Cargando…

The efficacy and safety of fluticasone/salmeterol compared to fluticasone in children younger than four years of age

BACKGROUND: Fluticasone propionate 50 μg/salmeterol xinafoate 25 μg (FP/SAL) is widely used in adults and children with asthma, but there is sparse information on its use in very young children. METHODS: This was a randomized, double‐blind, multicentre, controlled trial conducted in children aged 8 ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoshihara, Shigemi, Tsubaki, Toshikazu, Ikeda, Masanori, Lenney, Warren, Tomiak, Richard, Hattori, Takako, Hashimoto, Kenichi, Soutome, Toru, Kato, Shihona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30556939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pai.13010
_version_ 1783469374801182720
author Yoshihara, Shigemi
Tsubaki, Toshikazu
Ikeda, Masanori
Lenney, Warren
Tomiak, Richard
Hattori, Takako
Hashimoto, Kenichi
Soutome, Toru
Kato, Shihona
author_facet Yoshihara, Shigemi
Tsubaki, Toshikazu
Ikeda, Masanori
Lenney, Warren
Tomiak, Richard
Hattori, Takako
Hashimoto, Kenichi
Soutome, Toru
Kato, Shihona
author_sort Yoshihara, Shigemi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fluticasone propionate 50 μg/salmeterol xinafoate 25 μg (FP/SAL) is widely used in adults and children with asthma, but there is sparse information on its use in very young children. METHODS: This was a randomized, double‐blind, multicentre, controlled trial conducted in children aged 8 months to 4 years. During a 2‐week run‐in period, they all received FP twice daily. At randomization, they commenced FP/SAL or FP twice daily for 8 weeks. All were then given FP/SAL only, in a 16‐week open‐label study continuation. Medications were inhaled through an AeroChamber Plus with attached face mask. The primary end‐point was mean change in total asthma symptom scores from baseline to the last 7 days of the double‐blind period. Analyses were undertaken in all children randomized to treatment and who received at least one dose of study medication. RESULTS: Three hundred children were randomized 1:1 to receive FP/SAL or FP. Mean change from baseline in total asthma symptom scores was –3.97 for FP/SAL and –3.01 with FP. The between‐group difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.21; 95% confidence interval: −2.47, 0.54). No new safety signals were seen with FP/SAL. CONCLUSION: This is the first randomized, double‐blind study of this size to evaluate FP/SAL in very young children with asthma. FP/SAL did not show superior efficacy to FP; no clear add‐on effect of SAL was demonstrated. No clinically significant differences in safety were noted with FP/SAL usage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6850202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68502022019-11-18 The efficacy and safety of fluticasone/salmeterol compared to fluticasone in children younger than four years of age Yoshihara, Shigemi Tsubaki, Toshikazu Ikeda, Masanori Lenney, Warren Tomiak, Richard Hattori, Takako Hashimoto, Kenichi Soutome, Toru Kato, Shihona Pediatr Allergy Immunol ORIGINAL ARTICLES BACKGROUND: Fluticasone propionate 50 μg/salmeterol xinafoate 25 μg (FP/SAL) is widely used in adults and children with asthma, but there is sparse information on its use in very young children. METHODS: This was a randomized, double‐blind, multicentre, controlled trial conducted in children aged 8 months to 4 years. During a 2‐week run‐in period, they all received FP twice daily. At randomization, they commenced FP/SAL or FP twice daily for 8 weeks. All were then given FP/SAL only, in a 16‐week open‐label study continuation. Medications were inhaled through an AeroChamber Plus with attached face mask. The primary end‐point was mean change in total asthma symptom scores from baseline to the last 7 days of the double‐blind period. Analyses were undertaken in all children randomized to treatment and who received at least one dose of study medication. RESULTS: Three hundred children were randomized 1:1 to receive FP/SAL or FP. Mean change from baseline in total asthma symptom scores was –3.97 for FP/SAL and –3.01 with FP. The between‐group difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.21; 95% confidence interval: −2.47, 0.54). No new safety signals were seen with FP/SAL. CONCLUSION: This is the first randomized, double‐blind study of this size to evaluate FP/SAL in very young children with asthma. FP/SAL did not show superior efficacy to FP; no clear add‐on effect of SAL was demonstrated. No clinically significant differences in safety were noted with FP/SAL usage. