Cargando…

Contact networks structured by sex underpin sex‐specific epidemiology of infection

Contact networks are fundamental to the transmission of infection and host sex often affects the acquisition and progression of infection. However, the epidemiological impacts of sex‐related variation in animal contact networks have rarely been investigated. We test the hypothesis that sex‐biases in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silk, Matthew J., Weber, Nicola L., Steward, Lucy C., Hodgson, David J., Boots, Mike, Croft, Darren P., Delahay, Richard J., McDonald, Robbie A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29266710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.12898
_version_ 1783469291730894848
author Silk, Matthew J.
Weber, Nicola L.
Steward, Lucy C.
Hodgson, David J.
Boots, Mike
Croft, Darren P.
Delahay, Richard J.
McDonald, Robbie A.
author_facet Silk, Matthew J.
Weber, Nicola L.
Steward, Lucy C.
Hodgson, David J.
Boots, Mike
Croft, Darren P.
Delahay, Richard J.
McDonald, Robbie A.
author_sort Silk, Matthew J.
collection PubMed
description Contact networks are fundamental to the transmission of infection and host sex often affects the acquisition and progression of infection. However, the epidemiological impacts of sex‐related variation in animal contact networks have rarely been investigated. We test the hypothesis that sex‐biases in infection are related to variation in multilayer contact networks structured by sex in a population of European badgers Meles meles naturally infected with Mycobacterium bovis. Our key results are that male‐male and between‐sex networks are structured at broader spatial scales than female‐female networks and that in male‐male and between‐sex contact networks, but not female‐female networks, there is a significant relationship between infection and contacts with individuals in other groups. These sex differences in social behaviour may underpin male‐biased acquisition of infection and may result in males being responsible for more between‐group transmission. This highlights the importance of sex‐related variation in host behaviour when managing animal diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6849844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68498442019-11-15 Contact networks structured by sex underpin sex‐specific epidemiology of infection Silk, Matthew J. Weber, Nicola L. Steward, Lucy C. Hodgson, David J. Boots, Mike Croft, Darren P. Delahay, Richard J. McDonald, Robbie A. Ecol Lett Letters Contact networks are fundamental to the transmission of infection and host sex often affects the acquisition and progression of infection. However, the epidemiological impacts of sex‐related variation in animal contact networks have rarely been investigated. We test the hypothesis that sex‐biases in infection are related to variation in multilayer contact networks structured by sex in a population of European badgers Meles meles naturally infected with Mycobacterium bovis. Our key results are that male‐male and between‐sex networks are structured at broader spatial scales than female‐female networks and that in male‐male and between‐sex contact networks, but not female‐female networks, there is a significant relationship between infection and contacts with individuals in other groups. These sex differences in social behaviour may underpin male‐biased acquisition of infection and may result in males being responsible for more between‐group transmission. This highlights the importance of sex‐related variation in host behaviour when managing animal diseases. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-20 2018-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6849844/ /pubmed/29266710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.12898 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology Letters published by CNRS and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Letters
Silk, Matthew J.
Weber, Nicola L.
Steward, Lucy C.
Hodgson, David J.
Boots, Mike
Croft, Darren P.
Delahay, Richard J.
McDonald, Robbie A.
Contact networks structured by sex underpin sex‐specific epidemiology of infection
title Contact networks structured by sex underpin sex‐specific epidemiology of infection
title_full Contact networks structured by sex underpin sex‐specific epidemiology of infection
title_fullStr Contact networks structured by sex underpin sex‐specific epidemiology of infection
title_full_unstemmed Contact networks structured by sex underpin sex‐specific epidemiology of infection
title_short Contact networks structured by sex underpin sex‐specific epidemiology of infection
title_sort contact networks structured by sex underpin sex‐specific epidemiology of infection
topic Letters
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29266710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.12898
work_keys_str_mv AT silkmatthewj contactnetworksstructuredbysexunderpinsexspecificepidemiologyofinfection
AT webernicolal contactnetworksstructuredbysexunderpinsexspecificepidemiologyofinfection
AT stewardlucyc contactnetworksstructuredbysexunderpinsexspecificepidemiologyofinfection
AT hodgsondavidj contactnetworksstructuredbysexunderpinsexspecificepidemiologyofinfection
AT bootsmike contactnetworksstructuredbysexunderpinsexspecificepidemiologyofinfection
AT croftdarrenp contactnetworksstructuredbysexunderpinsexspecificepidemiologyofinfection
AT delahayrichardj contactnetworksstructuredbysexunderpinsexspecificepidemiologyofinfection
AT mcdonaldrobbiea contactnetworksstructuredbysexunderpinsexspecificepidemiologyofinfection