Cargando…
Bioaerosol biomonitoring: Sampling optimization for molecular microbial ecology
Bioaerosols (or biogenic aerosols) have largely been overlooked by molecular ecologists. However, this is rapidly changing as bioaerosols play key roles in public health, environmental chemistry and the dispersal ecology of microbes. Due to the low environmental concentrations of bioaerosols, collec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30735594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13002 |
_version_ | 1783469340654305280 |
---|---|
author | Ferguson, Robert M. W. Garcia‐Alcega, Sonia Coulon, Frederic Dumbrell, Alex J. Whitby, Corinne Colbeck, Ian |
author_facet | Ferguson, Robert M. W. Garcia‐Alcega, Sonia Coulon, Frederic Dumbrell, Alex J. Whitby, Corinne Colbeck, Ian |
author_sort | Ferguson, Robert M. W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bioaerosols (or biogenic aerosols) have largely been overlooked by molecular ecologists. However, this is rapidly changing as bioaerosols play key roles in public health, environmental chemistry and the dispersal ecology of microbes. Due to the low environmental concentrations of bioaerosols, collecting sufficient biomass for molecular methods is challenging. Currently, no standardized methods for bioaerosol collection for molecular ecology research exist. Each study requires a process of optimization, which greatly slows the advance of bioaerosol science. Here, we evaluated air filtration and liquid impingement for bioaerosol sampling across a range of environmental conditions. We also investigated the effect of sampling matrices, sample concentration strategies and sampling duration on DNA yield. Air filtration using polycarbonate filters gave the highest recovery, but due to the faster sampling rates possible with impingement, we recommend this method for fine ‐scale temporal/spatial ecological studies. To prevent bias for the recovery of Gram‐positive bacteria, we found that the matrix for impingement should be phosphate‐buffered saline. The optimal method for bioaerosol concentration from the liquid matrix was centrifugation. However, we also present a method using syringe filters for rapid in‐field recovery of bioaerosols from impingement samples, without compromising microbial diversity for high ‐throughput sequencing approaches. Finally, we provide a resource that enables molecular ecologists to select the most appropriate sampling strategy for their specific research question. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6850074 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68500742019-11-15 Bioaerosol biomonitoring: Sampling optimization for molecular microbial ecology Ferguson, Robert M. W. Garcia‐Alcega, Sonia Coulon, Frederic Dumbrell, Alex J. Whitby, Corinne Colbeck, Ian Mol Ecol Resour RESOURCE ARTICLES Bioaerosols (or biogenic aerosols) have largely been overlooked by molecular ecologists. However, this is rapidly changing as bioaerosols play key roles in public health, environmental chemistry and the dispersal ecology of microbes. Due to the low environmental concentrations of bioaerosols, collecting sufficient biomass for molecular methods is challenging. Currently, no standardized methods for bioaerosol collection for molecular ecology research exist. Each study requires a process of optimization, which greatly slows the advance of bioaerosol science. Here, we evaluated air filtration and liquid impingement for bioaerosol sampling across a range of environmental conditions. We also investigated the effect of sampling matrices, sample concentration strategies and sampling duration on DNA yield. Air filtration using polycarbonate filters gave the highest recovery, but due to the faster sampling rates possible with impingement, we recommend this method for fine ‐scale temporal/spatial ecological studies. To prevent bias for the recovery of Gram‐positive bacteria, we found that the matrix for impingement should be phosphate‐buffered saline. The optimal method for bioaerosol concentration from the liquid matrix was centrifugation. However, we also present a method using syringe filters for rapid in‐field recovery of bioaerosols from impingement samples, without compromising microbial diversity for high ‐throughput sequencing approaches. Finally, we provide a resource that enables molecular ecologists to select the most appropriate sampling strategy for their specific research question. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-20 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6850074/ /pubmed/30735594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13002 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Molecular Ecology Resources Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | RESOURCE ARTICLES Ferguson, Robert M. W. Garcia‐Alcega, Sonia Coulon, Frederic Dumbrell, Alex J. Whitby, Corinne Colbeck, Ian Bioaerosol biomonitoring: Sampling optimization for molecular microbial ecology |
title | Bioaerosol biomonitoring: Sampling optimization for molecular microbial ecology |
title_full | Bioaerosol biomonitoring: Sampling optimization for molecular microbial ecology |
title_fullStr | Bioaerosol biomonitoring: Sampling optimization for molecular microbial ecology |
title_full_unstemmed | Bioaerosol biomonitoring: Sampling optimization for molecular microbial ecology |
title_short | Bioaerosol biomonitoring: Sampling optimization for molecular microbial ecology |
title_sort | bioaerosol biomonitoring: sampling optimization for molecular microbial ecology |
topic | RESOURCE ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30735594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fergusonrobertmw bioaerosolbiomonitoringsamplingoptimizationformolecularmicrobialecology AT garciaalcegasonia bioaerosolbiomonitoringsamplingoptimizationformolecularmicrobialecology AT coulonfrederic bioaerosolbiomonitoringsamplingoptimizationformolecularmicrobialecology AT dumbrellalexj bioaerosolbiomonitoringsamplingoptimizationformolecularmicrobialecology AT whitbycorinne bioaerosolbiomonitoringsamplingoptimizationformolecularmicrobialecology AT colbeckian bioaerosolbiomonitoringsamplingoptimizationformolecularmicrobialecology |