Cargando…

Effectiveness of paediatric occupational therapy for children with disabilities: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Paediatric occupational therapy seeks to improve children's engagement and participation in life roles. A wide variety of intervention approaches exist. Our aim was to summarise the best‐available intervention evidence for children with disabilities, to assist families and therapi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Novak, Iona, Honan, Ingrid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30968419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12573
_version_ 1783469376667648000
author Novak, Iona
Honan, Ingrid
author_facet Novak, Iona
Honan, Ingrid
author_sort Novak, Iona
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Paediatric occupational therapy seeks to improve children's engagement and participation in life roles. A wide variety of intervention approaches exist. Our aim was to summarise the best‐available intervention evidence for children with disabilities, to assist families and therapists choose effective care. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review (SR) using the Cochrane methodology, and reported findings according to PRISMA. CINAHL, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, OTSeeker, PEDro, PsycINFO were searched. Two independent reviewers: (i) determined whether studies met inclusion: SR or randomised controlled trial (RCT); an occupational therapy intervention for children with a disability; (ii) categorised interventions based on name, core components and diagnostic population; (iii) rated quality of evidence and determined the strength of recommendation using GRADE criteria; and (iv) made recommendations using the Evidence Alert Traffic Light System. RESULTS: 129 articles met inclusion (n = 75 (58%) SRs; n = 54 (42%)) RCTs, measuring the effectiveness of 52 interventions, across 22 diagnoses, enabling analysis of 135 intervention indications. Thirty percent of the indications assessed (n = 40/135) were graded ‘do it’ (Green Go); 56% (75/135) ‘probably do it’ (Yellow Measure); 10% (n = 14/135) ‘probably don't do it’ (Yellow Measure); and 4% (n = 6/135) ‘don't do it’ (Red Stop). Green lights were: Behavioural Interventions; Bimanual; Coaching; Cognitive Cog‐Fun & CAPS; CO‐OP; CIMT; CIMT plus Bimanual; Context‐Focused; Ditto; Early Intervention (ABA, Developmental Care); Family Centred Care; Feeding interventions; Goal Directed Training; Handwriting Task‐Specific Practice; Home Programs; Joint Attention; Mental Health Interventions; occupational therapy after toxin; Kinesiotape; Pain Management; Parent Education; PECS; Positioning; Pressure Care; Social Skills Training; Treadmill Training and Weight Loss ‘Mighty Moves’. CONCLUSION: Evidence supports 40 intervention indications, with the greatest number at the activities‐level of the International Classification of Function. Yellow light interventions should be accompanied by a sensitive outcome measure to monitor progress and red light interventions could be discontinued because effective alternatives existed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6850210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68502102019-11-18 Effectiveness of paediatric occupational therapy for children with disabilities: A systematic review Novak, Iona Honan, Ingrid Aust Occup Ther J Review Articles INTRODUCTION: Paediatric occupational therapy seeks to improve children's engagement and participation in life roles. A wide variety of intervention approaches exist. Our aim was to summarise the best‐available intervention evidence for children with disabilities, to assist families and therapists choose effective care. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review (SR) using the Cochrane methodology, and reported findings according to PRISMA. CINAHL, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, OTSeeker, PEDro, PsycINFO were searched. Two independent reviewers: (i) determined whether studies met inclusion: SR or randomised controlled trial (RCT); an occupational therapy intervention for children with a disability; (ii) categorised interventions based on name, core components and diagnostic population; (iii) rated quality of evidence and determined the strength of recommendation using GRADE criteria; and (iv) made recommendations using the Evidence Alert Traffic Light System. RESULTS: 129 articles met inclusion (n = 75 (58%) SRs; n = 54 (42%)) RCTs, measuring the effectiveness of 52 interventions, across 22 diagnoses, enabling analysis of 135 intervention indications. Thirty percent of the indications assessed (n = 40/135) were graded ‘do it’ (Green Go); 56% (75/135) ‘probably do it’ (Yellow Measure); 10% (n = 14/135) ‘probably don't do it’ (Yellow Measure); and 4% (n = 6/135) ‘don't do it’ (Red Stop). Green lights were: Behavioural Interventions; Bimanual; Coaching; Cognitive Cog‐Fun & CAPS; CO‐OP; CIMT; CIMT plus Bimanual; Context‐Focused; Ditto; Early Intervention (ABA, Developmental Care); Family Centred Care; Feeding interventions; Goal Directed Training; Handwriting Task‐Specific Practice; Home Programs; Joint Attention; Mental Health Interventions; occupational therapy after toxin; Kinesiotape; Pain Management; Parent Education; PECS; Positioning; Pressure Care; Social Skills Training; Treadmill Training and Weight Loss ‘Mighty Moves’. CONCLUSION: Evidence supports 40 intervention indications, with the greatest number at the activities‐level of the International Classification of Function. Yellow light interventions should be accompanied by a sensitive outcome measure to monitor progress and red light interventions could be discontinued because effective alternatives existed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-10 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6850210/ /pubmed/30968419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12573 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Occupational TherapyAustralia This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Novak, Iona
Honan, Ingrid
Effectiveness of paediatric occupational therapy for children with disabilities: A systematic review
title Effectiveness of paediatric occupational therapy for children with disabilities: A systematic review
title_full Effectiveness of paediatric occupational therapy for children with disabilities: A systematic review
title_fullStr Effectiveness of paediatric occupational therapy for children with disabilities: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of paediatric occupational therapy for children with disabilities: A systematic review
title_short Effectiveness of paediatric occupational therapy for children with disabilities: A systematic review
title_sort effectiveness of paediatric occupational therapy for children with disabilities: a systematic review
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30968419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12573
work_keys_str_mv AT novakiona effectivenessofpaediatricoccupationaltherapyforchildrenwithdisabilitiesasystematicreview
AT honaningrid effectivenessofpaediatricoccupationaltherapyforchildrenwithdisabilitiesasystematicreview