Cargando…

Evaluating the fate of bacterial indicators, viral indicators, and viruses in water resource recovery facilities

A year‐long sampling campaign at nine water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) was conducted to assess the treatability and fate of bacterial indicators, viral indicators, and viruses. Influent concentrations of viral indicators (male‐specific and somatic coliphages) and bacterial indicators (Esch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Worley‐Morse, Thomas, Mann, Melanie, Khunjar, Wendell, Olabode, Lola, Gonzalez, Raul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30848516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wer.1096
_version_ 1783469300435124224
author Worley‐Morse, Thomas
Mann, Melanie
Khunjar, Wendell
Olabode, Lola
Gonzalez, Raul
author_facet Worley‐Morse, Thomas
Mann, Melanie
Khunjar, Wendell
Olabode, Lola
Gonzalez, Raul
author_sort Worley‐Morse, Thomas
collection PubMed
description A year‐long sampling campaign at nine water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) was conducted to assess the treatability and fate of bacterial indicators, viral indicators, and viruses. Influent concentrations of viral indicators (male‐specific and somatic coliphages) and bacterial indicators (Escherichia coli and enterococci) remained relatively constant, typically varying by one order of magnitude over the course of the year. Annual average bacterial indicator reduction ranged from 4.0 to 6.7 logs, and annual average viral indicator reduction ranged from 1.6 to 5.4 logs. Bacterial and viral indicator reduction depended on the WRRF's treatment processes, and bacterial indicator reduction was greater than viral indicator reduction for many processes. Viral reduction (adenovirus 41, norovirus GI, and norovirus GII) was more similar to viral indicator reduction than bacterial indicator reduction. Overall, this work suggests that viral indicator reduction in WRRFs is variable and depends on specific unit processes. Moreover, for the same unit treatment process, viral indicator reduction and bacterial indicator reduction can vary. PRACTITIONER POINTS: A year‐long sampling campaign was conducted at nine water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs). The treatability and fate of bacterial indicators, viral indicators, and viruses were assessed. Viral indicator reduction in WRRFs is variable and depends on specific unit processes. For the same unit treatment process, viral indicator reduction and bacterial indicator reduction can vary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6849880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68498802019-11-15 Evaluating the fate of bacterial indicators, viral indicators, and viruses in water resource recovery facilities Worley‐Morse, Thomas Mann, Melanie Khunjar, Wendell Olabode, Lola Gonzalez, Raul Water Environ Res Research Articles A year‐long sampling campaign at nine water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) was conducted to assess the treatability and fate of bacterial indicators, viral indicators, and viruses. Influent concentrations of viral indicators (male‐specific and somatic coliphages) and bacterial indicators (Escherichia coli and enterococci) remained relatively constant, typically varying by one order of magnitude over the course of the year. Annual average bacterial indicator reduction ranged from 4.0 to 6.7 logs, and annual average viral indicator reduction ranged from 1.6 to 5.4 logs. Bacterial and viral indicator reduction depended on the WRRF's treatment processes, and bacterial indicator reduction was greater than viral indicator reduction for many processes. Viral reduction (adenovirus 41, norovirus GI, and norovirus GII) was more similar to viral indicator reduction than bacterial indicator reduction. Overall, this work suggests that viral indicator reduction in WRRFs is variable and depends on specific unit processes. Moreover, for the same unit treatment process, viral indicator reduction and bacterial indicator reduction can vary. PRACTITIONER POINTS: A year‐long sampling campaign was conducted at nine water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs). The treatability and fate of bacterial indicators, viral indicators, and viruses were assessed. Viral indicator reduction in WRRFs is variable and depends on specific unit processes. For the same unit treatment process, viral indicator reduction and bacterial indicator reduction can vary. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-20 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6849880/ /pubmed/30848516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wer.1096 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Water Environment Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Water Environment Federation. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Worley‐Morse, Thomas
Mann, Melanie
Khunjar, Wendell
Olabode, Lola
Gonzalez, Raul
Evaluating the fate of bacterial indicators, viral indicators, and viruses in water resource recovery facilities
title Evaluating the fate of bacterial indicators, viral indicators, and viruses in water resource recovery facilities
title_full Evaluating the fate of bacterial indicators, viral indicators, and viruses in water resource recovery facilities
title_fullStr Evaluating the fate of bacterial indicators, viral indicators, and viruses in water resource recovery facilities
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the fate of bacterial indicators, viral indicators, and viruses in water resource recovery facilities
title_short Evaluating the fate of bacterial indicators, viral indicators, and viruses in water resource recovery facilities
title_sort evaluating the fate of bacterial indicators, viral indicators, and viruses in water resource recovery facilities
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6849880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30848516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wer.1096
work_keys_str_mv AT worleymorsethomas evaluatingthefateofbacterialindicatorsviralindicatorsandvirusesinwaterresourcerecoveryfacilities
AT mannmelanie evaluatingthefateofbacterialindicatorsviralindicatorsandvirusesinwaterresourcerecoveryfacilities
AT khunjarwendell evaluatingthefateofbacterialindicatorsviralindicatorsandvirusesinwaterresourcerecoveryfacilities
AT olabodelola evaluatingthefateofbacterialindicatorsviralindicatorsandvirusesinwaterresourcerecoveryfacilities
AT gonzalezraul evaluatingthefateofbacterialindicatorsviralindicatorsandvirusesinwaterresourcerecoveryfacilities