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-06 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6850202/ /pubmed/30556939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pai.13010 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Yoshihara, Shigemi
Tsubaki, Toshikazu
Ikeda, Masanori
Lenney, Warren
Tomiak, Richard
Hattori, Takako
Hashimoto, Kenichi
Soutome, Toru
Kato, Shihona
The efficacy and safety of fluticasone/salmeterol compared to fluticasone in children younger than four years of age
title The efficacy and safety of fluticasone/salmeterol compared to fluticasone in children younger than four years of age
title_full The efficacy and safety of fluticasone/salmeterol compared to fluticasone in children younger than four years of age
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of fluticasone/salmeterol compared to fluticasone in children younger than four years of age
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of fluticasone/salmeterol compared to fluticasone in children younger than four years of age
title_short The efficacy and safety of fluticasone/salmeterol compared to fluticasone in children younger than four years of age
title_sort efficacy and safety of fluticasone/salmeterol compared to fluticasone in children younger than four years of age
topic ORIGINAL ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30556939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pai.13010
work_keys_str_mv AT yoshiharashigemi theefficacyandsafetyoffluticasonesalmeterolcomparedtofluticasoneinchildrenyoungerthanfouryearsofage
AT tsubakitoshikazu theefficacyandsafetyoffluticasonesalmeterolcomparedtofluticasoneinchildrenyoungerthanfouryearsofage
AT ikedamasanori theefficacyandsafetyoffluticasonesalmeterolcomparedtofluticasoneinchildrenyoungerthanfouryearsofage
AT lenneywarren theefficacyandsafetyoffluticasonesalmeterolcomparedtofluticasoneinchildrenyoungerthanfouryearsofage
AT tomiakrichard theefficacyandsafetyoffluticasonesalmeterolcomparedtofluticasoneinchildrenyoungerthanfouryearsofage
AT hattoritakako theefficacyandsafetyoffluticasonesalmeterolcomparedtofluticasoneinchildrenyoungerthanfouryearsofage
AT hashimotokenichi theefficacyandsafetyoffluticasonesalmeterolcomparedtofluticasoneinchildrenyoungerthanfouryearsofage
AT soutometoru theefficacyandsafetyoffluticasonesalmeterolcomparedtofluticasoneinchildrenyoungerthanfouryearsofage
AT katoshihona theefficacyandsafetyoffluticasonesalmeterolcomparedtofluticasoneinchildrenyoungerthanfouryearsofage
AT yoshiharashigemi efficacyandsafetyoffluticasonesalmeterolcomparedtofluticasoneinchildrenyoungerthanfouryearsofage
AT tsubakitoshikazu efficacyandsafetyoffluticasonesalmeterolcomparedtofluticasoneinchildrenyoungerthanfouryearsofage
AT ikedamasanori efficacyandsafetyoffluticasonesalmeterolcomparedtofluticasoneinchildrenyoungerthanfouryearsofage
AT lenneywarren efficacyandsafetyoffluticasonesalmeterolcomparedtofluticasoneinchildrenyoungerthanfouryearsofage
AT tomiakrichard efficacyandsafetyoffluticasonesalmeterolcomparedtofluticasoneinchildrenyoungerthanfouryearsofage
AT hattoritakako efficacyandsafetyoffluticasonesalmeterolcomparedtofluticasoneinchildrenyoungerthanfouryearsofage
AT hashimotokenichi efficacyandsafetyoffluticasonesalmeterolcomparedtofluticasoneinchildrenyoungerthanfouryearsofage
AT soutometoru efficacyandsafetyoffluticasonesalmeterolcomparedtofluticasoneinchildrenyoungerthanfouryearsofage
AT katoshihona efficacyandsafetyoffluticasonesalmeterolcomparedtofluticasoneinchildrenyoungerthanfouryearsofage