Cargando…

Acute surgical wound‐dressing procedure: Description of the steps involved in the development and validation of an observational metric

The aim of this study was to develop an observational metric that could be used to assess the performance of a practitioner in completing an acute surgical wound‐dressing procedure using aseptic non‐touch technique (ANTT). A team of clinicians, academics, and researchers came together to develop an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hegarty, Josephine, Howson, Victoria, Wills, Teresa, Creedon, Sile A., Mc Cluskey, Pat, Lane, Aoife, Connolly, Aine, Walshe, Nuala, Noonan, Brendan, Guidera, Fiona, Gallagher, Anthony G, Murphy, Siobhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30932342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13072
_version_ 1783469368605147136
author Hegarty, Josephine
Howson, Victoria
Wills, Teresa
Creedon, Sile A.
Mc Cluskey, Pat
Lane, Aoife
Connolly, Aine
Walshe, Nuala
Noonan, Brendan
Guidera, Fiona
Gallagher, Anthony G
Murphy, Siobhan
author_facet Hegarty, Josephine
Howson, Victoria
Wills, Teresa
Creedon, Sile A.
Mc Cluskey, Pat
Lane, Aoife
Connolly, Aine
Walshe, Nuala
Noonan, Brendan
Guidera, Fiona
Gallagher, Anthony G
Murphy, Siobhan
author_sort Hegarty, Josephine
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to develop an observational metric that could be used to assess the performance of a practitioner in completing an acute surgical wound‐dressing procedure using aseptic non‐touch technique (ANTT). A team of clinicians, academics, and researchers came together to develop an observational metric using an iterative six‐stage process, culminating in a Delphi panel meeting. A scoping review of the literature provided a background empirical perspective relating to wound‐dressing procedure performance. Video recordings of acute surgical wound‐dressing procedures performed by nurses in clinical (n = 11) and simulated (n = 3) settings were viewed repeatedly and were iteratively deconstructed by the metric development group. This facilitated the identification of the discrete component steps, potential errors, and sentinel (serious) errors, which characterise a wound dressing procedure and formed part of the observational metric. The ANTT wound‐dressing observational metric was stress tested for clarity, the ability to be scored, and interrater reliability, calculated during a further phase of video analysis. The metric was then subjected to a process of cyclical evaluation by a Delphi panel (n = 21) to obtain face and content validity of the metric. The Delphi panel deliberation verified the face and content validity of the metric. The final metric has three phases, 31 individual steps, 18 errors, and 27 sentinel errors. The metric is a tool that identifies the standard to be attained in the performance of acute surgical wound dressings. It can be used as both an adjunct to an educational programme and as a tool to assess a practitioner's performance of a wound‐dressing procedure in both simulated and clinical practice contexts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6850176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68501762019-11-18 Acute surgical wound‐dressing procedure: Description of the steps involved in the development and validation of an observational metric Hegarty, Josephine Howson, Victoria Wills, Teresa Creedon, Sile A. Mc Cluskey, Pat Lane, Aoife Connolly, Aine Walshe, Nuala Noonan, Brendan Guidera, Fiona Gallagher, Anthony G Murphy, Siobhan Int Wound J Original Articles The aim of this study was to develop an observational metric that could be used to assess the performance of a practitioner in completing an acute surgical wound‐dressing procedure using aseptic non‐touch technique (ANTT). A team of clinicians, academics, and researchers came together to develop an observational metric using an iterative six‐stage process, culminating in a Delphi panel meeting. A scoping review of the literature provided a background empirical perspective relating to wound‐dressing procedure performance. Video recordings of acute surgical wound‐dressing procedures performed by nurses in clinical (n = 11) and simulated (n = 3) settings were viewed repeatedly and were iteratively deconstructed by the metric development group. This facilitated the identification of the discrete component steps, potential errors, and sentinel (serious) errors, which characterise a wound dressing procedure and formed part of the observational metric. The ANTT wound‐dressing observational metric was stress tested for clarity, the ability to be scored, and interrater reliability, calculated during a further phase of video analysis. The metric was then subjected to a process of cyclical evaluation by a Delphi panel (n = 21) to obtain face and content validity of the metric. The Delphi panel deliberation verified the face and content validity of the metric. The final metric has three phases, 31 individual steps, 18 errors, and 27 sentinel errors. The metric is a tool that identifies the standard to be attained in the performance of acute surgical wound dressings. It can be used as both an adjunct to an educational programme and as a tool to assess a practitioner's performance of a wound‐dressing procedure in both simulated and clinical practice contexts. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2019-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6850176/ /pubmed/30932342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13072 Text en © 2019 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hegarty, Josephine
Howson, Victoria
Wills, Teresa
Creedon, Sile A.
Mc Cluskey, Pat
Lane, Aoife
Connolly, Aine
Walshe, Nuala
Noonan, Brendan
Guidera, Fiona
Gallagher, Anthony G
Murphy, Siobhan
Acute surgical wound‐dressing procedure: Description of the steps involved in the development and validation of an observational metric
title Acute surgical wound‐dressing procedure: Description of the steps involved in the development and validation of an observational metric
title_full Acute surgical wound‐dressing procedure: Description of the steps involved in the development and validation of an observational metric
title_fullStr Acute surgical wound‐dressing procedure: Description of the steps involved in the development and validation of an observational metric
title_full_unstemmed Acute surgical wound‐dressing procedure: Description of the steps involved in the development and validation of an observational metric
title_short Acute surgical wound‐dressing procedure: Description of the steps involved in the development and validation of an observational metric
title_sort acute surgical wound‐dressing procedure: description of the steps involved in the development and validation of an observational metric
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30932342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13072
work_keys_str_mv AT hegartyjosephine acutesurgicalwounddressingproceduredescriptionofthestepsinvolvedinthedevelopmentandvalidationofanobservationalmetric
AT howsonvictoria acutesurgicalwounddressingproceduredescriptionofthestepsinvolvedinthedevelopmentandvalidationofanobservationalmetric
AT willsteresa acutesurgicalwounddressingproceduredescriptionofthestepsinvolvedinthedevelopmentandvalidationofanobservationalmetric
AT creedonsilea acutesurgicalwounddressingproceduredescriptionofthestepsinvolvedinthedevelopmentandvalidationofanobservationalmetric
AT mccluskeypat acutesurgicalwounddressingproceduredescriptionofthestepsinvolvedinthedevelopmentandvalidationofanobservationalmetric
AT laneaoife acutesurgicalwounddressingproceduredescriptionofthestepsinvolvedinthedevelopmentandvalidationofanobservationalmetric
AT connollyaine acutesurgicalwounddressingproceduredescriptionofthestepsinvolvedinthedevelopmentandvalidationofanobservationalmetric
AT walshenuala acutesurgicalwounddressingproceduredescriptionofthestepsinvolvedinthedevelopmentandvalidationofanobservationalmetric
AT noonanbrendan acutesurgicalwounddressingproceduredescriptionofthestepsinvolvedinthedevelopmentandvalidationofanobservationalmetric
AT guiderafiona acutesurgicalwounddressingproceduredescriptionofthestepsinvolvedinthedevelopmentandvalidationofanobservationalmetric
AT gallagheranthonyg acutesurgicalwounddressingproceduredescriptionofthestepsinvolvedinthedevelopmentandvalidationofanobservationalmetric
AT murphysiobhan acutesurgicalwounddressingproceduredescriptionofthestepsinvolvedinthedevelopmentandvalidationofanobservationalmetric