Cargando…
A pilot feasibility randomised clinical trial comparing dialkylcarbamoylchloride‐coated dressings versus standard care for the primary prevention of surgical site infection
A surgical site infection (SSI) may occur in up to 30% of procedures and results in significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) examining the use of dialkylcarbamoylchloride (DACC)‐impregnated dressings, which bind bacteri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30868734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13113 |
_version_ | 1783469355549327360 |
---|---|
author | Totty, Joshua P. Hitchman, Louise H. Cai, Paris L. Harwood, Amy E. Wallace, Tom Carradice, Dan Smith, George E. Chetter, Ian C. |
author_facet | Totty, Joshua P. Hitchman, Louise H. Cai, Paris L. Harwood, Amy E. Wallace, Tom Carradice, Dan Smith, George E. Chetter, Ian C. |
author_sort | Totty, Joshua P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A surgical site infection (SSI) may occur in up to 30% of procedures and results in significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) examining the use of dialkylcarbamoylchloride (DACC)‐impregnated dressings, which bind bacteria at the wound bed, in the prevention of SSI in primarily closed incisional wounds. This pilot RCT recruited patients undergoing clean or clean‐contaminated vascular surgery. Participants were randomised intraoperatively on a 1:1 basis to either a DACC‐coated dressing or a control dressing. Outcomes were divided into feasibility and clinical outcomes. The primary clinical outcome was SSI at 30 days (assessed using Centers for Disease Control criteria and Additional treatment, Serous discharge, Erythema, Purulent exudate, Separation of the deep tissues, Isolation of bacteria and duration of inpatient Stay scoring methods). This study recruited 144 patients in 12 months at a median rate of 10 per month. Eligibility was 73% and recruitment 60%. At 30 days, there was a 36.9% relative risk reduction in the DACC‐coated arm (16.22% versus 25.71%, odds ratio 0.559, P = 0.161). The number needed to treat was 11 patients. A large‐scale RCT is both achievable and desirable given the relative risk reduction shown in this study. Further work is needed to improve the study protocol and involve more centres in a full‐scale RCT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6850133 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68501332019-11-15 A pilot feasibility randomised clinical trial comparing dialkylcarbamoylchloride‐coated dressings versus standard care for the primary prevention of surgical site infection Totty, Joshua P. Hitchman, Louise H. Cai, Paris L. Harwood, Amy E. Wallace, Tom Carradice, Dan Smith, George E. Chetter, Ian C. Int Wound J Original Articles A surgical site infection (SSI) may occur in up to 30% of procedures and results in significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) examining the use of dialkylcarbamoylchloride (DACC)‐impregnated dressings, which bind bacteria at the wound bed, in the prevention of SSI in primarily closed incisional wounds. This pilot RCT recruited patients undergoing clean or clean‐contaminated vascular surgery. Participants were randomised intraoperatively on a 1:1 basis to either a DACC‐coated dressing or a control dressing. Outcomes were divided into feasibility and clinical outcomes. The primary clinical outcome was SSI at 30 days (assessed using Centers for Disease Control criteria and Additional treatment, Serous discharge, Erythema, Purulent exudate, Separation of the deep tissues, Isolation of bacteria and duration of inpatient Stay scoring methods). This study recruited 144 patients in 12 months at a median rate of 10 per month. Eligibility was 73% and recruitment 60%. At 30 days, there was a 36.9% relative risk reduction in the DACC‐coated arm (16.22% versus 25.71%, odds ratio 0.559, P = 0.161). The number needed to treat was 11 patients. A large‐scale RCT is both achievable and desirable given the relative risk reduction shown in this study. Further work is needed to improve the study protocol and involve more centres in a full‐scale RCT. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2019-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6850133/ /pubmed/30868734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13113 Text en © 2019 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Totty, Joshua P. Hitchman, Louise H. Cai, Paris L. Harwood, Amy E. Wallace, Tom Carradice, Dan Smith, George E. Chetter, Ian C. A pilot feasibility randomised clinical trial comparing dialkylcarbamoylchloride‐coated dressings versus standard care for the primary prevention of surgical site infection |
title | A pilot feasibility randomised clinical trial comparing dialkylcarbamoylchloride‐coated dressings versus standard care for the primary prevention of surgical site infection |
title_full | A pilot feasibility randomised clinical trial comparing dialkylcarbamoylchloride‐coated dressings versus standard care for the primary prevention of surgical site infection |
title_fullStr | A pilot feasibility randomised clinical trial comparing dialkylcarbamoylchloride‐coated dressings versus standard care for the primary prevention of surgical site infection |
title_full_unstemmed | A pilot feasibility randomised clinical trial comparing dialkylcarbamoylchloride‐coated dressings versus standard care for the primary prevention of surgical site infection |
title_short | A pilot feasibility randomised clinical trial comparing dialkylcarbamoylchloride‐coated dressings versus standard care for the primary prevention of surgical site infection |
title_sort | pilot feasibility randomised clinical trial comparing dialkylcarbamoylchloride‐coated dressings versus standard care for the primary prevention of surgical site infection |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30868734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13113 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tottyjoshuap apilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection AT hitchmanlouiseh apilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection AT caiparisl apilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection AT harwoodamye apilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection AT wallacetom apilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection AT carradicedan apilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection AT smithgeorgee apilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection AT chetterianc apilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection AT tottyjoshuap pilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection AT hitchmanlouiseh pilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection AT caiparisl pilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection AT harwoodamye pilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection AT wallacetom pilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection AT carradicedan pilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection AT smithgeorgee pilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection AT chetterianc pilotfeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingdialkylcarbamoylchloridecoateddressingsversusstandardcarefortheprimarypreventionofsurgicalsiteinfection |