Cargando…

1‐year outcome after treatment of uterovaginal prolapse with a 6‐point fixation mesh

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to describe the safety and anatomical results of a surgical approach with a single‐incision 6‐point fixation vaginal mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse at perioperatively and at 1‐year follow‐up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective obser...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brandt, Andreas, Kuszka, Andrzej, Niesel, Achim, Lutz, Henrik, Fünfgeld, Christian, Mengel, Mathias, Ulrich, Daniela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30869823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.23968
_version_ 1783469341225779200
author Brandt, Andreas
Kuszka, Andrzej
Niesel, Achim
Lutz, Henrik
Fünfgeld, Christian
Mengel, Mathias
Ulrich, Daniela
author_facet Brandt, Andreas
Kuszka, Andrzej
Niesel, Achim
Lutz, Henrik
Fünfgeld, Christian
Mengel, Mathias
Ulrich, Daniela
author_sort Brandt, Andreas
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to describe the safety and anatomical results of a surgical approach with a single‐incision 6‐point fixation vaginal mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse at perioperatively and at 1‐year follow‐up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of patients who underwent operation receiving an InGYNious anterior transvaginal mesh. All patients with symptomatic stage II prolapse or higher were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were the unwillingness or inability to give written informed consent, neuromuscular disorders, malignant diseases, previous radiation in the pelvis, or chronic pain syndrome. Every patient completed a structured questionnaire and a full physical examination according to the IUGA‐ICS POP‐Q staging system before the operation and at 1‐year follow‐up. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty‐four patients (91%) were included in the study. The intraoperative complication rate was 7% with hemorrhage being the most common complication. Six patients (2.4%) had undergone reoperation for prolapse (four out of the six patients had reoperation in the posterior compartment) and were excluded from the objective outcome analysis. In the remaining 248 patients all POP‐Q measurements were significantly improved in the anterior and apical compartments. Similarly, urge urinary incontinence and voiding dysfunction improved significantly. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, the objective outcome one year after the InGYNious mesh was good with low numbers of mesh‐related problems or reoperation for prolapse.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6850076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68500762019-11-15 1‐year outcome after treatment of uterovaginal prolapse with a 6‐point fixation mesh Brandt, Andreas Kuszka, Andrzej Niesel, Achim Lutz, Henrik Fünfgeld, Christian Mengel, Mathias Ulrich, Daniela Neurourol Urodyn Original Clinical Articles INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to describe the safety and anatomical results of a surgical approach with a single‐incision 6‐point fixation vaginal mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse at perioperatively and at 1‐year follow‐up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of patients who underwent operation receiving an InGYNious anterior transvaginal mesh. All patients with symptomatic stage II prolapse or higher were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were the unwillingness or inability to give written informed consent, neuromuscular disorders, malignant diseases, previous radiation in the pelvis, or chronic pain syndrome. Every patient completed a structured questionnaire and a full physical examination according to the IUGA‐ICS POP‐Q staging system before the operation and at 1‐year follow‐up. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty‐four patients (91%) were included in the study. The intraoperative complication rate was 7% with hemorrhage being the most common complication. Six patients (2.4%) had undergone reoperation for prolapse (four out of the six patients had reoperation in the posterior compartment) and were excluded from the objective outcome analysis. In the remaining 248 patients all POP‐Q measurements were significantly improved in the anterior and apical compartments. Similarly, urge urinary incontinence and voiding dysfunction improved significantly. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, the objective outcome one year after the InGYNious mesh was good with low numbers of mesh‐related problems or reoperation for prolapse. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-14 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6850076/ /pubmed/30869823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.23968 Text en © 2019 The Authors Neurourology and Urodynamics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Clinical Articles
Brandt, Andreas
Kuszka, Andrzej
Niesel, Achim
Lutz, Henrik
Fünfgeld, Christian
Mengel, Mathias
Ulrich, Daniela
1‐year outcome after treatment of uterovaginal prolapse with a 6‐point fixation mesh
title 1‐year outcome after treatment of uterovaginal prolapse with a 6‐point fixation mesh
title_full 1‐year outcome after treatment of uterovaginal prolapse with a 6‐point fixation mesh
title_fullStr 1‐year outcome after treatment of uterovaginal prolapse with a 6‐point fixation mesh
title_full_unstemmed 1‐year outcome after treatment of uterovaginal prolapse with a 6‐point fixation mesh
title_short 1‐year outcome after treatment of uterovaginal prolapse with a 6‐point fixation mesh
title_sort 1‐year outcome after treatment of uterovaginal prolapse with a 6‐point fixation mesh
topic Original Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30869823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.23968
work_keys_str_mv AT brandtandreas 1yearoutcomeaftertreatmentofuterovaginalprolapsewitha6pointfixationmesh
AT kuszkaandrzej 1yearoutcomeaftertreatmentofuterovaginalprolapsewitha6pointfixationmesh
AT nieselachim 1yearoutcomeaftertreatmentofuterovaginalprolapsewitha6pointfixationmesh
AT lutzhenrik 1yearoutcomeaftertreatmentofuterovaginalprolapsewitha6pointfixationmesh
AT funfgeldchristian 1yearoutcomeaftertreatmentofuterovaginalprolapsewitha6pointfixationmesh
AT mengelmathias 1yearoutcomeaftertreatmentofuterovaginalprolapsewitha6pointfixationmesh
AT ulrichdaniela 1yearoutcomeaftertreatmentofuterovaginalprolapsewitha6pointfixationmesh