Cargando…

A pilot feasibility randomised clinical trial comparing dialkylcarbamoylchloride‐coated dressings versus standard care for the primary prevention of surgical site infection

A surgical site infection (SSI) may occur in up to 30% of procedures and results in significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) examining the use of dialkylcarbamoylchloride (DACC)‐impregnated dressings, which bind bacteri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Totty, Joshua P., Hitchman, Louise H., Cai, Paris L., Harwood, Amy E., Wallace, Tom, Carradice, Dan, Smith, George E., Chetter, Ian C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30868734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13113
_version_ 1783469355549327360
author Totty, Joshua P.
Hitchman, Louise H.
Cai, Paris L.
Harwood, Amy E.
Wallace, Tom
Carradice, Dan
Smith, George E.
Chetter, Ian C.
author_facet Totty, Joshua P.
Hitchman, Louise H.
Cai, Paris L.
Harwood, Amy E.
Wallace, Tom
Carradice, Dan
Smith, George E.
Chetter, Ian C.
author_sort Totty, Joshua P.
collection PubMed
description A surgical site infection (SSI) may occur in up to 30% of procedures and results in significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) examining the use of dialkylcarbamoylchloride (DACC)‐impregnated dressings, which bind bacteria at the wound bed, in the prevention of SSI in primarily closed incisional wounds. This pilot RCT recruited patients undergoing clean or clean‐contaminated vascular surgery. Participants were randomised intraoperatively on a 1:1 basis to either a DACC‐coated dressing or a control dressing. Outcomes were divided into feasibility and clinical outcomes. The primary clinical outcome was SSI at 30 days (assessed using Centers for Disease Control criteria and Additional treatment, Serous discharge, Erythema, Purulent exudate, Separation of the deep tissues, Isolation of bacteria and duration of inpatient Stay scoring methods). This study recruited 144 patients in 12 months at a median rate of 10 per month. Eligibility was 73% and recruitment 60%. At 30 days, there was a 36.9% relative risk reduction in the DACC‐coated arm (16.22% versus 25.71%, odds ratio 0.559, P = 0.161). The number needed to treat was 11 patients. A large‐scale RCT is both achievable and desirable given the relative risk reduction shown in this study. Further work is needed to improve the study protocol and involve more centres in a full‐scale RCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6850133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68501332019-11-15 A pilot feasibility randomised clinical trial comparing dialkylcarbamoylchloride‐coated dressings versus standard care for the primary prevention of surgical site infection Totty, Joshua P. Hitchman, Louise H. Cai, Paris L. Harwood, Amy E. Wallace, Tom Carradice, Dan Smith, George E. Chetter, Ian C. Int Wound J Original Articles A surgical site infection (SSI) may occur in up to 30% of procedures and results in significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) examining the use of dialkylcarbamoylchloride (DACC)‐impregnated dressings, which bind bacteria at the wound bed, in the prevention of SSI in primarily closed incisional wounds. This pilot RCT recruited patients undergoing clean or clean‐contaminated vascular surgery. Participants were randomised intraoperatively on a 1:1 basis to either a DACC‐coated dressing or a control dressing. Outcomes were divided into feasibility and clinical outcomes. The primary clinical outcome was SSI at 30 days (assessed using Centers for Disease Control criteria and Additional treatment, Serous discharge, Erythema, Purulent exudate, Separation of the deep tissues, Isolation of bacteria and duration of inpatient Stay scoring methods). This study recruited 144 patients in 12 months at a median rate of 10 per month. Eligibility was 73% and recruitment 60%. At 30 days, there was a 36.9% relative risk reduction in the DACC‐coated arm (16.22% versus 25.71%, odds ratio 0.559, P = 0.161). The number needed to treat was 11 patients. A large‐scale RCT is both achievable and desirable given the relative risk reduction shown in this study. Further work is needed to improve the study protocol and involve more centres in a full‐scale RCT. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2019-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6850133/ /pubmed/30868734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13113 Text en © 2019 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Totty, Joshua P.
Hitchman, Louise H.
Cai, Paris L.
Harwood, Amy E.
Wallace, Tom
Carradice, Dan
Smith, George E.
Chetter, Ian C.
A pilot feasibility randomised clinical trial comparing dialkylcarbamoylchloride‐coated dressings versus standard care for the primary prevention of surgical site infection
title A pilot feasibility randomised clinical trial comparing dialkylcarbamoylchloride‐coated dressings versus standard care for the primary prevention of surgical site infection
title_full A pilot feasibility randomised clinical trial comparing dialkylcarbamoylchloride‐coated dressings versus standard care for the primary prevention of surgical site infection
title_fullStr A pilot feasibility randomised clinical trial comparing dialkylcarbamoylchloride‐coated dressings versus standard care for the primary prevention of surgical site infection
title_full_unstemmed A pilot feasibility randomised clinical trial comparing dialkylcarbamoylchloride‐coated dressings versus standard care for the primary prevention of surgical site infection
title_short A pilot feasibility randomised clinical trial comparing dialkylcarbamoylchloride‐coated dressings versus standard care for the primary prevention of surgical site infection
title_sort pilot feasibility randomised clinical trial comparing dialkylcarbamoylchloride‐coated dressings versus standard care for the primary prevention of surgical site infection
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30868734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13113
work_keys_str_mv AT tottyjoshuap apilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection
AT hitchmanlouiseh apilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection
AT caiparisl apilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection
AT harwoodamye apilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection
AT wallacetom apilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection
AT carradicedan apilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection
AT smithgeorgee apilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection
AT chetterianc apilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection
AT tottyjoshuap pilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection
AT hitchmanlouiseh pilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection
AT caiparisl pilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection
AT harwoodamye pilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection
AT wallacetom pilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection
AT carradicedan pilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection
AT smithgeorgee pilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection
AT chetterianc pilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection