Cargando…

Bioaerosol biomonitoring: Sampling optimization for molecular microbial ecology

Bioaerosols (or biogenic aerosols) have largely been overlooked by molecular ecologists. However, this is rapidly changing as bioaerosols play key roles in public health, environmental chemistry and the dispersal ecology of microbes. Due to the low environmental concentrations of bioaerosols, collec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferguson, Robert M. W., Garcia‐Alcega, Sonia, Coulon, Frederic, Dumbrell, Alex J., Whitby, Corinne, Colbeck, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30735594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13002
_version_ 1783469340654305280
author Ferguson, Robert M. W.
Garcia‐Alcega, Sonia
Coulon, Frederic
Dumbrell, Alex J.
Whitby, Corinne
Colbeck, Ian
author_facet Ferguson, Robert M. W.
Garcia‐Alcega, Sonia
Coulon, Frederic
Dumbrell, Alex J.
Whitby, Corinne
Colbeck, Ian
author_sort Ferguson, Robert M. W.
collection PubMed
description Bioaerosols (or biogenic aerosols) have largely been overlooked by molecular ecologists. However, this is rapidly changing as bioaerosols play key roles in public health, environmental chemistry and the dispersal ecology of microbes. Due to the low environmental concentrations of bioaerosols, collecting sufficient biomass for molecular methods is challenging. Currently, no standardized methods for bioaerosol collection for molecular ecology research exist. Each study requires a process of optimization, which greatly slows the advance of bioaerosol science. Here, we evaluated air filtration and liquid impingement for bioaerosol sampling across a range of environmental conditions. We also investigated the effect of sampling matrices, sample concentration strategies and sampling duration on DNA yield. Air filtration using polycarbonate filters gave the highest recovery, but due to the faster sampling rates possible with impingement, we recommend this method for fine ‐scale temporal/spatial ecological studies. To prevent bias for the recovery of Gram‐positive bacteria, we found that the matrix for impingement should be phosphate‐buffered saline. The optimal method for bioaerosol concentration from the liquid matrix was centrifugation. However, we also present a method using syringe filters for rapid in‐field recovery of bioaerosols from impingement samples, without compromising microbial diversity for high ‐throughput sequencing approaches. Finally, we provide a resource that enables molecular ecologists to select the most appropriate sampling strategy for their specific research question.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6850074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68500742019-11-15 Bioaerosol biomonitoring: Sampling optimization for molecular microbial ecology Ferguson, Robert M. W. Garcia‐Alcega, Sonia Coulon, Frederic Dumbrell, Alex J. Whitby, Corinne Colbeck, Ian Mol Ecol Resour RESOURCE ARTICLES Bioaerosols (or biogenic aerosols) have largely been overlooked by molecular ecologists. However, this is rapidly changing as bioaerosols play key roles in public health, environmental chemistry and the dispersal ecology of microbes. Due to the low environmental concentrations of bioaerosols, collecting sufficient biomass for molecular methods is challenging. Currently, no standardized methods for bioaerosol collection for molecular ecology research exist. Each study requires a process of optimization, which greatly slows the advance of bioaerosol science. Here, we evaluated air filtration and liquid impingement for bioaerosol sampling across a range of environmental conditions. We also investigated the effect of sampling matrices, sample concentration strategies and sampling duration on DNA yield. Air filtration using polycarbonate filters gave the highest recovery, but due to the faster sampling rates possible with impingement, we recommend this method for fine ‐scale temporal/spatial ecological studies. To prevent bias for the recovery of Gram‐positive bacteria, we found that the matrix for impingement should be phosphate‐buffered saline. The optimal method for bioaerosol concentration from the liquid matrix was centrifugation. However, we also present a method using syringe filters for rapid in‐field recovery of bioaerosols from impingement samples, without compromising microbial diversity for high ‐throughput sequencing approaches. Finally, we provide a resource that enables molecular ecologists to select the most appropriate sampling strategy for their specific research question. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-20 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6850074/ /pubmed/30735594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13002 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Molecular Ecology Resources Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESOURCE ARTICLES
Ferguson, Robert M. W.
Garcia‐Alcega, Sonia
Coulon, Frederic
Dumbrell, Alex J.
Whitby, Corinne
Colbeck, Ian
Bioaerosol biomonitoring: Sampling optimization for molecular microbial ecology
title Bioaerosol biomonitoring: Sampling optimization for molecular microbial ecology
title_full Bioaerosol biomonitoring: Sampling optimization for molecular microbial ecology
title_fullStr Bioaerosol biomonitoring: Sampling optimization for molecular microbial ecology
title_full_unstemmed Bioaerosol biomonitoring: Sampling optimization for molecular microbial ecology
title_short Bioaerosol biomonitoring: Sampling optimization for molecular microbial ecology
title_sort bioaerosol biomonitoring: sampling optimization for molecular microbial ecology
topic RESOURCE ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30735594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13002
work_keys_str_mv AT fergusonrobertmw bioaerosolbiomonitoringsamplingoptimizationformolecularmicrobialecology
AT garciaalcegasonia bioaerosolbiomonitoringsamplingoptimizationformolecularmicrobialecology
AT coulonfrederic bioaerosolbiomonitoringsamplingoptimizationformolecularmicrobialecology
AT dumbrellalexj bioaerosolbiomonitoringsamplingoptimizationformolecularmicrobialecology
AT whitbycorinne bioaerosolbiomonitoringsamplingoptimizationformolecularmicrobialecology
AT colbeckian bioaerosolbiomonitoringsamplingoptimizationformolecularmicrobialecology