Cargando…
Null Hypothesis Testing ≠ Scientific Inference: A Critique of the Shaky Premise at the Heart of the Science and Values Debate, and a Defense of Value‐Neutral Risk Assessment
Many philosophers and statisticians argue that risk assessors are morally obligated to evaluate the probabilities and consequences of methodological error, and to base their decisions of whether to adopt a given parameter value, model, or hypothesis on those considerations. This argument is couched...
Autor principal: | MacGillivray, Brian H. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30742707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/risa.13284 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Shaky Game
por: Fine, Arthur
Publicado: (2012) -
Shaky game: Einstein realism and the quantum theory
por: Fine, Arthur
Publicado: (1986) -
Debating DSM-5: diagnosis and the sociology of critique
por: Pickersgill, Martyn D
Publicado: (2014) -
Debate, Research and Critique in Contemporary Youth Studies
por: Cuervo, Hernan, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Nonsignificant P values cannot prove null hypothesis: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
por: Jaykaran,, et al.
Publicado: (2011)