |
title_short | Contact networks structured by sex underpin sex‐specific epidemiology of infection |
title_sort | contact networks structured by sex underpin sex‐specific epidemiology of infection |
topic | Letters |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29266710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.12898 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silkmatthewj contactnetworksstructuredbysexunderpinsexspecificepidemiologyofinfection AT webernicolal contactnetworksstructuredbysexunderpinsexspecificepidemiologyofinfection AT stewardlucyc contactnetworksstructuredbysexunderpinsexspecificepidemiologyofinfection AT hodgsondavidj contactnetworksstructuredbysexunderpinsexspecificepidemiologyofinfection AT bootsmike contactnetworksstructuredbysexunderpinsexspecificepidemiologyofinfection AT croftdarrenp contactnetworksstructuredbysexunderpinsexspecificepidemiologyofinfection AT delahayrichardj contactnetworksstructuredbysexunderpinsexspecificepidemiologyofinfection AT mcdonaldrobbiea contactnetworksstructuredbysexunderpinsexspecificepidemiologyofinfection |